Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
USB vs WFC vs PNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
USB vs WFC vs PNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $87.33B | $248.64B | $89.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42.86B | $125.40B | $33.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.58B | $21.06B | $6.53B |
| Gross Margin | 62.8% | 62.2% | 59.4% |
| Operating Margin | 22.2% | 18.6% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $77.93B | $281.88B | $61.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46.89B | $203.36B | $46.25B |
USB vs WFC vs PNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Bancorp (USB) | 100 | 157.9 | +57.9% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | 100 | 303.7 | +203.7% |
| The PNC Financial S… (PNC) | 100 | 195.0 | +95.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USB vs WFC vs PNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.29 vs PNC's 3.15
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 11.5x), PEG 1.29 vs 2.06
- +42.1% vs WFC's +11.8%
WFC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 11.2%
- NIM 2.5% vs USB's 2.4%
- 8.7% NII/revenue growth vs USB's 0.3%
PNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 2.9%
- 216.9% 10Y total return vs WFC's 92.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, current ratio 0.15x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% NII/revenue growth vs USB's 0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 11.5x), PEG 1.29 vs 2.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs WFC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs USB's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs WFC's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.1% vs WFC's +11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs WFC's 0.4% |
USB vs WFC vs PNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
USB vs WFC vs PNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.4B annually — 3.7x PNC's $33.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.7% (USB) to 15.7% (WFC).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42.9B | $125.4B | $33.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.3B | $31.6B | $8.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.6B | $21.1B | $6.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.1B | -$14.2B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.8% | +62.2% | +59.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +18.6% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +15.7% | +17.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +2.4% | +23.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.8% | +16.9% | +24.6% |
Valuation Metrics
USB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 25% valuation discount to PNC's 16.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), USB offers better value at 1.43x vs PNC's 4.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $87.3B | $248.6B | $89.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $118.4B | $327.2B | $105.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.18x | 14.97x | 16.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.04x | 11.51x | 12.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.43x | 2.68x | 4.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.50x | 10.58x | 14.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.04x | 1.98x | 2.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 1.54x | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 81.93x | 11.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PNC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
USB delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for PNC. PNC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WFC's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNC scores 7/9 vs USB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.5% | +11.5% | +11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +3.7% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +5.0% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.19x | 1.56x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31.0B | $78.5B | $15.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46.9B | $203.4B | $46.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77.9B | $281.9B | $61.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.66x | 0.60x | 0.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WFC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WFC five years ago would be worth $18,647 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,718 for USB. Over the past 12 months, USB leads with a +42.1% total return vs WFC's +11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WFC at 30.2% vs PNC's 27.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | -15.1% | +6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.1% | +11.8% | +40.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.0% | +120.8% | +106.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.2% | +86.5% | +27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.4% | +92.0% | +216.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.8% | +30.2% | +27.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — USB and PNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USB's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. USB currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs WFC's 82.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.00x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.19 | $97.76 | $243.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.89 | $71.90 | $163.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.8% | +82.2% | +91.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 45.6 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.1M | 15.0M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
PNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USB as "Hold", WFC as "Hold", PNC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.1% upside for WFC (target: $98) vs 13.6% for PNC (target: $253). For income investors, PNC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.85% vs WFC's 1.84%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.82 | $98.13 | $252.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 49 | 60 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 3 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.48 | $6.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.0% | +1.3% |
USB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PNC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
USB vs WFC vs PNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USB or WFC or PNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the stronger pick with 8.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate U. S. Bancorp (USB) a "Hold" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USB or WFC or PNC?
On trailing P/E, U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 2x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. at 16. 2x. On forward P/E, U. S. Bancorp is actually cheaper at 11. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: U. S. Bancorp wins at 1. 29x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 15x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USB or WFC or PNC?
Over the past 5 years, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) delivered a total return of +86.
5%, compared to +7. 2% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PNC returned +216. 9% versus USB's +74. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USB or WFC or PNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus U. S. Bancorp's 1. 01β — meaning USB is approximately 5% more volatile than PNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 113% versus 156% for Wells Fargo & Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USB or WFC or PNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is pulling ahead at 8.
7% versus 0. 3% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: U. S. Bancorp grew EPS 21. 6% year-over-year, compared to 7. 4% for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USB or WFC or PNC?
U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 7% net margin versus 15. 7% for Wells Fargo & Company — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USB leads at 22. 2% versus 18. 6% for WFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USB leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USB or WFC or PNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, U. S. Bancorp (USB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 29x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 15x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, U. S. Bancorp (USB) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WFC: 22. 1% to $98. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — USB or WFC or PNC?
In this comparison, PNC (2.
9% yield), WFC (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. USB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is USB or WFC or PNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 96), 2. 9% yield, +216. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PNC: +216. 9%, USB: +74. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USB and WFC and PNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WFC, PNC pay a dividend while USB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.