Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AQST vs DARE vs AYTU vs PRAX vs LQDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
AQST vs DARE vs AYTU vs PRAX vs LQDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $516M | $25M | $16M | $9.63B | $3.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45M | $-57K | $63M | $-92K | $69M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-84M | $-17M | $-24M | $-327M | $-122M |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | -1461.1% | 66.0% | — | 89.4% |
| Operating Margin | -159.5% | -2396.9% | -13.9% | — | -155.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $131M | $1M | $23M | $110K | $122M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121M | $16M | $31M | $357M | $176M |
AQST vs DARE vs AYTU vs PRAX vs LQDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aquestive Therapeut… (AQST) | 100 | 87.4 | -12.6% |
| Daré Bioscience, In… (DARE) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
| Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) | 100 | 915.2 | +815.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AQST vs DARE vs AYTU vs PRAX vs LQDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AQST lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- beta 0.48
- Beta 0.48 vs PRAX's 1.55
AYTU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.8%, EPS growth 24.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.8%
- 1.8% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- -20.0% ROA vs AQST's -64.5%
PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 2.4% margin vs DARE's -414.3%
- +7.7% vs DARE's +0.7%
LQDA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 280.9% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, current ratio 4.43x
- Beta 1.24, current ratio 4.43x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.8% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs DARE's -414.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs DARE's +0.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -20.0% ROA vs AQST's -64.5% |
AQST vs DARE vs AYTU vs PRAX vs LQDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AQST vs DARE vs AYTU vs PRAX vs LQDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRAX leads in 2 of 6 categories
LQDA leads 1 • AYTU leads 1 • AQST leads 0 • DARE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LQDA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LQDA and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $69M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. AYTU is the more profitable business, keeping -39.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DARE's -414.3%. On growth, LQDA holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $45M | -$57,130 | $63M | -$92,000 | $69M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$70M | -$16M | -$4M | -$357M | -$106M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$84M | -$17M | -$24M | -$327M | -$122M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | -$7M | -$698,000 | -$283M | -$108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.3% | -1461.1% | +66.0% | — | +89.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -159.5% | -2396.9% | -13.9% | — | -155.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -188.1% | -414.3% | -39.0% | — | -176.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -119.0% | +492.8% | -1.1% | — | -155.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | -94.6% | -6.5% | — | +11.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.8% | +49.2% | -3.0% | +2.7% | +86.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AYTU leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $516M | $25M | $16M | $9.6B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $527M | $11M | $7M | $9.3B | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.57x | -6.06x | -1.14x | -24.72x | -25.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 17.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.59x | 2587.71x | 0.23x | — | 262.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 0.82x | 8.54x | 43.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.25x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX delivers a -43.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-43 in annual profit, vs $-6 for DARE. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LQDA's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DARE scores 4/9 vs LQDA's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.1% | -172.1% | -43.0% | -5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.5% | -56.8% | -20.0% | -40.2% | -44.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -33.5% | -65.0% | -5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -72.7% | -36.2% | -13.3% | -49.3% | -84.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.21x | 0.00x | 1.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | -$14M | -$8M | -$357M | -$54M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $121M | $16M | $31M | $357M | $176M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $131M | $1M | $23M | $110,000 | $122M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.97x | -35.60x | -7.96x | — | -4.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LQDA five years ago would be worth $159,547 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $215 for AYTU. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs DARE's +0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs DARE's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.4% | +49.2% | -10.8% | +16.4% | +34.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.9% | +0.7% | +104.1% | +775.0% | +172.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.0% | -75.8% | +40.3% | +1976.5% | +456.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.7% | -82.4% | -97.8% | -20.8% | +1495.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | -99.0% | -100.0% | -20.1% | +280.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.4% | -37.6% | +12.0% | +174.9% | +77.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DARE and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DARE is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs DARE's 31.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 0.48x | 1.27x | 1.55x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.55 | $9.19 | $3.07 | $356.00 | $46.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.12 | $1.27 | $1.20 | $35.18 | $11.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.0% | +31.7% | +80.5% | +93.6% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 70.2 | 48.9 | 55.6 | 65.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 581K | 42K | 378K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AQST as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", LQDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 112.8% upside for AQST (target: $9) vs 19.8% for LQDA (target: $51).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | — | — | $544.40 | $50.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | — | — | 16 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PRAX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LQDA leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
AQST vs DARE vs AYTU vs PRAX vs LQDA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AQST or DARE or AYTU or PRAX or LQDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aytu BioPharma, Inc.
(AYTU) is the stronger pick with 1. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. (AQST) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AQST or DARE or AYTU or PRAX or LQDA?
Over the past 5 years, Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) delivered a total return of +1495%, compared to -97.
8% for Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LQDA returned +280. 9% versus AYTU's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AQST or DARE or AYTU or PRAX or LQDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Daré Bioscience, Inc.
(DARE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 223% more volatile than DARE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 158% for Liquidia Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AQST or DARE or AYTU or PRAX or LQDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aytu BioPharma, Inc.
(AYTU) is pulling ahead at 1. 8% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Daré Bioscience, Inc. grew EPS 88. 4% year-over-year, compared to -49. 0% for Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LQDA leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AQST or DARE or AYTU or PRAX or LQDA?
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -414. 3% for Daré Bioscience, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAX leads at 0. 0% versus -2396. 9% for DARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AYTU leads at 69. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AQST or DARE or AYTU or PRAX or LQDA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AQST: 112.
8% to $9. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — AQST or DARE or AYTU or PRAX or LQDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AQST or DARE or AYTU or PRAX or LQDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Daré Bioscience, Inc.
(DARE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48)). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DARE: -99. 0%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AQST and DARE and AYTU and PRAX and LQDA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.