Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.24B | $203M | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $579M | $90M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $161M | $14M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 75.1% | 54.7% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 38.8% | 7.0% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 11.8x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $660M | $52M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $133M | $119M | $185M |
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tompkins Financial … (TMP) | 100 | 133.3 | +33.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TMP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 34.1%, EPS growth 126.2%
- PEG 0.68 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 34.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- NIM 3.1% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.53 vs 2.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.53 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs TMP's 1.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs TMP's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.6x CZWI's $90M. TMP is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $579M | $90M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $227M | $9M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $161M | $14M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | $11M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.1% | +54.7% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +7.0% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +16.0% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +11.5% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.9% | +63.0% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TMP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, TMP trades at a 47% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TMP offers better value at 0.46x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $203M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $136M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.63x | 14.44x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.40x | 11.78x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.46x | 2.85x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.84x | 15.28x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 2.25x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.31x | 1.09x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.69x | 19.55x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMP delivers a 19.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMP's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.9% | +7.8% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +2.0% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.3% | +0.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.28x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $527M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $133M | $119M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $660M | $52M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.70x | 0.16x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,178 for TMP. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.2% | +21.5% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.8% | +45.6% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.7% | +160.0% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.8% | +71.2% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.6% | +157.0% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.7% | +37.5% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TMP and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TMP's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TMP currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.46x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $86.95 | $22.62 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.67 | $12.83 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +93.2% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 63.7 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 40K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TMP and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TMP as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -13.7% for TMP (target: $74). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $74.00 | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +1.8% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 7 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.52 | $0.37 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +3.1% | +0.4% |
TMP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TMP or CZWI or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is the stronger pick with 34.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TMP or CZWI or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is the cheapest at 7.
6x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Tompkins Financial Corporation wins at 0. 68x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TMP or CZWI or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to +21. 8% for Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus TMP's +71. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TMP or CZWI or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Tompkins Financial Corporation's 1. 00β — meaning TMP is approximately 117% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 70% for Tompkins Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TMP or CZWI or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is pulling ahead at 34.
1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tompkins Financial Corporation grew EPS 126. 2% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TMP or CZWI or NBTB?
Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
8% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMP leads at 38. 8% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TMP leads at 75. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TMP or CZWI or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 68x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 2. 1% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TMP or CZWI or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is TMP or CZWI or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, TMP: +71. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TMP and CZWI and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.