Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AFRM vs LC vs SOFI vs UPST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22.44B
5Y Perf.-32.4%
LC
LendingClub Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.+53.8%
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.40B
5Y Perf.-36.4%
UPST
Upstart Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.78B
5Y Perf.-53.4%

AFRM vs LC vs SOFI vs UPST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AFRM logoAFRM
LC logoLC
SOFI logoSOFI
UPST logoUPST
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$22.44B$1.92B$20.40B$2.78B
Revenue (TTM)$3.20B$1.33B$4.77B$1.08B
Net Income (TTM)$382M$136M$481M$49M
Gross Margin62.6%64.7%75.1%95.2%
Operating Margin10.2%25.0%11.0%5.1%
Forward P/E62.5x9.6x26.5x14.7x
Total Debt$7.85B$16M$1.82B$1.85B
Cash & Equiv.$1.35B$918M$4.93B$657M

AFRM vs LC vs SOFI vs UPSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AFRM
LC
SOFI
UPST
StockJan 21May 26Return
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)10067.6-32.4%
LendingClub Corpora… (LC)100153.8+53.8%
SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI)10063.6-36.4%
Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST)10046.6-53.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AFRM vs LC vs SOFI vs UPST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LC leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Affirm Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. UPST also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

AFRM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 11.9% margin vs UPST's 5.0%
  • 3.1% ROA vs SOFI's 1.1%, ROIC -0.7% vs 3.6%
Best for: quality and efficiency
LC
LendingClub Corporation
The Banking Pick

LC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.36
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 466.38x
  • Beta 2.36, current ratio 466.38x
  • NIM 5.4% vs SOFI's 4.4%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 52.7% 10Y total return vs LC's -27.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
UPST
Upstart Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

UPST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 58.9%, EPS growth 131.3%
  • 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUPST logoUPST58.9% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0%
ValueLC logoLCLower P/E (9.6x vs 14.7x)
Quality / MarginsAFRM logoAFRM11.9% margin vs UPST's 5.0%
Stability / SafetyLC logoLCBeta 2.36 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LC logoLC+62.4% vs UPST's -37.6%
Efficiency (ROA)AFRM logoAFRM3.1% ROA vs SOFI's 1.1%, ROIC -0.7% vs 3.6%

AFRM vs LC vs SOFI vs UPST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Merchant Network
79.2%$883M
Virtual Card Network
20.8%$231M
LCLendingClub Corporation
FY 2025
Financial Service
86.3%$373M
Servicing Fees
13.7%$59M
SOFISoFi Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Lending Segment
48.1%$1.8B
Financial Services Segment
40.1%$1.5B
Technology Platform Segment
11.7%$450M
UPSTUpstart Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Servicing Fees, Net
51.7%$157M
Servicing Fees
33.0%$100M
Borrower Fees
9.7%$29M
Collection Agency Fees
4.8%$14M
Other Fees
0.9%$3M

AFRM vs LC vs SOFI vs UPST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLCLAGGINGUPST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — AFRM and LC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 4.4x UPST's $1.1B. AFRM is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPST's 5.0%.

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.2B$1.3B$4.8B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$533M$287M$760M$68M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$382M$136M$481M$49M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$787M-$2.9B-$2.6B-$146M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.6%+64.7%+75.1%+95.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.2%+25.0%+11.0%+5.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.9%+10.2%+10.1%+5.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.6%-2.1%-83.5%-15.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-65.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.2%-56.7%-169.2%
Evenly matched — AFRM and LC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 14.5x trailing earnings, LC trades at a 97% valuation discount to AFRM's 449.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LC's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 210.0x.

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…
Market CapShares × price$22.4B$1.9B$20.4B$2.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$28.9B$1.0B$17.3B$4.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS449.07x14.51x41.03x64.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.62.49x9.56x26.45x14.69x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple209.99x2.57x22.75x50.13x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.96x1.44x4.28x2.58x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.48x1.32x1.91x3.90x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF37.29x
LC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AFRM delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for SOFI. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFRM's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AFRM scores 6/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.2%+9.5%+5.9%+6.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.1%+1.2%+1.1%+1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.7%+17.3%+3.6%+1.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.9%+3.3%+1.2%+2.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96635
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.56x0.01x0.17x2.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6.5B-$902M-$3.1B$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.4B$918M$4.9B$657M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7.9B$16M$1.8B$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.88x0.67x0.45x1.66x
LC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AFRM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AFRM five years ago would be worth $12,474 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,022 for UPST. Over the past 12 months, LC leads with a +62.4% total return vs UPST's -37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFRM at 78.0% vs UPST's 29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.0%-12.7%-41.7%-36.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+30.7%+62.4%+23.0%-37.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+464.2%+142.9%+192.5%+116.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+24.7%+15.1%-3.1%-69.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.7%-27.7%+52.7%-1.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+78.0%+34.4%+43.0%+29.4%
AFRM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LC is the less volatile stock with a 2.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LC currently trades 77.0% from its 52-week high vs UPST's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.72x2.36x2.54x2.96x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$100.00$21.67$32.73$87.30
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$42.09$9.70$12.56$23.96
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.4%+77.0%+48.9%+33.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.157.441.942.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.3M2.1M65.8M4.8M
LC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: AFRM as "Buy", LC as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold", UPST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.8% upside for UPST (target: $45) vs 19.9% for AFRM (target: $81).

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$80.77$22.75$20.89$45.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts33292722
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.1%0.0%+0.3%0.0%
LC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AFRM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallLendingClub Corporation (LC)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AFRM vs LC vs SOFI vs UPST: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AFRM or LC or SOFI or UPST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Upstart Holdings, Inc.

(UPST) is the stronger pick with 58. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). LendingClub Corporation (LC) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AFRM or LC or SOFI or UPST?

On trailing P/E, LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the cheapest at 14.

5x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 449. 1x. On forward P/E, LendingClub Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AFRM or LC or SOFI or UPST?

Over the past 5 years, Affirm Holdings, Inc.

(AFRM) delivered a total return of +24. 7%, compared to -69. 8% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOFI returned +52. 7% versus AFRM's -30. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AFRM or LC or SOFI or UPST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

36β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning UPST is approximately 25% more volatile than LC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AFRM or LC or SOFI or UPST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upstart Holdings, Inc.

(UPST) is pulling ahead at 58. 9% versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingClub Corporation grew EPS 155. 6% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SoFi Technologies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AFRM or LC or SOFI or UPST?

LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

2% net margin versus 1. 6% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LC leads at 25. 0% versus -2. 7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AFRM or LC or SOFI or UPST more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, LendingClub Corporation (LC) trades at 9.

6x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 52. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPST: 55. 8% to $45. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AFRM or LC or SOFI or UPST?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AFRM or LC or SOFI or UPST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SoFi Technologies, Inc.

(SOFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOFI: +52. 7%, AFRM: -30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AFRM and LC and SOFI and UPST?

These companies operate in different sectors (AFRM (Technology) and LC (Financial Services) and SOFI (Financial Services) and UPST (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AFRM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AFRM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LC

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SOFI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UPST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Gross Margin > 57%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AFRM and LC and SOFI and UPST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AFRM: -65.8% · LC: 15.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(AFRM: 11.9% · LC: 10.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AFRM: 449.1x · LC: 14.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.