Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALIT vs CNXN vs PCTY vs ACN vs NOW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Software - Application
ALIT vs CNXN vs PCTY vs ACN vs NOW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Technology Distributors | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $455M | $1.65B | $5.93B | $112.19B | $96.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.25B | $2.89B | $1.73B | $72.11B | $13.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.09B | $87M | $258M | $7.68B | $1.76B |
| Gross Margin | 20.2% | 18.8% | 69.3% | 32.0% | 76.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 3.9% | 21.3% | 14.8% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 3.0x | 17.0x | 14.3x | 13.0x | 21.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.00B | $996K | $218M | $8.18B | $3.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $273M | $193M | $398M | $11.48B | $3.73B |
ALIT vs CNXN vs PCTY vs ACN vs NOW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alight, Inc. (ALIT) | 100 | 9.1 | -90.9% |
| PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) | 100 | 152.5 | +52.5% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 83.3 | -16.7% |
| Accenture plc (ACN) | 100 | 80.3 | -19.7% |
| ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) | 100 | 20.8 | -79.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALIT vs CNXN vs PCTY vs ACN vs NOW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALIT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (3.0x vs 13.0x)
- 18.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ACN's 3.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
CNXN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 199.0% 10Y total return vs PCTY's 218.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.83, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.90x
- -2.4% vs NOW's -90.5%
PCTY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and stability is your priority.
- 14.9% margin vs ALIT's -137.5%
- Beta 0.43 vs NOW's 1.46, lower leverage
ACN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 3.2%
- 11.8% ROA vs ALIT's -58.3%, ROIC 26.8% vs 0.6%
NOW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 20.9%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
- PEG 0.32 vs CNXN's 1.88
- 20.9% revenue growth vs ALIT's -3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.9% revenue growth vs ALIT's -3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.0x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs ALIT's -137.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs NOW's 1.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ACN's 3.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.4% vs NOW's -90.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs ALIT's -58.3%, ROIC 26.8% vs 0.6% |
ALIT vs CNXN vs PCTY vs ACN vs NOW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALIT vs CNXN vs PCTY vs ACN vs NOW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NOW leads in 1 of 6 categories
ALIT leads 1 • ACN leads 1 • CNXN leads 1 • PCTY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NOW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACN is the larger business by revenue, generating $72.1B annually — 41.7x PCTY's $1.7B. PCTY is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALIT's -137.5%. On growth, NOW holds the edge at +22.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $2.9B | $1.7B | $72.1B | $14.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | $127M | $394M | $12.1B | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.1B | $87M | $258M | $7.7B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $259M | $124M | $470M | $12.5B | $4.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +18.8% | +69.3% | +32.0% | +76.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +3.9% | +21.3% | +14.8% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -137.5% | +3.0% | +14.9% | +10.7% | +12.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +4.3% | +27.2% | +17.3% | +33.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +3.0% | +10.5% | +8.3% | +22.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.4% | +33.3% | +26.7% | +3.9% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ALIT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, ACN trades at a 74% valuation discount to NOW's 56.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NOW offers better value at 0.81x vs CNXN's 2.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $455M | $1.6B | $5.9B | $112.2B | $97.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $1.5B | $5.8B | $108.9B | $96.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.15x | 19.98x | 27.14x | 14.83x | 56.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.98x | 16.98x | 14.29x | 13.00x | 21.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.21x | 0.96x | 1.64x | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.96x | 12.44x | 14.25x | 8.60x | 37.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.57x | 3.72x | 1.61x | 7.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | 1.82x | 5.00x | 3.53x | 7.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.82x | 28.39x | 17.31x | 10.32x | 21.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACN delivers a 23.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-172 for ALIT. CNXN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALIT's 1.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs NOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -171.7% | +9.7% | +22.4% | +23.9% | +15.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -58.3% | +6.5% | +4.9% | +11.8% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +10.6% | +26.2% | +26.8% | +12.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +11.0% | +23.3% | +24.9% | +13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.92x | 0.00x | 0.18x | 0.25x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | -$192M | -$180M | -$3.3B | -$523M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $273M | $193M | $398M | $11.5B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $996,000 | $218M | $8.2B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.64x | — | 23.29x | 40.67x | 185.