Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ANGI vs TRMK vs HOMB vs YELP vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Internet Content & Information
Banks - Regional
ANGI vs TRMK vs HOMB vs YELP vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Internet Content & Information | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $210M | $2.64B | $5.29B | $1.69B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.02B | $1.12B | $1.45B | $1.47B | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $224M | $458M | $139M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 91.1% | 71.0% | 65.6% | 90.0% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 25.5% | 36.0% | 12.4% | -84.2% |
| Forward P/E | 6.1x | 11.5x | 10.8x | 13.7x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $498M | $1.12B | $1.20B | $42M | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $304M | $668M | $910M | $216M | $380M |
ANGI vs TRMK vs HOMB vs YELP vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angi Inc. (ANGI) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANGI vs TRMK vs HOMB vs YELP vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANGI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 13.7x)
TRMK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 127.7% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 58.2%
- PEG 1.42 vs HOMB's 3.55
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
- +32.5% vs ANGI's -65.4%
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- 27.7% margin vs SFNC's -63.4%
- Beta 0.82 vs ANGI's 1.85, lower leverage
YELP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 19.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.99x
- 14.1% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 25.1% vs -9.1%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 13.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.7% margin vs SFNC's -63.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs ANGI's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs ANGI's -65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.1% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 25.1% vs -9.1% |
ANGI vs TRMK vs HOMB vs YELP vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ANGI vs TRMK vs HOMB vs YELP vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ANGI leads in 1 of 6 categories
YELP leads 1 • TRMK leads 1 • HOMB leads 0 • SFNC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YELP is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.3x SFNC's $627M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%. On growth, YELP holds the edge at +0.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $86M | $323M | $601M | $236M | -$497M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $224M | $458M | $139M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $230M | $354M | $281M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.1% | +71.0% | +65.6% | +90.0% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +12.4% | -84.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +20.0% | +27.7% | +9.5% | -63.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +20.7% | +29.1% | +19.1% | +71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | — | — | +0.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -163.3% | +5.4% | +26.0% | -16.7% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ANGI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, ANGI trades at a 58% valuation discount to HOMB's 13.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $210M | $2.6B | $5.3B | $1.7B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $404M | $3.1B | $5.6B | $1.5B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.57x | 12.13x | 13.36x | 12.71x | -7.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.10x | 11.50x | 10.82x | 13.74x | 10.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.50x | 4.39x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.22x | 9.49x | 10.12x | 6.18x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 2.36x | 3.64x | 1.15x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.26x | 1.28x | 1.36x | 2.61x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.62x | 11.39x | 12.53x | 5.23x | 6.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. YELP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANGI's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRMK scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | +10.8% | +10.9% | +19.7% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.2% | +2.0% | +14.1% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +7.1% | +7.2% | +25.1% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +3.2% | +9.8% | +22.9% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.53x | 0.30x | 0.06x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $194M | $448M | $292M | -$174M | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $304M | $668M | $910M | $216M | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $498M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $42M | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.38x | 0.75x | 1.44x | — | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMK five years ago would be worth $14,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $386 for ANGI. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +32.5% total return vs ANGI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 29.8% vs ANGI's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -58.6% | +15.5% | -3.0% | -5.7% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -65.4% | +32.5% | -1.9% | -19.9% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.5% | +118.5% | +42.0% | +1.6% | +53.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | +47.6% | +6.6% | -27.9% | -15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.1% | +127.7% | +58.2% | +10.2% | +25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.1% | +29.8% | +12.4% | +0.5% | +15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRMK and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ANGI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs ANGI's 27.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 0.94x | 0.82x | 0.82x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.42 | $45.99 | $30.83 | $41.22 | $22.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.53 | $33.39 | $25.68 | $19.60 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.0% | +97.6% | +87.1% | +69.1% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.1 | 56.0 | 50.3 | 57.2 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 392K | 1.4M | 1.1M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ANGI as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", YELP as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 143.3% upside for ANGI (target: $13) vs -0.5% for YELP (target: $28). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs TRMK's 2.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.75 | $45.50 | $32.00 | $28.33 | $22.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 54 | 9 | 19 | 67 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% | +2.8% | — | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 21 | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.97 | $0.75 | — | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +70.7% | +3.0% | +1.6% | +17.3% | 0.0% |
ANGI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). YELP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ANGI vs TRMK vs HOMB vs YELP vs SFNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANGI or TRMK or HOMB or YELP or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Angi Inc. (ANGI) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANGI or TRMK or HOMB or YELP or SFNC?
On trailing P/E, Angi Inc.
(ANGI) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Angi Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANGI or TRMK or HOMB or YELP or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +47.
6%, compared to -96. 1% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 7% versus ANGI's -94. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANGI or TRMK or HOMB or YELP or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Angi Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning ANGI is approximately 126% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yelp Inc. (YELP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 54% for Angi Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANGI or TRMK or HOMB or YELP or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Angi Inc. grew EPS 32. 4% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, YELP leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANGI or TRMK or HOMB or YELP or SFNC?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANGI leads at 90. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANGI or TRMK or HOMB or YELP or SFNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Angi Inc. (ANGI) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for Yelp Inc. — 7. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANGI: 143. 3% to $12. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANGI or TRMK or HOMB or YELP or SFNC?
In this comparison, SFNC (4.
0% yield), HOMB (2. 8% yield), TRMK (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ANGI, YELP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ANGI or TRMK or HOMB or YELP or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 8% yield). Angi Inc. (ANGI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +58. 2%, ANGI: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANGI and TRMK and HOMB and YELP and SFNC?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANGI (Communication Services) and TRMK (Financial Services) and HOMB (Financial Services) and YELP (Communication Services) and SFNC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ANGI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. TRMK, HOMB, SFNC pay a dividend while ANGI, YELP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.