AHH
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.
REIT - Diversified
Market Cap$515M
5Y Perf.-50.2%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AHH vs UE vs KIM vs PECO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
UE
Urban Edge Properties
REIT - Diversified
Market Cap$2.78B
5Y Perf.+33.5%
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
REIT - Retail
Market Cap$15.87B
5Y Perf.+28.4%
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
REIT - Retail
Market Cap$5.04B
5Y Perf.+596.5%
AHH vs UE vs KIM vs PECO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AHH | UE | KIM | PECO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $515M | $2.78B | $15.87B | $5.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $325M | $486M | $2.16B | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $108M | $616M | $115M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | 25.3% | 54.7% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 29.0% | 36.1% | 37.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 47.5x | 30.5x | 53.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.65B | $1.67B | $8.64B | $2.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $49M | $213M | $4M |
AHH vs UE vs KIM vs PECO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AHH
UE
KIM
PECO
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armada Hoffler Prop… (AHH) | 100 | 49.8 | -50.2% |
| Urban Edge Properti… (UE) | 100 | 133.5 | +33.5% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 100 | 128.4 | +28.4% |
| Phillips Edison & C… (PECO) | 100 | 696.5 | +596.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AHH vs UE vs KIM vs PECO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: UE and KIM are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Kimco Realty Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. PECO and AHH also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AHH
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
AHH is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 11.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UE's 3.4%
Best for: dividends
UE
Urban Edge Properties
The Real Estate Income Play
UE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 3.4%
- Beta 0.48, yield 3.4%, current ratio 2.54x
- +23.9% vs AHH's +1.5%
- 3.2% ROA vs AHH's -0.9%, ROIC 3.2% vs 2.6%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play
KIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (30.5x vs 53.8x)
- 28.5% margin vs AHH's -6.9%
Best for: value and quality
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
PECO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 74.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs AHH's 12.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 96.3%, current ratio 0.66x
- 10.7% FFO/revenue growth vs AHH's -59.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PECO | 10.7% FFO/revenue growth vs AHH's -59.7% |
| Value | KIM | Lower P/E (30.5x vs 53.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | KIM | 28.5% margin vs AHH's -6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | PECO | Beta 0.27 vs AHH's 0.70, lower leverage |
| Dividends | AHH | 11.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UE's 3.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | UE | +23.9% vs AHH's +1.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UE | 3.2% ROA vs AHH's -0.9%, ROIC 3.2% vs 2.6% |
AHH vs UE vs KIM vs PECO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2018
FY 2017
AHH vs UE vs KIM vs PECO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLUELAGGINGPECO
Who Leads Where
UE leads in 2 of 6 categories
AHH leads 1 • KIM leads 0 • PECO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓PECOPhillips Edison & Com…
0leads
KIMKimco Realty Corporat…
0leads
AHHArmada Hoffler Proper…
1leads
UEUrban Edge Properties
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AHHvs KIMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
AHH4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
UE4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
UE3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — UE and KIM and PECO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 6.6x AHH's $325M. KIM is the more profitable business, keeping 28.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AHH's -6.9%. On growth, UE holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | PECOPhillips Edison &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $325M | $486M | $2.2B | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $172M | $276M | $1.4B | $542M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | $108M | $616M | $115M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $54M | $189M | $844M | $207M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.3% | +25.3% | +54.7% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +29.0% | +36.1% | +37.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +22.2% | +28.5% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +38.9% | +39.0% | +28.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -54.4% | +12.2% | +4.0% | +7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | +157.1% | +27.8% | +14.3% |
Evenly matched — UE and KIM and PECO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
AHH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.3x trailing earnings, KIM trades at a 37% valuation discount to PECO's 45.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AHH's 12.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KIM's 17.7x.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | PECOPhillips Edison &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $515M | $2.8B | $15.9B | $5.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $4.4B | $24.3B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -49.46x | 29.78x | 28.35x | 45.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 47.53x | 30.48x | 53.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.22x | 16.55x | 17.70x | 16.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 5.88x | 7.41x | 6.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 2.02x | 1.50x | 2.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.02x | 15.20x | 20.54x | 23.80x |
AHH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UE delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AHH. KIM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AHH's 1.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UE scores 8/9 vs AHH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | PECOPhillips Edison &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +7.8% | +5.8% | +4.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | +3.2% | +3.1% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +3.9% | +3.9% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.99x | 1.21x | 0.82x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $1.6B | $8.4B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $49M | $213M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $1.7B | $8.6B | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.99x | 2.28x | 2.46x | 2.17x |
UE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PECO five years ago would be worth $74,018 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,343 for AHH. Over the past 12 months, UE leads with a +23.9% total return vs AHH's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UE at 18.6% vs AHH's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | PECOPhillips Edison &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +16.5% | +18.6% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.5% | +23.9% | +18.9% | +16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.3% | +66.7% | +43.6% | +44.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.6% | +31.8% | +31.1% | +640.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.0% | +6.1% | +11.1% | +693.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.3% | +18.6% | +12.8% | +12.9% |
UE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UE and PECO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PECO is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AHH's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UE currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs AHH's 83.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | PECOPhillips Edison &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.48x | 0.54x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.71 | $22.26 | $24.31 | $40.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.14 | $17.46 | $19.76 | $32.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.4% | +99.0% | +96.8% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 61.6 | 58.4 | 63.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 319K | 891K | 5.0M | 822K |
Evenly matched — UE and PECO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AHH and UE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AHH as "Hold", UE as "Hold", KIM as "Hold", PECO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.3% upside for AHH (target: $8) vs -4.7% for UE (target: $21). For income investors, AHH offers the higher dividend yield at 11.48% vs PECO's 2.83%.
| Metric | AHHArmada Hoffler Pr… | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | PECOPhillips Edison &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.25 | $21.00 | $24.25 | $39.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 7 | 36 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.5% | +3.4% | +4.5% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.74 | $0.76 | $1.06 | $1.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — AHH and UE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
UE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AHH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Best OverallUrban Edge Properties (UE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AHH vs UE vs KIM vs PECO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AHH or UE or KIM or PECO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -59. 7% for Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH). Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) offers the better valuation at 28. 3x trailing P/E (30. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AHH or UE or KIM or PECO?
On trailing P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the cheapest at 28.
3x versus Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. at 45. 0x. On forward P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 30. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AHH or UE or KIM or PECO?
Over the past 5 years, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) delivered a total return of +640. 2%, compared to -26. 6% for Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PECO returned +693. 0% versus UE's +6. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AHH or UE or KIM or PECO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. 's 0. 70β — meaning AHH is approximately 158% more volatile than PECO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 199% for Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AHH or UE or KIM or PECO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -59. 7% for Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. grew EPS 74. 5% year-over-year, compared to -138. 2% for Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PECO leads at 8. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AHH or UE or KIM or PECO?
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 0% for Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KIM leads at 35. 2% versus 26. 8% for UE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AHH leads at 67. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AHH or UE or KIM or PECO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) trades at 30.
5x forward P/E versus 53. 8x for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. — 23. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AHH: 28. 3% to $8. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — AHH or UE or KIM or PECO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH) offers the highest yield at 11. 5%, versus 2. 8% for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO).
09Is AHH or UE or KIM or PECO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 2. 8% yield, +693. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PECO: +693. 0%, AHH: +12. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AHH and UE and KIM and PECO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AHH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KIM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PECO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AHH: -54.4% · UE: 12.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.