Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Biotechnology
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Software - Application | Biotechnology | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $5M | $32M | $9.63B | $5.78B | $1.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $244M | $-92K | $2.95B | $1.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7.97B | $-67M | $-327M | $612M | $57M |
| Gross Margin | — | 62.2% | — | 66.4% | 55.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.6% | — | 21.9% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 8.7x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $392M | $110K | $164M | $847M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7.56B | $95M | $357M | $379M | $232M |
ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acurx Pharmaceutica… (ACXP) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 121.5 | +21.5% |
| NICE Ltd. (NICE) | 100 | 38.6 | -61.4% |
| Five9, Inc. (FIVN) | 100 | 12.1 | -87.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACXP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
- Beta 1.55, current ratio 10.22x
- +7.7% vs LPSN's -77.1%
NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72
- 20.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
- Beta 0.72 vs ACXP's 2.42
- 11.8% ROA vs ACXP's -413.5%
FIVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- 125.4% 10Y total return vs NICE's 50.7%
- 10.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs ACXP's 2.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs LPSN's -77.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs ACXP's -413.5% |
ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NICE leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • ACXP leads 0 • LPSN leads 0 • FIVN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NICE and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $2.9B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, FIVN holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $244M | -$92,000 | $2.9B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35,910 | -$562,000 | -$357M | $845M | $140M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8.0B | -$67M | -$327M | $612M | $57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.6B | -$43M | -$283M | $665M | $206M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +62.2% | — | +66.4% | +55.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -9.6% | — | +21.9% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -27.6% | — | +20.8% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -17.4% | — | +22.6% | +17.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -19.0% | — | +9.0% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.2% | +79.4% | +2.7% | +56.5% | +20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NICE leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 80% valuation discount to FIVN's 48.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NICE's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FIVN's 16.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $32M | $9.6B | $5.8B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$7.6B | $329M | $9.3B | $5.6B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.40x | -0.22x | -24.72x | 9.89x | 48.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 8.74x | 6.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.37x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 6.59x | 16.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.13x | — | 1.96x | 1.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | — | 8.54x | 1.56x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 8.22x | 8.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ACXP. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIVN's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.0% | — | -43.0% | +16.4% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.1% | -12.4% | -40.2% | +11.8% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -6.6% | -65.0% | +13.2% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -5.8% | -49.3% | +16.1% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.00x | 0.04x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7.6B | $297M | -$357M | -$216M | $615M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.6B | $95M | $357M | $379M | $232M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $392M | $110,000 | $164M | $847M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.20x | — | — | 7.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRAX five years ago would be worth $7,918 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs ACXP's -67.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.2% | -31.1% | +16.4% | -14.6% | +18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -70.1% | -77.1% | +775.0% | -40.4% | -11.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | -95.8% | +1976.5% | -49.3% | -61.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -99.7% | -20.8% | -59.1% | -87.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -97.0% | -20.1% | +50.7% | +125.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -67.4% | -65.4% | +174.9% | -20.2% | -27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRAX and NICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACXP's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ACXP's 10.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.42x | 2.05x | 1.55x | 0.72x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.00 | $21.60 | $356.00 | $180.61 | $30.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.33 | $2.37 | $35.18 | $94.89 | $13.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.1% | +12.4% | +93.6% | +53.0% | +73.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 40.3 | 55.6 | 40.9 | 68.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 148K | 378K | 631K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRAX as "Buy", NICE as "Buy", FIVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 27.9% for FIVN (target: $28).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $544.40 | $150.88 | $28.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | 23 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +8.5% | +2.9% |
NICE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ACXP vs LPSN vs PRAX vs NICE vs FIVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) is the stronger pick with 10. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?
On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Five9, Inc. at 48. 3x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?
Over the past 5 years, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) delivered a total return of -20. 8%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIVN returned +125. 4% versus ACXP's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 42β — meaning ACXP is approximately 234% more volatile than NICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 108% for Five9, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) is pulling ahead at 10. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?
NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 21. 9% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NICE leads at 66. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 7x for NICE Ltd. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 63. 3% to $544. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ACXP or LPSN or PRAX or NICE or FIVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ACXP) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NICE: +50. 7%, ACXP: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACXP and LPSN and PRAX and NICE and FIVN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACXP (Healthcare) and LPSN (Technology) and PRAX (Healthcare) and NICE (Technology) and FIVN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.