Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Information Technology Services
Auto - Dealerships
ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Specialty Retail | Information Technology Services | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $33M | $165M | $2.60B | $250M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $113M | $9.77B | $9.50B | $3.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-204M | $-568M | $-178M |
| Gross Margin | 12.3% | 49.2% | 22.7% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.6% | -0.5% | 9.0% | 7.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.0x | 34.7x | 5.7x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $2.52B | $18.45B | $170M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $1.64B | $2.04B | $1.29B |
ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Able View Inc. (ABLV) | 100 | 15.7 | -84.3% |
| Baozun Inc. (BZUN) | 100 | 70.6 | -29.4% |
| VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) | 100 | 238.9 | +138.9% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABLV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta -0.46, yield 0.2%
- 2.1% margin vs VNET's -6.0%
- 0.2% yield, vs BZUN's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 5.4% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC -81.3% vs 4.6%
BZUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 1.48, yield 0.1%, current ratio 1.93x
- Lower P/E (1.0x vs 5.7x)
- Beta 1.48 vs VNET's 2.70, lower leverage
VNET is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.4%, EPS growth 103.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- -36.8% 10Y total return vs CANG's -44.9%
- 11.4% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
- +42.2% vs CANG's -73.7%
CANG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.4% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 5.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs VNET's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs VNET's 2.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, vs BZUN's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.2% vs CANG's -73.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC -81.3% vs 4.6% |
ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BZUN leads in 1 of 6 categories
CANG leads 1 • VNET leads 1 • ABLV leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ABLV and CANG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BZUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.8B annually — 86.6x ABLV's $113M. ABLV is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNET's -6.0%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $113M | $9.8B | $9.5B | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $902,648 | -$4M | $2.8B | $333M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$204M | -$568M | -$178M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $0 | -$3.9B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +49.2% | +22.7% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | -0.5% | +9.0% | +7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | -2.1% | -6.0% | -5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -1.1% | -40.7% | -154.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.7% | +4.8% | +23.8% | +58.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.8% | -29.2% | -2.1% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BZUN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 94% valuation discount to VNET's 92.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BZUN's 15.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $165M | $2.6B | $250M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | $294M | $5.0B | $85M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.72x | -6.08x | 92.39x | 5.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.95x | 34.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.40x | 15.40x | 3.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.12x | 2.14x | 2.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.95x | 0.19x | 2.56x | 0.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CANG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABLV delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-8 for VNET. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNET's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNET scores 7/9 vs ABLV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.9% | -3.7% | -7.6% | -4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | -2.1% | -1.5% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -81.3% | -1.3% | +2.4% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.4% | -1.7% | +3.2% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.57x | 0.44x | 2.67x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $879M | $16.4B | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $1.6B | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $2.5B | $18.4B | $170M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.79x | -0.78x | 1.75x | -1.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VNET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for BZUN. Over the past 12 months, VNET leads with a +42.2% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNET at 44.2% vs ABLV's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.4% | -1.8% | -1.6% | -62.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.1% | -15.9% | +42.2% | -73.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -40.4% | +199.7% | +1.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -91.6% | -65.1% | -14.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -49.3% | -36.8% | -44.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.4% | -15.8% | +44.2% | +0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABLV and VNET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABLV is the less volatile stock with a -0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNET's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VNET currently trades 61.9% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.46x | 1.48x | 2.70x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.77 | $4.88 | $14.48 | $2.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $2.07 | $5.15 | $0.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.9% | +56.6% | +61.9% | +18.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 53.8 | 53.0 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 314K | 376K | 5.7M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ABLV and CANG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BZUN as "Buy", VNET as "Buy", CANG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 93.8% for BZUN (target: $5). ABLV is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.35 | $23.55 | $3.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 16 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +0.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | $0.02 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +8.5% | 0.0% | +5.3% |
BZUN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). CANG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, VNET Group, Inc.
(VNET) is the stronger pick with 11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Baozun Inc. (BZUN) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus VNET Group, Inc. at 92. 4x. On forward P/E, Baozun Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -91. 6% for Baozun Inc. (BZUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VNET returned -36. 8% versus ABLV's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Able View Inc.
(ABLV) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 46β versus VNET Group, Inc. 's 2. 70β — meaning VNET is approximately -692% more volatile than ABLV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for VNET Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), VNET Group, Inc.
(VNET) is pulling ahead at 11. 4% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -175. 0% for Able View Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VNET leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -5. 8% for Able View Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -6. 8% for ABLV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Baozun Inc.
(BZUN) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 34. 7x for VNET Group, Inc. — 33. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459. 2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG?
In this comparison, ABLV (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BZUN, VNET, CANG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Able View Inc.
(ABLV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 46)). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABLV: -87. 8%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABLV and BZUN and VNET and CANG?
These companies operate in different sectors (ABLV (Communication Services) and BZUN (Consumer Cyclical) and VNET (Technology) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ABLV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BZUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.