Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ACXP
Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-98.3%
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$32M
5Y Perf.-99.7%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.63B
5Y Perf.+21.5%
NICE
NICE Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$5.78B
5Y Perf.-61.4%
FIVN
Five9, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.70B
5Y Perf.-87.9%

ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ACXP logoACXP
LPSN logoLPSN
PRAX logoPRAX
NICE logoNICE
FIVN logoFIVN
IndustryBiotechnologySoftware - ApplicationBiotechnologySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$5M$32M$9.63B$5.78B$1.70B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$244M$-92K$2.95B$1.17B
Net Income (TTM)$-7.97B$-67M$-327M$612M$57M
Gross Margin62.2%66.4%55.1%
Operating Margin-9.6%21.9%4.7%
Forward P/E8.7x7.0x
Total Debt$0.00$392M$110K$164M$847M
Cash & Equiv.$7.56B$95M$357M$379M$232M

ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ACXP
LPSN
PRAX
NICE
FIVN
StockJun 21May 26Return
Acurx Pharmaceutica… (ACXP)1001.7-98.3%
LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN)1000.3-99.7%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)100121.5+21.5%
NICE Ltd. (NICE)10038.6-61.4%
Five9, Inc. (FIVN)10012.1-87.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NICE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Five9, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. PRAX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ACXP
Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

ACXP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
  • Beta 1.55, current ratio 10.22x
  • +7.7% vs LPSN's -77.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
NICE
NICE Ltd.
The Income Pick

NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72
  • 20.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
  • Beta 0.72 vs ACXP's 2.42
  • 11.8% ROA vs ACXP's -413.5%
Best for: income & stability
FIVN
Five9, Inc.
The Growth Play

FIVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
  • 125.4% 10Y total return vs NICE's 50.7%
  • 10.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFIVN logoFIVN10.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueFIVN logoFIVNBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsNICE logoNICE20.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
Stability / SafetyNICE logoNICEBeta 0.72 vs ACXP's 2.42
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+7.7% vs LPSN's -77.1%
Efficiency (ROA)NICE logoNICE11.8% ROA vs ACXP's -413.5%

ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ACXPAcurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LPSNLivePerson, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosted Services - Business
85.2%$208M
Professional Services
14.8%$36M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
NICENICE Ltd.
FY 2025
Cloud
76.0%$2.2B
Service
19.0%$560M
Product
5.0%$147M
FIVNFive9, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.1B

ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNICELAGGINGFIVN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

NICE and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $2.9B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, FIVN holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricACXP logoACXPAcurx Pharmaceuti…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$244M-$92,000$2.9B$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$35,910-$562,000-$357M$845M$140M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$8.0B-$67M-$327M$612M$57M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4.6B-$43M-$283M$665M$206M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.2%+66.4%+55.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.6%+21.9%+4.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-27.6%+20.8%+4.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-17.4%+22.6%+17.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-19.0%+9.0%+9.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+98.2%+79.4%+2.7%+56.5%+20.0%
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NICE leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 80% valuation discount to FIVN's 48.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NICE's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FIVN's 16.8x.

MetricACXP logoACXPAcurx Pharmaceuti…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$5M$32M$9.6B$5.8B$1.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$7.6B$329M$9.3B$5.6B$2.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.40x-0.22x-24.72x9.89x48.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.74x6.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.59x16.84x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.13x1.96x1.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x8.54x1.56x2.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.22x8.45x
NICE leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ACXP. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIVN's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricACXP logoACXPAcurx Pharmaceuti…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.0%-43.0%+16.4%+7.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.1%-12.4%-40.2%+11.8%+3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-6.6%-65.0%+13.2%+1.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-5.8%-49.3%+16.1%+2.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935378
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.04x1.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7.6B$297M-$357M-$216M$615M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7.6B$95M$357M$379M$232M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$392M$110,000$164M$847M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.20x7.94x
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PRAX five years ago would be worth $7,918 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs ACXP's -67.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricACXP logoACXPAcurx Pharmaceuti…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-23.2%-31.1%+16.4%-14.6%+18.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-70.1%-77.1%+775.0%-40.4%-11.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.5%-95.8%+1976.5%-49.3%-61.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%-99.7%-20.8%-59.1%-87.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%-97.0%-20.1%+50.7%+125.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-67.4%-65.4%+174.9%-20.2%-27.2%
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PRAX and NICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACXP's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ACXP's 10.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricACXP logoACXPAcurx Pharmaceuti…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.42x2.05x1.55x0.72x1.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.00$21.60$356.00$180.61$30.38
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.33$2.37$35.18$94.89$13.29
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+10.1%+12.4%+93.6%+53.0%+73.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.940.355.640.968.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.6M148K378K631K2.8M
Evenly matched — PRAX and NICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PRAX as "Buy", NICE as "Buy", FIVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 27.9% for FIVN (target: $28).

MetricACXP logoACXPAcurx Pharmaceuti…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$544.40$150.88$28.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts162341
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+100.0%0.0%0.0%+8.5%+2.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

NICE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallNICE Ltd. (NICE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Five9, Inc.

(FIVN) is the stronger pick with 10. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?

On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Five9, Inc. at 48. 3x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?

Over the past 5 years, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

(PRAX) delivered a total return of -20. 8%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIVN returned +125. 4% versus ACXP's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 42β — meaning ACXP is approximately 234% more volatile than NICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 108% for Five9, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Five9, Inc.

(FIVN) is pulling ahead at 10. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?

NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 21. 9% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NICE leads at 66. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc.

(FIVN) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 7x for NICE Ltd. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 63. 3% to $544. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ACXP) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NICE: +50. 7%, ACXP: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ACXP and LPSN and PRAX and NICE and FIVN?

These companies operate in different sectors (ACXP (Healthcare) and LPSN (Technology) and PRAX (Healthcare) and NICE (Technology) and FIVN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ACXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ACXP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LPSN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIVN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.