Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
TFC vs USB vs PNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TFC vs USB vs PNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $66.85B | $87.33B | $89.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.25B | $42.86B | $33.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.23B | $7.58B | $6.53B |
| Gross Margin | 47.0% | 62.8% | 59.4% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 22.2% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 11.0x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $62.27B | $77.93B | $61.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39.77B | $46.89B | $46.25B |
TFC vs USB vs PNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Truist Financial Co… (TFC) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| U.S. Bancorp (USB) | 100 | 157.9 | +57.9% |
| The PNC Financial S… (PNC) | 100 | 195.0 | +95.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TFC vs USB vs PNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TFC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 2.7% vs USB's 2.4%
- 4.1% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs PNC's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
USB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.29 vs PNC's 3.15
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 12.0x), PEG 1.29 vs 3.15
- +42.1% vs TFC's +35.7%
PNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 5.6%, EPS growth 7.4%
- 216.9% 10Y total return vs TFC's 101.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.6% NII/revenue growth vs TFC's -19.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 12.0x), PEG 1.29 vs 3.15 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TFC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs TFC's 1.07 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs PNC's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.1% vs TFC's +35.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TFC's 0.5% |
TFC vs USB vs PNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TFC vs USB vs PNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USB is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.9B annually — 1.8x TFC's $24.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.9% (TFC) to 17.5% (PNC).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24.3B | $42.9B | $33.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7.2B | $10.3B | $8.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.2B | $7.6B | $6.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.9B | $5.1B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.0% | +62.8% | +59.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +22.2% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +17.7% | +17.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | — | +23.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.1% | +24.8% | +24.6% |
Valuation Metrics
USB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 25% valuation discount to PNC's 16.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), USB offers better value at 1.43x vs PNC's 4.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $66.8B | $87.3B | $89.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $89.3B | $118.4B | $105.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.12x | 12.18x | 16.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.20x | 11.04x | 12.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.43x | 4.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 236.37x | 11.50x | 14.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.76x | 2.04x | 2.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 1.33x | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.89x | — | 11.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
USB delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $8 for TFC. TFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USB's 1.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNC scores 7/9 vs TFC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +11.5% | +11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.4% | +5.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +2.3% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.98x | 1.19x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22.5B | $31.0B | $15.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39.8B | $46.9B | $46.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $62.3B | $77.9B | $61.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.62x | 0.66x | 0.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — USB and PNC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PNC five years ago would be worth $12,770 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,987 for TFC. Over the past 12 months, USB leads with a +42.1% total return vs TFC's +35.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USB at 27.8% vs TFC's 25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.2% | +5.1% | +6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.7% | +42.1% | +40.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.4% | +109.0% | +106.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.1% | +7.2% | +27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.7% | +74.4% | +216.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.7% | +27.8% | +27.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — USB and PNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TFC's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 1.01x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.20 | $61.19 | $243.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.27 | $40.89 | $163.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.4% | +91.8% | +91.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.9 | 51.5 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.6M | 9.1M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TFC and USB and PNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TFC as "Buy", USB as "Hold", PNC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.6% upside for USB (target: $64) vs 13.3% for TFC (target: $58). For income investors, TFC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs PNC's 2.85%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.56 | $63.82 | $252.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 54 | 49 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 14 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.08 | — | $6.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | 0.0% | +1.3% |
USB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PNC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
TFC vs USB vs PNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TFC or USB or PNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the stronger pick with 5. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 0% for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TFC or USB or PNC?
On trailing P/E, U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 2x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. at 16. 2x. On forward P/E, U. S. Bancorp is actually cheaper at 11. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: U. S. Bancorp wins at 1. 29x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 15x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TFC or USB or PNC?
Over the past 5 years, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) delivered a total return of +27. 7%, compared to -0. 1% for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PNC returned +216. 9% versus USB's +74. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TFC or USB or PNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus Truist Financial Corporation's 1. 07β — meaning TFC is approximately 12% more volatile than PNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 98% versus 119% for U. S. Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TFC or USB or PNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is pulling ahead at 5. 6% versus -19. 0% for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Truist Financial Corporation grew EPS 408. 3% year-over-year, compared to 7. 4% for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TFC or USB or PNC?
Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
9% net margin versus 17. 5% for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USB leads at 22. 2% versus -2. 5% for TFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USB leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TFC or USB or PNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, U. S. Bancorp (USB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 29x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 15x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, U. S. Bancorp (USB) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USB: 13. 6% to $63. 82.
08Which pays a better dividend — TFC or USB or PNC?
In this comparison, TFC (4.
1% yield), PNC (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. USB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TFC or USB or PNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 96), 2. 9% yield, +216. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PNC: +216. 9%, USB: +74. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TFC and USB and PNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TFC, PNC pay a dividend while USB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.