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNXN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNXN five years ago would be worth $14,507 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,062 for ALIT. Over the past 12 months, CNXN leads with a -2.4% total return vs NOW's -90.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNXN at 19.8% vs ALIT's -50.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.8% | +15.2% | -25.1% | -29.4% | -36.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -81.1% | -2.4% | -40.6% | -39.1% | -90.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.2% | +71.7% | -37.1% | -25.5% | -78.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.4% | +45.1% | -35.2% | -29.5% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.7% | +199.0% | +218.2% | +89.9% | +38.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.9% | +19.8% | -14.3% | -9.3% | -40.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNXN and PCTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOW's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNXN currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs NOW's 8.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 0.81x | 0.39x | 0.80x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.11 | $71.17 | $201.97 | $325.71 | $1057.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $54.97 | $92.99 | $173.52 | $81.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.2% | +91.8% | +54.0% | +55.3% | +8.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 60.7 | 45.7 | 33.5 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34.3M | 66K | 733K | 5.7M | 21.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ALIT and ACN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALIT as "Buy", CNXN as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy", ACN as "Buy", NOW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 331.9% upside for ALIT (target: $4) vs 35.4% for PCTY (target: $148). For income investors, ALIT offers the higher dividend yield at 18.77% vs CNXN's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.75 | — | $147.73 | $299.92 | $154.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 1 | 41 | 53 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +18.8% | +0.9% | — | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | — | 14 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $0.60 | — | $5.85 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +14.3% | +4.6% | +2.5% | +4.1% | +1.9% |
NOW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ALIT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ALIT vs CNXN vs PCTY vs ACN vs NOW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALIT or CNXN or PCTY or ACN or NOW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ServiceNow, Inc.
(NOW) is the stronger pick with 20. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for Alight, Inc. (ALIT). Accenture plc (ACN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alight, Inc. (ALIT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALIT or CNXN or PCTY or ACN or NOW?
On trailing P/E, Accenture plc (ACN) is the cheapest at 14.
8x versus ServiceNow, Inc. at 56. 0x. On forward P/E, Alight, Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ServiceNow, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus PC Connection, Inc. 's 1. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALIT or CNXN or PCTY or ACN or NOW?
Over the past 5 years, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) delivered a total return of +45. 1%, compared to -89. 4% for Alight, Inc. (ALIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PCTY returned +223. 7% versus ALIT's -89. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALIT or CNXN or PCTY or ACN or NOW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Alight, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning ALIT is approximately 257% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 192% for Alight, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALIT or CNXN or PCTY or ACN or NOW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ServiceNow, Inc.
(NOW) is pulling ahead at 20. 9% versus -3. 0% for Alight, Inc. (ALIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ServiceNow, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1924. 1% for Alight, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PCTY leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALIT or CNXN or PCTY or ACN or NOW?
Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
2% net margin versus -136. 9% for Alight, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PCTY leads at 19. 1% versus 1. 5% for ALIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NOW leads at 77. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALIT or CNXN or PCTY or ACN or NOW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus PC Connection, Inc. 's 1. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Alight, Inc. (ALIT) trades at 3. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for ServiceNow, Inc. — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALIT: 331. 9% to $3. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALIT or CNXN or PCTY or ACN or NOW?
In this comparison, ALIT (18.
8% yield), ACN (3. 2% yield), CNXN (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. PCTY, NOW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALIT or CNXN or PCTY or ACN or NOW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 0. 9% yield, +204. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNXN: +204. 6%, NOW: +35. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALIT and CNXN and PCTY and ACN and NOW?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALIT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CNXN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NOW is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ALIT, CNXN, ACN pay a dividend while PCTY, NOW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.