AHH
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.
REIT - Diversified
Market Cap$515M
5Y Perf.-50.2%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AHH vs NXRT vs UE vs PECO vs ELME
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
REIT - Residential
Market Cap$756M
5Y Perf.-27.4%
UE
Urban Edge Properties
REIT - Diversified
Market Cap$2.78B
5Y Perf.+33.5%
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
REIT - Retail
Market Cap$5.04B
5Y Perf.+596.5%
ELME
Elme Communities
REIT - Office
Market Cap$188M
5Y Perf.-90.6%
AHH vs NXRT vs UE vs PECO vs ELME — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AHH | NXRT | UE | PECO | ELME |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Residential | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $515M | $756M | $2.78B | $5.04B | $188M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $325M | $252M | $486M | $739M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $-32M | $108M | $115M | $-154M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | 91.1% | 25.3% | 71.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 11.5% | 29.0% | 37.6% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 47.5x | 53.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.65B | $1.56B | $1.67B | $2.49B | $520M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $14M | $49M | $4M | $1.33B |
AHH vs NXRT vs UE vs PECO vs ELME — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AHH
NXRT
UE
PECO
ELME
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armada Hoffler Prop… (AHH) | 100 | 49.8 | -50.2% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 72.6 | -27.4% |
| Urban Edge Properti… (UE) | 100 | 133.5 | +33.5% |
| Phillips Edison & C… (PECO) | 100 | 696.5 | +596.5% |
| Elme Communities (ELME) | 100 | 9.4 | -90.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AHH vs NXRT vs UE vs PECO vs ELME
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: UE leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. ELME also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AHH
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.
The REIT Holding
AHH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: real estate exposure
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
The REIT Holding
Among these 5 stocks, NXRT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: real estate exposure
UE
Urban Edge Properties
The Real Estate Income Play
UE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (47.5x vs 53.8x)
- 22.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
- +23.9% vs NXRT's -15.2%
- 3.2% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 3.2% vs -15.3%
Best for: value and quality
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
PECO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 74.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 96.3%, current ratio 0.66x
- 10.7% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ELME
Elme Communities
The Real Estate Income Play
ELME ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 34.1%
- Beta 0.47, yield 34.1%, current ratio 1.02x
- 34.1% yield, vs NXRT's 7.1%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PECO | 10.7% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0% |
| Value | UE | Lower P/E (47.5x vs 53.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | UE | 22.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% |
| Stability / Safety | PECO | Beta 0.27 vs AHH's 0.70, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ELME | 34.1% yield, vs NXRT's 7.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | UE | +23.9% vs NXRT's -15.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UE | 3.2% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 3.2% vs -15.3% |
AHH vs NXRT vs UE vs PECO vs ELME — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2017
FY 2024
AHH vs NXRT vs UE vs PECO vs ELME — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLUELAGGINGELME
Who Leads Where
UE leads in 3 of 6 categories
AHH leads 1 • NXRT leads 0 • PECO leads 0 • ELME leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓ELMEElme Communities
0leads
PECOPhillips Edison & Com…
0leads
NXRTNexPoint Residential …
0leads
AHHArmada Hoffler Proper…
1leads
UEUrban Edge Properties
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AHHvs NXRTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
UE4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
AHH3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
UE5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
UE4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PECO and ELME operate at a comparable scale, with $739M and $0 in trailing revenue. UE is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, UE holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | PECOPhillips Edison &… | ELMEElme Communities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $325M | $252M | $486M | $739M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $172M | $125M | $276M | $542M | -$44M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | -$32M | $108M | $115M | -$154M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $54M | $79M | $189M | $207M | $62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.3% | +91.1% | +25.3% | +71.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +11.5% | +29.0% | +37.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | -12.7% | +22.2% | +15.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +31.2% | +38.9% | +28.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -54.4% | +0.5% | +12.2% | +7.0% | -4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | 0.0% | +157.1% | +14.3% | -6.6% |
UE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
AHH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.8x trailing earnings, UE trades at a 34% valuation discount to PECO's 45.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AHH's 12.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXRT's 18.6x.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | PECOPhillips Edison &… | ELMEElme Communities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $515M | $756M | $2.8B | $5.0B | $188M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $2.3B | $4.4B | $7.5B | -$624M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -49.46x | -23.65x | 29.78x | 45.00x | -1.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 47.53x | 53.84x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.57x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.22x | 18.60x | 16.55x | 16.20x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 3.01x | 5.88x | 6.89x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 2.52x | 2.02x | 2.15x | 0.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.02x | 9.05x | 15.20x | 23.80x | 3.03x |
