Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ABLV vs CANG vs BZUN vs BABA vs JD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
ABLV vs CANG vs BZUN vs BABA vs JD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $33M | $250M | $165M | $340.44B | $46.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $113M | $3.46B | $9.77B | $1.01T | $1.30T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-178M | $-204M | $123.35B | $32.20B |
| Gross Margin | 12.3% | 13.6% | 49.2% | 41.2% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.6% | 7.3% | -0.5% | 10.9% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.7x | 1.0x | 4.1x | 1.4x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $170M | $2.52B | $248.49B | $89.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $1.29B | $1.64B | $181.73B | $108.35B |
ABLV vs CANG vs BZUN vs BABA vs JD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Able View Inc. (ABLV) | 100 | 15.7 | -84.3% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
| Baozun Inc. (BZUN) | 100 | 70.6 | -29.4% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 91.0 | -9.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABLV vs CANG vs BZUN vs BABA vs JD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABLV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CANG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BZUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 6.9% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
- Lower P/E (1.0x vs 4.1x)
BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 83.4% 10Y total return vs CANG's -44.9%
- 12.2% margin vs CANG's -5.2%
- 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +16.0% vs CANG's -73.7%
JD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.6%
- Rev growth 6.8%, EPS growth 76.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 28.7%, current ratio 1.29x
- Beta 1.06, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.29x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 4.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs CANG's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs CANG's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.0% vs CANG's -73.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 9.6% vs 4.6% |
ABLV vs CANG vs BZUN vs BABA vs JD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ABLV vs CANG vs BZUN vs BABA vs JD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories
BZUN leads 1 • ABLV leads 0 • CANG leads 0 • JD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CANG and BABA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 11554.8x ABLV's $113M. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CANG's -5.2%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $113M | $3.5B | $9.8B | $1.01T | $1.30T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $902,648 | $333M | -$4M | $114.6B | $23.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$178M | -$204M | $123.4B | $32.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $0 | $0 | $2.6B | $9.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +13.6% | +49.2% | +41.2% | +12.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +7.3% | -0.5% | +10.9% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | -5.2% | -2.1% | +12.2% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -154.0% | -1.1% | +0.3% | +0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.7% | +58.3% | +4.8% | +4.8% | +14.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.8% | +3.6% | -29.2% | -52.0% | -56.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BZUN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 68% valuation discount to BABA's 17.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BZUN's 15.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $250M | $165M | $340.4B | $46.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | $85M | $294M | $350.3B | $43.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.72x | 5.66x | -6.08x | 17.90x | 7.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 0.95x | 4.13x | 1.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 3.13x | 15.40x | 13.55x | 6.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 2.12x | 0.12x | 2.33x | 0.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.95x | 0.42x | 0.19x | 2.12x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 29.64x | 7.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABLV delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CANG. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ABLV's 1.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs ABLV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.9% | -4.1% | -3.7% | +11.2% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | -2.3% | -2.1% | +6.7% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -81.3% | +4.6% | -1.3% | +9.6% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.4% | +4.5% | -1.7% | +10.4% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.57x | 0.04x | 0.44x | 0.23x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$1.1B | $879M | $66.8B | -$18.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $1.3B | $1.6B | $181.7B | $108.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $170M | $2.5B | $248.5B | $89.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.79x | -1.87x | -0.78x | 15.74x | 12.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for BZUN. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +16.0% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.5% vs ABLV's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.4% | -62.0% | -1.8% | -9.5% | +5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.1% | -73.7% | -15.9% | +16.0% | -7.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | +1.2% | -40.4% | +74.8% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -14.2% | -91.6% | -35.4% | -53.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -44.9% | -49.3% | +83.4% | +48.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.4% | +0.4% | -15.8% | +20.5% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABLV and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABLV is the less volatile stock with a -0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JD currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.46x | 2.25x | 1.48x | 1.21x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.77 | $2.88 | $4.88 | $192.67 | $38.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $0.33 | $2.07 | $103.71 | $24.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.9% | +18.6% | +56.6% | +73.2% | +79.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 58.6 | 53.8 | 61.8 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 314K | 1.3M | 376K | 10.4M | 10.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CANG and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", BZUN as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", JD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 8.8% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.61% vs ABLV's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.00 | $5.35 | $194.23 | $32.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 13 | 59 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | +0.1% | +1.3% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — | $0.02 | $12.14 | $5.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +5.3% | +8.5% | +3.8% | +8.2% |
BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BZUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ABLV vs CANG vs BZUN vs BABA vs JD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABLV or CANG or BZUN or BABA or JD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Baozun Inc.
(BZUN) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABLV or CANG or BZUN or BABA or JD?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited at 17. 9x. On forward P/E, Baozun Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABLV or CANG or BZUN or BABA or JD?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -91. 6% for Baozun Inc. (BZUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +83. 4% versus ABLV's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABLV or CANG or BZUN or BABA or JD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Able View Inc.
(ABLV) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 46β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately -594% more volatile than ABLV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 157% for Able View Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABLV or CANG or BZUN or BABA or JD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Baozun Inc.
(BZUN) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -175. 0% for Able View Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JD leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABLV or CANG or BZUN or BABA or JD?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -5. 8% for Able View Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -6. 8% for ABLV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABLV or CANG or BZUN or BABA or JD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Baozun Inc.
(BZUN) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 4. 1x for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459. 2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABLV or CANG or BZUN or BABA or JD?
In this comparison, JD (2.
6% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield), ABLV (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CANG, BZUN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ABLV or CANG or BZUN or BABA or JD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Able View Inc.
(ABLV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 46)). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABLV: -87. 8%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABLV and CANG and BZUN and BABA and JD?
These companies operate in different sectors (ABLV (Communication Services) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and BZUN (Consumer Cyclical) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and JD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ABLV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; BZUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. BABA, JD pay a dividend while ABLV, CANG, BZUN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.