Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
APM vs AYTU vs SUPN vs CASI vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
APM vs AYTU vs SUPN vs CASI vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $5M | $16M | $3.01B | $2M | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $431K | $63M | $777M | $27M | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-24M | $-29M | $-49M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | -318.7% | 66.0% | 89.4% | 35.8% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -33.5% | -13.9% | -5.5% | -168.0% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.1x | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $23M | $41M | $22M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $874K | $31M | $128M | $13M | $1.98B |
APM vs AYTU vs SUPN vs CASI vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aptorum Group Limit… (APM) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 216.7 | +116.7% |
| CASI Pharmaceutical… (CASI) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APM vs AYTU vs SUPN vs CASI vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, APM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AYTU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +104.1% vs CASI's -91.2%
SUPN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 228.4% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 1.90x
- Beta 0.78, current ratio 1.90x
- 8.6% revenue growth vs APM's -100.0%
CASI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 31.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 8.3% margin vs APM's -16.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs APM's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs APM's -16.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs APM's 1.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 31.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +104.1% vs CASI's -91.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs CASI's -131.5%, ROIC 8.7% vs -153.0% |
APM vs AYTU vs SUPN vs CASI vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
APM vs AYTU vs SUPN vs CASI vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories
SUPN leads 1 • APM leads 0 • AYTU leads 0 • CASI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SUPN and IQV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 38555.5x APM's $431,378. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to APM's -16.4%. On growth, SUPN holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $431,378 | $63M | $777M | $27M | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | -$4M | $29M | -$44M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$24M | -$29M | -$49M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$698,000 | $82M | $0 | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +66.0% | +89.4% | +35.8% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.5% | -13.9% | -5.5% | -168.0% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | -39.0% | -3.7% | -183.9% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.8% | -1.1% | +10.6% | -103.2% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -6.5% | +38.6% | -60.5% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -156.9% | -3.0% | +81.0% | -23.6% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IQV's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUPN's 53.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $16M | $3.0B | $2M | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $7M | $2.9B | $11M | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.08x | -1.14x | -76.88x | -0.06x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 24.12x | — | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 53.44x | — | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.23x | 4.19x | 0.08x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 0.82x | 2.78x | 1.25x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 65.45x | — | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CASI. SUPN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CASI's 11.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SUPN scores 4/9 vs APM's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.2% | -172.1% | -2.7% | -3.0% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.0% | -20.0% | -2.0% | -131.5% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.3% | -33.5% | -2.8% | -153.0% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.0% | -13.3% | -3.4% | -104.6% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 1.21x | 0.04x | 11.96x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$8M | -$87M | $9M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $874,238 | $31M | $128M | $13M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $23M | $41M | $22M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -30.72x | -7.96x | — | -66.88x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SUPN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUPN five years ago would be worth $17,801 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $94 for CASI. Over the past 12 months, AYTU leads with a +104.1% total return vs CASI's -91.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUPN at 12.4% vs CASI's -60.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.5% | -10.8% | +5.7% | -81.6% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.6% | +104.1% | +69.0% | -91.2% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.9% | +40.3% | +42.1% | -94.0% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | -97.8% | +78.0% | -99.1% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -100.0% | +228.4% | -99.0% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.7% | +12.0% | +12.4% | -60.8% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SUPN and CASI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CASI is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APM's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SUPN currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs CASI's 4.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 1.27x | 0.78x | -0.12x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.47 | $3.07 | $59.68 | $3.09 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.65 | $1.20 | $29.16 | $0.05 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.8% | +80.5% | +87.6% | +4.9% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 48.9 | 57.9 | 24.2 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 42K | 604K | 146K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SUPN as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.3% upside for IQV (target: $226) vs 14.8% for SUPN (target: $60). CASI is the only dividend payer here at 31.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $60.00 | — | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 14 | — | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +31.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.05 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SUPN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
APM vs AYTU vs SUPN vs CASI vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APM or AYTU or SUPN or CASI or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Aptorum Group Limited (APM). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APM or AYTU or SUPN or CASI or IQV?
On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APM or AYTU or SUPN or CASI or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) delivered a total return of +78. 0%, compared to -99. 1% for CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CASI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUPN returned +228. 4% versus AYTU's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APM or AYTU or SUPN or CASI or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CASI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 12β versus Aptorum Group Limited's 1. 60β — meaning APM is approximately -1402% more volatile than CASI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 12% for CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APM or AYTU or SUPN or CASI or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -100. 0% for Aptorum Group Limited (APM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aytu BioPharma, Inc. grew EPS 24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -151. 5% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQV leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APM or AYTU or SUPN or CASI or IQV?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -1644. 3% for Aptorum Group Limited — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus -33. 5% for APM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUPN leads at 89. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APM or AYTU or SUPN or CASI or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IQV: 26. 3% to $225. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — APM or AYTU or SUPN or CASI or IQV?
In this comparison, CASI (31.
1% yield) pays a dividend. APM, AYTU, SUPN, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APM or AYTU or SUPN or CASI or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CASI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 12), 31. 1% yield). Aptorum Group Limited (APM) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CASI: -99. 0%, APM: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APM and AYTU and SUPN and CASI and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: APM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AYTU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CASI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CASI pays a dividend while APM, AYTU, SUPN, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.