Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.72B | $11.87B | $10.13B | $25.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.46B | $4.99B | $4.23B | $12.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $475M | $982M | $824M | $2.21B |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | 67.3% | 62.2% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 23.5% | 25.7% | 26.4% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 11.4x | 11.6x | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.17B | $4.57B | $4.48B | $18.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $575M | $961M | $468M | $1.78B |
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) | 100 | 203.2 | +103.2% |
| First Horizon Corpo… (FHN) | 100 | 261.7 | +161.7% |
| Wintrust Financial … (WTFC) | 100 | 356.9 | +256.9% |
| Huntington Bancshar… (HBAN) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.8%, EPS growth 284.7%
- 16.8% NII/revenue growth vs FHN's 1.0%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.1x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FHN's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
FHN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 50.0%, current ratio 0.96x
- +34.9% vs HBAN's +12.4%
WTFC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 224.8% 10Y total return vs FHN's 119.6%
- PEG 0.59 vs ASB's 1.17
- NIM 3.1% vs ASB's 2.7%
HBAN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 3.7%
- Beta 1.09, yield 3.7%, current ratio 0.19x
- Beta 1.09 vs ASB's 1.26, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.8% NII/revenue growth vs FHN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FHN's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs ASB's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs HBAN's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.9% vs HBAN's +12.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FHN's 0.4% |
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ASB leads in 1 of 6 categories
FHN leads 1 • WTFC leads 1 • HBAN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ASB and FHN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.5B annually — 5.1x ASB's $2.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.7% (FHN) to 17.7% (HBAN).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $5.0B | $4.2B | $12.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $653M | $1.3B | $1.2B | $3.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $475M | $982M | $824M | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $579M | $628M | $915M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.3% | +67.3% | +62.2% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +25.7% | +26.4% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +19.7% | +19.5% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +12.6% | +21.5% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +176.9% | +79.3% | +25.5% | -11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ASB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, ASB trades at a 21% valuation discount to WTFC's 13.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WTFC offers better value at 0.66x vs ASB's 1.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $11.9B | $10.1B | $25.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $15.5B | $14.1B | $42.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.28x | 13.02x | 13.08x | 11.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.69x | 11.41x | 11.62x | 11.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.24x | — | 0.66x | 0.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.40x | 11.58x | 11.71x | 15.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.92x | 2.38x | 2.39x | 2.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.33x | 1.41x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.08x | 18.90x | 11.12x | 11.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FHN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTFC delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $10 for ASB. FHN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASB's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASB scores 7/9 vs HBAN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +10.7% | +11.3% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.2% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +7.0% | +7.5% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +10.2% | +6.4% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | 0.50x | 0.62x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $3.6B | $4.0B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $575M | $961M | $468M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.2B | $4.6B | $4.5B | $18.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.60x | 0.82x | 0.74x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTFC five years ago would be worth $20,287 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,203 for HBAN. Over the past 12 months, FHN leads with a +34.9% total return vs HBAN's +12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTFC at 35.3% vs HBAN's 22.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.4% | +2.1% | +6.4% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.9% | +34.9% | +34.0% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.2% | +145.7% | +147.6% | +85.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.7% | +43.6% | +102.9% | +22.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.5% | +119.6% | +224.8% | +121.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.1% | +34.9% | +35.3% | +22.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASB and HBAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HBAN is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASB's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASB currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs HBAN's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.10x | 1.16x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.52 | $26.56 | $162.96 | $19.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.40 | $18.58 | $113.75 | $14.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +92.1% | +92.8% | +83.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.8 | 62.0 | 63.5 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 5.0M | 438K | 24.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ASB and HBAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASB as "Hold", FHN as "Hold", WTFC as "Buy", HBAN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.9% upside for HBAN (target: $20) vs 4.5% for ASB (target: $30). For income investors, HBAN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs FHN's 2.59%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.75 | $28.00 | $174.57 | $20.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 35 | 22 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +2.6% | — | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 3 | 13 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.93 | $0.63 | — | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +7.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ASB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FHN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) is the stronger pick with 16.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN). Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN?
On trailing P/E, Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus Wintrust Financial Corporation at 13. 1x. On forward P/E, Associated Banc-Corp is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Wintrust Financial Corporation wins at 0. 59x versus Associated Banc-Corp's 1. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN?
Over the past 5 years, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) delivered a total return of +102.
9%, compared to +22. 0% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTFC returned +224. 8% versus ASB's +103. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
09β versus Associated Banc-Corp's 1. 26β — meaning ASB is approximately 16% more volatile than HBAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 84% for Associated Banc-Corp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) is pulling ahead at 16.
8% versus 1. 0% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Associated Banc-Corp grew EPS 284. 7% year-over-year, compared to 12. 1% for Wintrust Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN?
First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 17. 7% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTFC leads at 26. 4% versus 21. 5% for HBAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FHN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 59x versus Associated Banc-Corp's 1. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for Wintrust Financial Corporation — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBAN: 25. 9% to $20. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN?
In this comparison, HBAN (3.
7% yield), ASB (3. 3% yield), FHN (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. WTFC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09), 3. 7% yield, +121. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HBAN: +121. 5%, WTFC: +224. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASB and FHN and WTFC and HBAN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ASB is a small-cap high-growth stock; FHN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WTFC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HBAN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ASB, FHN, HBAN pay a dividend while WTFC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.