Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AER vs FTAI vs AL vs GATX vs FLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Aerospace & Defense
AER vs FTAI vs AL vs GATX vs FLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $24.12B | $27.31B | $7.26B | $6.53B | $6.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.11B | $2.84B | $3.02B | $1.90B | $185M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.93B | $537M | $1.09B | $340M | $-335M |
| Gross Margin | 52.9% | 31.0% | 38.4% | 33.6% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 45.2% | 28.2% | 29.5% | 25.2% | -153.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.4x | 38.0x | 12.8x | 18.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $43.57B | $3.45B | $19.73B | $12.81B | $309M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.48B | $300M | $466M | $4.98B | $793M |
AER vs FTAI vs AL vs GATX vs FLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AerCap Holdings N.V. (AER) | 100 | 448.4 | +348.4% |
| FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) | 100 | 2770.1 | +2670.1% |
| Air Lease Corporati… (AL) | 100 | 215.7 | +115.7% |
| GATX Corporation (GATX) | 100 | 293.0 | +193.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AER vs FTAI vs AL vs GATX vs FLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AER has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 48.4% margin vs FLY's -181.1%
FTAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 43.2%, EPS growth 15.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 51.4%
- 33.8% 10Y total return vs GATX's 354.0%
- +136.9% vs FLY's -34.8%
- 12.4% ROA vs FLY's -26.6%, ROIC 16.8% vs -26.2%
AL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 0.93x
- PEG 0.79 vs GATX's 1.08
- Beta 0.33 vs FLY's 2.90
GATX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.4%
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.27x
- 1.4% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs AL's 1.3%
FLY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 163.0% revenue growth vs AER's 2.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 163.0% revenue growth vs AER's 2.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.4% margin vs FLY's -181.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs FLY's 2.90 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs AL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.9% vs FLY's -34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs FLY's -26.6%, ROIC 16.8% vs -26.2% |
AER vs FTAI vs AL vs GATX vs FLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AER vs FTAI vs AL vs GATX vs FLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AL leads in 2 of 6 categories
FTAI leads 2 • AER leads 1 • GATX leads 1 • FLY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AER is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.1B annually — 43.9x FLY's $185M. AER is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLY's -181.1%. On growth, FTAI holds the edge at +65.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.1B | $2.8B | $3.0B | $1.9B | $185M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.7B | $1.0B | $2.1B | $823M | -$263M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.9B | $537M | $1.1B | $340M | -$335M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $405M | -$1.4B | -$1.7B | -$497M | -$257M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | +31.0% | +38.4% | +33.6% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +28.2% | +29.5% | +25.2% | -153.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | +18.9% | +36.1% | +17.9% | -181.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | -48.8% | -57.4% | -26.1% | -139.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +65.5% | +15.1% | +38.4% | +44.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.5% | +48.3% | +81.9% | +9.3% | -21.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.8x trailing earnings, AER trades at a 88% valuation discount to FTAI's 57.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AL offers better value at 0.43x vs GATX's 1.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24.1B | $27.3B | $7.3B | $6.5B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66.2B | $30.5B | $6.8B | $14.4B | $5.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.79x | 57.87x | 7.00x | 20.16x | -8.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.41x | 37.96x | 12.76x | 18.30x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.43x | 1.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.60x | 30.59x | — | 14.55x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.95x | 10.89x | 2.41x | 3.75x | 39.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 82.73x | 0.86x | 1.81x | 2.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI delivers a 181.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $181 in annual profit, vs $-58 for FLY. FLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTAI's 10.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AER scores 8/9 vs GATX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.6% | +181.4% | +13.2% | +10.7% | -57.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | +12.4% | +3.3% | +2.2% | -26.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +16.8% | +4.2% | +3.7% | -26.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +20.1% | +5.0% | +4.1% | -26.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.38x | 10.32x | 2.33x | 3.52x | 0.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42.1B | $3.1B | $19.3B | $7.8B | -$484M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $300M | $466M | $5.0B | $793M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $43.6B | $3.4B | $19.7B | $12.8B | $309M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.42x | 3.46x | 6.32x | 1.04x | -36.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTAI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTAI five years ago would be worth $117,342 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,515 for FLY. Over the past 12 months, FTAI leads with a +136.9% total return vs FLY's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTAI at 112.6% vs FLY's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.2% | +26.7% | +1.7% | +8.0% | +65.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.9% | +136.9% | +18.8% | +25.2% | -34.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.4% | +861.0% | +77.3% | +71.8% | -34.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.5% | +1073.4% | +59.7% | +95.8% | -34.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +298.5% | +3379.1% | +140.2% | +354.0% | -34.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.7% | +112.6% | +21.0% | +19.8% | -13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
