Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $770M | $620.85B | $364.18B | $4.38B | $140.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $310M | $323.90B | $184.43B | $1.04B | $58.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $28.84B | $12.30B | $502M | $7.32B |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 21.7% | 30.4% | 51.8% | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.8% | 10.5% | 9.0% | 38.8% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.5x | 14.8x | 15.0x | 8.6x | 13.3x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $43.54B | $46.74B | $619M | $23.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $10.68B | $6.47B | $752M | $6.50B |
ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ardmore Shipping Co… (ASC) | 100 | 322.9 | +222.9% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 322.2 | +222.2% |
| Chevron Corporation (CVX) | 100 | 199.0 | +99.0% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 477.4 | +377.4% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 100 | 272.4 | +172.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 155.3% 10Y total return vs COP's 233.4%
- Lower P/E (6.5x vs 8.6x)
XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
CVX is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%
STNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- 48.4% margin vs CVX's 6.7%
- +115.3% vs COP's +34.7%
- 12.6% ROA vs CVX's 4.2%, ROIC 7.2% vs 6.2%
COP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.08, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.08, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.30x
- 7.5% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
- Beta 0.08 vs ASC's 0.48
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 8.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.4% margin vs CVX's 6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs ASC's 0.48 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.3% vs COP's +34.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs CVX's 4.2%, ROIC 7.2% vs 6.2% |
ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STNG leads in 3 of 6 categories
ASC leads 0 • XOM leads 0 • CVX leads 0 • COP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 1044.2x ASC's $310M. STNG is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVX's 6.7%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $310M | $323.9B | $184.4B | $1.0B | $58.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $101M | $59.9B | $37.1B | $580M | $22.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $28.8B | $12.3B | $502M | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | $23.6B | $16.2B | $389M | $18.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +21.7% | +30.4% | +51.8% | +29.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +10.5% | +9.0% | +38.8% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +8.9% | +6.7% | +48.4% | +12.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | +7.3% | +8.8% | +37.5% | +31.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | -1.3% | -5.3% | +46.2% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.7% | -11.0% | -24.5% | +2.5% | -20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ASC and COP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, STNG trades at a 56% valuation discount to CVX's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, COP's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $770M | $620.8B | $364.2B | $4.4B | $140.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $852M | $653.7B | $404.5B | $4.3B | $157.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.43x | 21.86x | 27.53x | 12.05x | 18.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.51x | 14.79x | 15.02x | 8.58x | 13.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.41x | 10.91x | 10.89x | 8.68x | 6.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.48x | 1.92x | 1.97x | 4.67x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 2.37x | 1.76x | 1.30x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.29x | 21.95x | 8.92x | 8.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for ASC. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COP's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STNG scores 6/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +10.7% | +7.2% | +15.9% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +6.4% | +4.2% | +12.6% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +8.6% | +6.2% | +7.2% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +8.9% | +6.6% | +8.4% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.16x | 0.24x | 0.19x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $82M | $32.9B | $40.3B | -$133M | $16.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $10.7B | $6.5B | $752M | $6.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $43.5B | $46.7B | $619M | $23.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.70x | 69.44x | 17.22x | 6.82x | 9.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASC five years ago would be worth $48,818 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,396 for CVX. Over the past 12 months, STNG leads with a +115.3% total return vs COP's +34.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STNG at 24.4% vs COP's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +81.3% | +20.3% | +18.2% | +71.3% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.0% | +43.9% | +39.5% | +115.3% | +34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.2% | +44.9% | +26.7% | +92.7% | +23.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +388.2% | +164.6% | +94.0% | +359.0% | +131.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.3% | +105.0% | +135.8% | +62.8% | +233.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.8% | +13.2% | +8.2% | +24.4% | +7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XOM and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASC's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STNG currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | -0.15x | -0.05x | 0.28x | 0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.61 | $176.41 | $214.71 | $87.39 | $135.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.18 | $101.19 | $133.77 | $37.96 | $84.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +83.0% | +85.0% | +96.9% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.8 | 42.4 | 42.1 | 60.5 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 677K | 18.9M | 11.0M | 1.2M | 9.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASC as "Buy", XOM as "Hold", CVX as "Buy", STNG as "Buy", COP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for COP (target: $127) vs 0.7% for ASC (target: $19). For income investors, CVX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.76% vs STNG's 1.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $160.43 | $190.93 | $85.33 | $127.07 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 55 | 53 | 31 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.7% | +3.8% | +2.0% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 26 | 8 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $4.00 | $6.87 | $1.69 | $3.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% | +3.3% | +0.0% | +3.6% |
STNG leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ConocoPhillips (COP) is the stronger pick with 7.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?
On trailing P/E, Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus Chevron Corporation at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, Ardmore Shipping Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?
Over the past 5 years, Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) delivered a total return of +388.
2%, compared to +94. 0% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +233. 4% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Ardmore Shipping Corporation's 0. 48β — meaning ASC is approximately -428% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 36% for ConocoPhillips — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ConocoPhillips (COP) is pulling ahead at 7.
5% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -71. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 6. 7% for Chevron Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STNG leads at 33. 0% versus 9. 0% for CVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) trades at 6.
5x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Chevron Corporation — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COP: 10. 6% to $127. 07.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Chevron Corporation (CVX) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, ASC: +155. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASC and XOM and CVX and STNG and COP?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASC (Industrials) and XOM (Energy) and CVX (Energy) and STNG (Energy) and COP (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; COP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.