Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs MDGL vs PTCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs MDGL vs PTCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $652M | $6.91B | $9.63B | $12.27B | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $263M | $51M | $-92K | $1.13B | $827M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-81M | $-315M | $-327M | $-309M | $-187M |
| Gross Margin | 99.5% | 33.2% | — | 93.1% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | -44.0% | -7.0% | — | -27.7% | -8.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $82M | $110K | $354M | $492M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $143M | $357M | $357M | $199M | $985M |
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs MDGL vs PTCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) | 100 | 48.7 | -51.3% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 235.1 | +135.1% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Madrigal Pharmaceut… (MDGL) | 100 | 420.3 | +320.3% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 123.6 | +23.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs MDGL vs PTCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARVN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, KYMR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 2.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- +7.7% vs ARVN's +52.8%
MDGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57
- 39.2% 10Y total return vs PTCT's 7.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 4.01x
- Beta 0.57, current ratio 4.01x
PTCT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- -6.8% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 432.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs ARVN's +52.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -6.8% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2% |
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs MDGL vs PTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs MDGL vs PTCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARVN leads in 1 of 6 categories
PTCT leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • KYMR leads 0 • MDGL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MDGL and PTCT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDGL and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -22.6% (PTCT) to -6.1% (KYMR). On growth, MDGL holds the edge at +126.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $263M | $51M | -$92,000 | $1.1B | $827M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$111M | -$352M | -$357M | -$312M | -$37M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$81M | -$315M | -$327M | -$309M | -$187M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$276M | -$244M | -$283M | -$272M | -$229M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.5% | +33.2% | — | +93.1% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -44.0% | -7.0% | — | -27.7% | -8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.8% | -6.1% | — | -27.3% | -22.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -105.0% | -4.7% | — | -24.1% | -27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -84.0% | +55.5% | — | +126.8% | -76.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.1% | +13.4% | +2.7% | +2.1% | -100.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ARVN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $652M | $6.9B | $9.6B | $12.3B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $517M | $6.6B | $9.3B | $12.4B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.96x | -22.93x | -24.72x | -41.62x | 8.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 5.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.48x | 176.26x | — | 12.80x | 3.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 4.52x | 8.54x | 19.91x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 7.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PTCT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARVN delivers a -14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-50 for MDGL. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MDGL's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs MDGL's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.3% | -25.0% | -43.0% | -50.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.3% | -22.3% | -40.2% | -25.4% | -6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.4% | -24.9% | -65.0% | -29.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.0% | -27.2% | -49.3% | -32.9% | +55.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.05x | 0.00x | 0.59x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$134M | -$275M | -$357M | $156M | -$492M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $143M | $357M | $357M | $199M | $985M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $82M | $110,000 | $354M | $492M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2119.53x | — | -17.51x | -1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDGL five years ago would be worth $41,011 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,601 for ARVN. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs ARVN's +52.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs ARVN's -25.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | +16.3% | +16.4% | -9.9% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.8% | +190.7% | +775.0% | +79.0% | +58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.7% | +205.1% | +1976.5% | +73.2% | +16.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.0% | +92.1% | -20.8% | +310.1% | +60.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | +154.4% | -20.1% | +3921.5% | +733.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.5% | +45.0% | +174.9% | +20.1% | +5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRAX and MDGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ARVN's 70.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.15x | 1.55x | 0.57x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.51 | $103.00 | $356.00 | $615.00 | $87.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.90 | $28.06 | $35.18 | $265.00 | $37.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.2% | +82.2% | +93.6% | +87.0% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 54.1 | 55.6 | 61.2 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 808K | 602K | 378K | 310K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARVN as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", MDGL as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 27.6% for ARVN (target: $13).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $117.06 | $544.40 | $705.67 | $89.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 26 | 16 | 23 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +14.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARVN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PTCT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs MDGL vs PTCT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or MDGL or PTCT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger pick with 432. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or MDGL or PTCT?
Over the past 5 years, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) delivered a total return of +310. 1%, compared to -84. 0% for Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDGL returned +39. 2% versus ARVN's -36. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or MDGL or PTCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 173% more volatile than MDGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 59% for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or MDGL or PTCT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is pulling ahead at 432. 1% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or MDGL or PTCT?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or MDGL or PTCT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or MDGL or PTCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57)). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDGL: +39. 2%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ARVN and KYMR and PRAX and MDGL and PTCT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDGL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.