Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SOWG
Sow Good Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-97.8%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.63B
5Y Perf.+184.6%
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.-28.0%

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SOWG logoSOWG
HIMS logoHIMS
SMPL logoSMPL
IndustryPackaged FoodsMedical - Equipment & ServicesPackaged Foods
Market Cap$1M$6.63B$1.24B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$2.35B$1.45B
Net Income (TTM)$-41M$128M$91M
Gross Margin69.7%34.0%
Operating Margin4.6%14.4%
Forward P/E58.3x7.5x
Total Debt$2M$1.12B$304M
Cash & Equiv.$1M$229M$98M

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SOWG
HIMS
SMPL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Sow Good Inc. (SOWG)1002.2-97.8%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100284.6+184.6%
The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL)10072.0-28.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HIMS and SMPL are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Simply Good Foods Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SOWG
Sow Good Inc.
The Secondary Option

SOWG plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HIMS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
  • 161.9% 10Y total return vs SMPL's 3.7%
  • 59.0% revenue growth vs SOWG's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company
The Income Pick

SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.38
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
  • Beta 0.38, current ratio 3.64x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs SOWG's -100.0%
ValueSMPL logoSMPLLower P/E (7.5x vs 58.3x)
Quality / MarginsSMPL logoSMPL6.3% margin vs SOWG's -4.2%
Stability / SafetySMPL logoSMPLBeta 0.38 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HIMS logoHIMS-51.0% vs SOWG's -87.0%
Efficiency (ROA)HIMS logoHIMS6.0% ROA vs SOWG's -123.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -21.5%

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SOWGSow Good Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SMPLThe Simply Good Foods Company
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$103M

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHIMSLAGGINGSOWG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — HIMS and SMPL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HIMS and SOWG operate at a comparable scale, with $2.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.3% (SMPL) to 5.5% (HIMS). On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$2.3B$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M$164M$231M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$41M$128M$91M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M$73M$174M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.7%+34.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.6%+14.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.5%+6.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.1%+12.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.3%+28.4%-0.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.9%-27.3%-31.6%
Evenly matched — HIMS and SMPL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.2x trailing earnings, SMPL trades at a 76% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…
Market CapShares × price$1M$6.6B$1.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1M$7.5B$1.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.02x50.32x12.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.58.29x7.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple42.68x5.97x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.82x0.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.25x0.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF89.61x7.86x
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SOWG. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMPL scores 5/9 vs SOWG's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.1%+23.7%+5.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-123.1%+6.0%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-21.5%+10.7%+8.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-29.4%+10.9%+9.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9145
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.07x0.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$95,146$892M$206M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$229M$98M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$1.1B$304M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-33.23x6.77x
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HIMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $151 for SOWG. Over the past 12 months, HIMS leads with a -51.0% total return vs SOWG's -87.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs SOWG's -73.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-76.6%-23.2%-36.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-87.0%-51.0%-64.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.1%+116.6%-67.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.5%+137.6%-64.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%+161.9%+3.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-73.3%+29.4%-31.5%
HIMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HIMS and SMPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SMPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HIMS currently trades 36.4% from its 52-week high vs SOWG's 3.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.07x2.48x0.34x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$31.80$70.43$36.92
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.70$13.74$10.21
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+3.8%+36.4%+33.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10021.254.542.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded374K34.9M2.8M
Evenly matched — HIMS and SMPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: HIMS as "Hold", SMPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.1% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs 2.1% for HIMS (target: $26).

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$26.20$20.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts1924
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.4%+4.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

HIMS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SMPL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallHims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SOWG or HIMS or SMPL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL?

On trailing P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the cheapest at 12.

2x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL?

Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -98. 5% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +188. 5% versus SOWG's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

34β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 623% more volatile than SMPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -100. 0% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hims & Hers Health, Inc. grew EPS -3. 8% year-over-year, compared to -760. 0% for Sow Good Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL?

The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

1% net margin versus 0. 0% for Sow Good Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus 0. 0% for SOWG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SOWG or HIMS or SMPL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7.

5x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 50. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 62. 1% to $20. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SOWG or HIMS or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

34)). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMPL: +2. 2%, HIMS: +188. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SOWG and HIMS and SMPL?

These companies operate in different sectors (SOWG (Consumer Defensive) and HIMS (Healthcare) and SMPL (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SOWG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SOWG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIMS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SMPL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SOWG and HIMS and SMPL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SOWG: -525.3% · HIMS: 28.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.