AL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AL is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLY's 2.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FLY's 53.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 2.01x | 0.33x | 0.73x | 2.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $154.94 | $323.51 | $65.00 | $205.56 | $73.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $105.65 | $108.47 | $51.66 | $143.46 | $16.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.3% | +82.3% | +100.0% | +89.4% | +53.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 60.5 | 66.3 | 45.3 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.5M | 2.5M | 189K | 6.2M |
Analyst Outlook
GATX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AER as "Buy", FTAI as "Buy", AL as "Buy", GATX as "Buy", FLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.7% upside for GATX (target: $220) vs 0.0% for AL (target: $65). For income investors, GATX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.36% vs FLY's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $165.00 | $314.83 | $65.00 | $220.00 | $39.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 18 | 20 | 14 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +0.5% | +1.3% | +1.4% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 13 | 19 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.09 | $1.23 | $0.87 | $2.51 | $0.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
AL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). FTAI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
AER vs FTAI vs AL vs GATX vs FLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AER or FTAI or AL or GATX or FLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Firefly Aerospace Inc.
(FLY) is the stronger pick with 163. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for AerCap Holdings N. V. (AER). AerCap Holdings N. V. (AER) offers the better valuation at 6. 8x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AerCap Holdings N. V. (AER) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AER or FTAI or AL or GATX or FLY?
On trailing P/E, AerCap Holdings N.
V. (AER) is the cheapest at 6. 8x versus FTAI Aviation Ltd. at 57. 9x. On forward P/E, AerCap Holdings N. V. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Air Lease Corporation wins at 0. 79x versus GATX Corporation's 1. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AER or FTAI or AL or GATX or FLY?
Over the past 5 years, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) delivered a total return of +1073%, compared to -34. 8% for Firefly Aerospace Inc. (FLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTAI returned +33. 8% versus FLY's -34. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AER or FTAI or AL or GATX or FLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus Firefly Aerospace Inc. 's 2. 90β — meaning FLY is approximately 769% more volatile than AL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Firefly Aerospace Inc. (FLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 10% for FTAI Aviation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AER or FTAI or AL or GATX or FLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Firefly Aerospace Inc.
(FLY) is pulling ahead at 163. 0% versus 2. 4% for AerCap Holdings N. V. (AER). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FTAI Aviation Ltd. grew EPS 1538% year-over-year, compared to -161. 0% for Firefly Aerospace Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTAI leads at 51. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AER or FTAI or AL or GATX or FLY?
AerCap Holdings N.
V. (AER) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 8% net margin versus -186. 6% for Firefly Aerospace Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AER leads at 51. 9% versus -154. 3% for FLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AER leads at 59. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AER or FTAI or AL or GATX or FLY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus GATX Corporation's 1. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, AerCap Holdings N. V. (AER) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 38. 0x for FTAI Aviation Ltd. — 29. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GATX: 19. 7% to $220. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AER or FTAI or AL or GATX or FLY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
GATX Corporation (GATX) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 2% for Firefly Aerospace Inc. (FLY).
09Is AER or FTAI or AL or GATX or FLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
33), 1. 3% yield, +140. 2% 10Y return). Firefly Aerospace Inc. (FLY) carries a higher beta of 2. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AL: +140. 2%, FLY: -34. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AER and FTAI and AL and GATX and FLY?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AER is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FTAI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AL is a small-cap deep-value stock; GATX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLY is a small-cap high-growth stock. AER, AL, GATX pay a dividend while FTAI, FLY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.