Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG vs BABA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ABLV
Able View Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$33M
5Y Perf.-84.3%
BZUN
Baozun Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$165M
5Y Perf.-29.4%
VNET
VNET Group, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$2.60B
5Y Perf.+138.9%
CANG
Cango Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.-12.8%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$340.44B
5Y Perf.+51.8%

ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG vs BABA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ABLV logoABLV
BZUN logoBZUN
VNET logoVNET
CANG logoCANG
BABA logoBABA
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesSpecialty RetailInformation Technology ServicesAuto - DealershipsSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$33M$165M$2.60B$250M$340.44B
Revenue (TTM)$113M$9.77B$9.50B$3.46B$1.01T
Net Income (TTM)$2M$-204M$-568M$-178M$123.35B
Gross Margin12.3%49.2%22.7%13.6%41.2%
Operating Margin0.6%-0.5%9.0%7.3%10.9%
Forward P/E1.0x34.7x5.7x4.1x
Total Debt$11M$2.52B$18.45B$170M$248.49B
Cash & Equiv.$15M$1.64B$2.04B$1.29B$181.73B

ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG vs BABALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ABLV
BZUN
VNET
CANG
BABA
StockAug 23May 26Return
Able View Inc. (ABLV)10015.7-84.3%
Baozun Inc. (BZUN)10070.6-29.4%
VNET Group, Inc. (VNET)100238.9+138.9%
Cango Inc. (CANG)10087.2-12.8%
Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA)100151.8+51.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG vs BABA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BABA leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. VNET Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. BZUN also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ABLV
Able View Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

ABLV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
BZUN
Baozun Inc.
The Value Play

BZUN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (1.0x vs 4.1x)
Best for: value
VNET
VNET Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

VNET is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 11.4%, EPS growth 103.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
  • 11.4% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
  • +42.2% vs CANG's -73.7%
Best for: growth exposure
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, CANG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
The Income Pick

BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 1.3%
  • 83.4% 10Y total return vs CANG's -44.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 22.8%, current ratio 1.54x
  • Beta 1.21, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.54x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVNET logoVNET11.4% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
ValueBZUN logoBZUNLower P/E (1.0x vs 4.1x)
Quality / MarginsBABA logoBABA12.2% margin vs VNET's -6.0%
Stability / SafetyBABA logoBABABeta 1.21 vs VNET's 2.70, lower leverage
DividendsBABA logoBABA1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ABLV's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)VNET logoVNET+42.2% vs CANG's -73.7%
Efficiency (ROA)BABA logoBABA6.7% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 9.6% vs 4.6%

ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ABLVAble View Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BZUNBaozun Inc.
FY 2024
Service
63.2%$6.0B
Product
36.8%$3.5B
VNETVNET Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Hosting and Related Services
83.8%$71M
Cloud Services
16.2%$14M
CANGCango Inc.
FY 2024
After-market Service Facilitation Service Income
62.9%$41M
Loan Facilitation Income And Other Related Income
24.1%$16M
Automobile trading income
9.6%$6M
Service, Other
3.4%$2M
BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited
FY 2025
Customer Management Services
42.6%$424.9B
Sales Of Goods
27.5%$274.3B
Logistics Services
12.4%$123.4B
Cloud Services
8.5%$84.5B
Membership Fees and Value Added Services
4.7%$46.6B
Product and Service, Other
4.3%$42.7B

ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG vs BABA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBZUNLAGGINGCANG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CANG and BABA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 8969.3x ABLV's $113M. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNET's -6.0%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$113M$9.8B$9.5B$3.5B$1.01T
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$902,648-$4M$2.8B$333M$114.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M-$204M-$568M-$178M$123.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3M$0-$3.9B$0$2.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+12.3%+49.2%+22.7%+13.6%+41.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.6%-0.5%+9.0%+7.3%+10.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.1%-2.1%-6.0%-5.2%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.7%-1.1%-40.7%-154.0%+0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-25.7%+4.8%+23.8%+58.3%+4.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+97.8%-29.2%-2.1%+3.6%-52.0%
Evenly matched — CANG and BABA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BZUN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 94% valuation discount to VNET's 92.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BZUN's 15.4x.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Market CapShares × price$33M$165M$2.6B$250M$340.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$29M$294M$5.0B$85M$350.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.72x-6.08x92.39x5.66x17.90x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.95x34.74x4.13x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.40x15.40x3.13x13.55x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.26x0.12x2.14x2.12x2.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.95x0.19x2.56x0.42x2.12x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.64x
BZUN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BABA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABLV delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-8 for VNET. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNET's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNET scores 7/9 vs ABLV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+27.9%-3.7%-7.6%-4.1%+11.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.4%-2.1%-1.5%-2.3%+6.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-81.3%-1.3%+2.4%+4.6%+9.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-25.4%-1.7%+3.2%+4.5%+10.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926747
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.57x0.44x2.67x0.04x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M$879M$16.4B-$1.1B$66.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$1.6B$2.0B$1.3B$181.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$11M$2.5B$18.4B$170M$248.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-22.79x-0.78x1.75x-1.87x15.74x
BABA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

VNET leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for BZUN. Over the past 12 months, VNET leads with a +42.2% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNET at 44.2% vs ABLV's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-0.4%-1.8%-1.6%-62.0%-9.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-48.1%-15.9%+42.2%-73.7%+16.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%-40.4%+199.7%+1.2%+74.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%-91.6%-65.1%-14.2%-35.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%-49.3%-36.8%-44.9%+83.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-50.4%-15.8%+44.2%+0.4%+20.5%
VNET leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ABLV and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ABLV is the less volatile stock with a -0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNET's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BABA currently trades 73.2% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.46x1.48x2.70x2.25x1.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.77$4.88$14.48$2.88$192.67
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.54$2.07$5.15$0.33$103.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+37.9%+56.6%+61.9%+18.6%+73.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.453.853.058.661.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded314K376K5.7M1.3M10.4M
Evenly matched — ABLV and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CANG and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BZUN as "Buy", VNET as "Buy", CANG as "Buy", BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 37.8% for BABA (target: $194). For income investors, BABA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.27% vs ABLV's 0.21%.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.35$23.55$3.00$194.23
# AnalystsCovering analysts1316259
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.1%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0052
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00$0.02$12.14
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.6%+8.5%0.0%+5.3%+3.8%
Evenly matched — CANG and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BZUN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). BABA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallBaozun Inc. (BZUN)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ABLV vs BZUN vs VNET vs CANG vs BABA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG or BABA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, VNET Group, Inc.

(VNET) is the stronger pick with 11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Baozun Inc. (BZUN) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG or BABA?

On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus VNET Group, Inc. at 92. 4x. On forward P/E, Baozun Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG or BABA?

Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.

(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -91. 6% for Baozun Inc. (BZUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +83. 4% versus ABLV's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG or BABA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Able View Inc.

(ABLV) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 46β versus VNET Group, Inc. 's 2. 70β — meaning VNET is approximately -692% more volatile than ABLV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for VNET Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG or BABA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), VNET Group, Inc.

(VNET) is pulling ahead at 11. 4% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -175. 0% for Able View Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VNET leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG or BABA?

Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -5. 8% for Able View Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -6. 8% for ABLV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG or BABA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Baozun Inc.

(BZUN) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 34. 7x for VNET Group, Inc. — 33. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459. 2% to $3. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG or BABA?

In this comparison, BABA (1.

3% yield), ABLV (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BZUN, VNET, CANG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ABLV or BZUN or VNET or CANG or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Able View Inc.

(ABLV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 46)). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABLV: -87. 8%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ABLV and BZUN and VNET and CANG and BABA?

These companies operate in different sectors (ABLV (Communication Services) and BZUN (Consumer Cyclical) and VNET (Technology) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ABLV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BZUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock. BABA pays a dividend while ABLV, BZUN, VNET, CANG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ABLV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BZUN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VNET

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CANG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 2916%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BABA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ABLV and BZUN and VNET and CANG and BABA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ABLV: -25.7% · BZUN: 4.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.