AHH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UE delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-19 for ELME. PECO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UE scores 8/9 vs ELME's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | PECOPhillips Edison &… | ELMEElme Communities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | -10.1% | +7.8% | +4.5% | -18.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | -1.7% | +3.2% | +2.0% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +1.1% | +3.2% | +3.0% | -15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +1.5% | +3.9% | +4.0% | -10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.99x | 5.18x | 1.21x | 0.96x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $2.5B | -$812M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $14M | $49M | $4M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $2.5B | $520M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.99x | 0.47x | 2.28x | 2.17x | -3.82x |
UE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PECO five years ago would be worth $74,018 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,343 for AHH. Over the past 12 months, UE leads with a +23.9% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UE at 18.6% vs AHH's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | PECOPhillips Edison &… | ELMEElme Communities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +2.6% | +16.5% | +14.8% | -4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.5% | -15.2% | +23.9% | +16.4% | +8.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.3% | -15.5% | +66.7% | +44.0% | +13.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.6% | -23.0% | +31.8% | +640.2% | -15.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.0% | +211.1% | +6.1% | +693.0% | -11.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.3% | -5.5% | +18.6% | +12.9% | +4.2% |
UE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UE and PECO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PECO is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AHH's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UE currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs ELME's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | PECOPhillips Edison &… | ELMEElme Communities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.62x | 0.48x | 0.27x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.71 | $38.30 | $22.26 | $40.71 | $17.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.14 | $23.79 | $17.46 | $32.84 | $1.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.4% | +77.8% | +99.0% | +98.4% | +12.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 71.0 | 61.6 | 63.0 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 319K | 216K | 891K | 822K | 1.2M |
Evenly matched — UE and PECO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AHH as "Hold", NXRT as "Hold", UE as "Hold", PECO as "Buy", ELME as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 796.2% upside for ELME (target: $19) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, ELME offers the higher dividend yield at 34.11% vs PECO's 2.83%.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | PECOPhillips Edison &… | ELMEElme Communities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.25 | $27.00 | $21.00 | $39.60 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 10 | 7 | 14 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.5% | +7.1% | +3.4% | +2.8% | +34.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.74 | $2.11 | $0.76 | $1.13 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — NXRT and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
UE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AHH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallUrban Edge Properties (UE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AHH vs NXRT vs UE vs PECO vs ELME: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AHH or NXRT or UE or PECO or ELME a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). Urban Edge Properties (UE) offers the better valuation at 29. 8x trailing P/E (47. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AHH or NXRT or UE or PECO or ELME?
On trailing P/E, Urban Edge Properties (UE) is the cheapest at 29.
8x versus Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. at 45. 0x. On forward P/E, Urban Edge Properties is actually cheaper at 47. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AHH or NXRT or UE or PECO or ELME?
Over the past 5 years, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) delivered a total return of +640. 2%, compared to -26. 6% for Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PECO returned +693. 0% versus ELME's -11. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AHH or NXRT or UE or PECO or ELME?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. 's 0. 70β — meaning AHH is approximately 158% more volatile than PECO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 96% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AHH or NXRT or UE or PECO or ELME?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. grew EPS 74. 5% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PECO leads at 8. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AHH or NXRT or UE or PECO or ELME?
Urban Edge Properties (UE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
8% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AHH leads at 28. 7% versus 0. 0% for ELME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AHH or NXRT or UE or PECO or ELME more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Urban Edge Properties (UE) trades at 47.
5x forward P/E versus 53. 8x for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ELME: 796. 2% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AHH or NXRT or UE or PECO or ELME?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Elme Communities (ELME) offers the highest yield at 34. 1%, versus 2. 8% for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO).
09Is AHH or NXRT or UE or PECO or ELME better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 2. 8% yield, +693. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PECO: +693. 0%, AHH: +12. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AHH and NXRT and UE and PECO and ELME?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AHH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PECO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ELME is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AHH: -54.4% · NXRT: 0.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.