Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
WU vs IMXI vs PYPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
WU vs IMXI vs PYPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $2.83B | $477M | $40.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.04B | $521M | $33.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $441M | $33M | $5.06B |
| Gross Margin | 28.7% | 7.6% | 46.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | -3.8% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 5.1x | 10.5x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $217M | $9.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.23B | $169M | $8.05B |
WU vs IMXI vs PYPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Western Union C… (WU) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| International Money… (IMXI) | 100 | 143.8 | +43.8% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WU vs IMXI vs PYPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.4%
- Beta 0.63, yield 10.4%, current ratio 16.52x
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 10.5x)
IMXI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 63.5% 10Y total return vs PYPL's 17.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, current ratio 2.51x
- Beta 0.37 vs PYPL's 1.39
PYPL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 35.6%
- PEG 0.98 vs IMXI's 2.50
- 4.3% NII/revenue growth vs IMXI's -21.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% NII/revenue growth vs IMXI's -21.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 10.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs IMXI's 6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs PYPL's 1.39 | |
| Dividends | 10.4% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs PYPL's 0.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.6% vs PYPL's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs WU's 5.5%, ROIC -7.6% vs 23.3% |
WU vs IMXI vs PYPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WU vs IMXI vs PYPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PYPL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PYPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.2B annually — 63.7x IMXI's $521M. PYPL is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IMXI's 6.3%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $521M | $33.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $838M | -$3M | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $441M | $33M | $5.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $331M | $16M | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.7% | +7.6% | +46.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | -3.8% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +6.3% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +3.0% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -63.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.4% | -38.8% | -6.2% |
Valuation Metrics
WU leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, WU trades at a 60% valuation discount to IMXI's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PYPL offers better value at 0.97x vs IMXI's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $477M | $40.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $525M | $42.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.90x | 14.69x | 8.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.12x | 10.45x | 8.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.51x | 0.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.68x | — | 6.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 0.92x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.09x | 2.97x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.20x | 30.18x | 7.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — WU and PYPL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WU delivers a 47.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $22 for IMXI. PYPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IMXI's 1.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PYPL scores 8/9 vs IMXI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +47.9% | +22.1% | +25.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +6.5% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.3% | -7.6% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | -5.8% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.34x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.2B | $48M | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $169M | $8.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $217M | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.11x | -1.69x | 19.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMXI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMXI five years ago would be worth $10,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,835 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, IMXI leads with a +51.6% total return vs PYPL's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WU at -1.1% vs PYPL's -14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | +3.4% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.5% | +51.6% | -32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.3% | -38.0% | -38.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +9.4% | -81.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.6% | +63.5% | +17.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.1% | -14.8% | -14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
IMXI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMXI is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PYPL's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMXI currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs PYPL's 58.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.37x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.35 | $15.95 | $79.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.85 | $8.58 | $38.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.2% | +99.4% | +58.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 46.9 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.1M | 358K | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
WU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WU as "Hold", IMXI as "Buy", PYPL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 70.2% upside for IMXI (target: $27) vs -0.3% for WU (target: $9). For income investors, WU offers the higher dividend yield at 10.45% vs PYPL's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $27.00 | $51.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 12 | 70 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.4% | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.94 | — | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.3% | +3.4% | +14.8% |
WU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). IMXI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
WU vs IMXI vs PYPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WU or IMXI or PYPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 0% for International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI). The Western Union Company (WU) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (5. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WU or IMXI or PYPL?
On trailing P/E, The Western Union Company (WU) is the cheapest at 5.
9x versus International Money Express, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, The Western Union Company is actually cheaper at 5. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PayPal Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 98x versus International Money Express, Inc. 's 2. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WU or IMXI or PYPL?
Over the past 5 years, International Money Express, Inc.
(IMXI) delivered a total return of +9. 4%, compared to -81. 6% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMXI returned +63. 5% versus WU's -7. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WU or IMXI or PYPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Money Express, Inc.
(IMXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus PayPal Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning PYPL is approximately 275% more volatile than IMXI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 134% for International Money Express, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WU or IMXI or PYPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus -21. 0% for International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PayPal Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 35. 6% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for The Western Union Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WU or IMXI or PYPL?
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 8% net margin versus 6. 3% for International Money Express, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WU leads at 19. 4% versus -3. 8% for IMXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PYPL leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WU or IMXI or PYPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus International Money Express, Inc. 's 2. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Western Union Company (WU) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 10. 5x for International Money Express, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMXI: 70. 2% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WU or IMXI or PYPL?
In this comparison, WU (10.
4% yield), PYPL (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. IMXI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WU or IMXI or PYPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Western Union Company (WU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), 10. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WU: -7. 6%, PYPL: +17. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WU and IMXI and PYPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (WU (Financial Services) and IMXI (Technology) and PYPL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WU pays a dividend while IMXI, PYPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.