Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BM
Market Cap$770M
5Y Perf.+222.9%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$620.85B
5Y Perf.+222.2%
CVX
Chevron Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$364.18B
5Y Perf.+99.0%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • MC
Market Cap$4.38B
5Y Perf.+377.4%
COP
ConocoPhillips

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$140.02B
5Y Perf.+172.4%

ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ASC logoASC
XOM logoXOM
CVX logoCVX
STNG logoSTNG
COP logoCOP
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas IntegratedOil & Gas IntegratedOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$770M$620.85B$364.18B$4.38B$140.02B
Revenue (TTM)$310M$323.90B$184.43B$1.04B$58.31B
Net Income (TTM)$41M$28.84B$12.30B$502M$7.32B
Gross Margin28.8%21.7%30.4%51.8%29.2%
Operating Margin20.8%10.5%9.0%38.8%18.3%
Forward P/E6.5x14.8x15.0x8.6x13.3x
Total Debt$129M$43.54B$46.74B$619M$23.44B
Cash & Equiv.$47M$10.68B$6.47B$752M$6.50B

ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ASC
XOM
CVX
STNG
COP
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ardmore Shipping Co… (ASC)100322.9+222.9%
Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM)100322.2+222.2%
Chevron Corporation (CVX)100199.0+99.0%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)100477.4+377.4%
ConocoPhillips (COP)100272.4+172.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: STNG leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. ConocoPhillips is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. ASC and CVX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

ASC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 155.3% 10Y total return vs COP's 233.4%
  • Lower P/E (6.5x vs 8.6x)
Best for: long-term compounding
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Growth Play

XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
Best for: growth exposure
CVX
Chevron Corporation
The Income Pick

CVX is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%
Best for: dividends
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Defensive Pick

STNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
  • 48.4% margin vs CVX's 6.7%
  • +115.3% vs COP's +34.7%
  • 12.6% ROA vs CVX's 4.2%, ROIC 7.2% vs 6.2%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
COP
ConocoPhillips
The Income Pick

COP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.08, yield 2.8%
  • Beta 0.08, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.30x
  • 7.5% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
  • Beta 0.08 vs ASC's 0.48
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOP logoCOP7.5% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
ValueASC logoASCLower P/E (6.5x vs 8.6x)
Quality / MarginsSTNG logoSTNG48.4% margin vs CVX's 6.7%
Stability / SafetyCOP logoCOPBeta 0.08 vs ASC's 0.48
DividendsCVX logoCVX3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%
Momentum (1Y)STNG logoSTNG+115.3% vs COP's +34.7%
Efficiency (ROA)STNG logoSTNG12.6% ROA vs CVX's 4.2%, ROIC 7.2% vs 6.2%

ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ASCArdmore Shipping Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

XOMExxon Mobil Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Products
68.7%$217.8B
Upstream
17.6%$55.7B
Chemical Products
6.0%$18.9B
Specialty Products
5.4%$17.3B
Income From Equity Affiliates
1.7%$5.3B
Other Revenue
0.6%$2.1B
CVXChevron Corporation
FY 2025
Downstream
61.1%$72.5B
Upstream
38.4%$45.5B
All Other Segments
0.5%$644M
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

COPConocoPhillips
FY 2025
Crude oil product line
75.7%$39.1B
Natural Gas Product Line
17.1%$8.9B
Natural Gas Liquids
7.2%$3.7B

ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSTNGLAGGINGCOP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

STNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 1044.2x ASC's $310M. STNG is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVX's 6.7%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
RevenueTrailing 12 months$310M$323.9B$184.4B$1.0B$58.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$101M$59.9B$37.1B$580M$22.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$41M$28.8B$12.3B$502M$7.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$41M$23.6B$16.2B$389M$18.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.8%+21.7%+30.4%+51.8%+29.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.8%+10.5%+9.0%+38.8%+18.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.2%+8.9%+6.7%+48.4%+12.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-13.2%+7.3%+8.8%+37.5%+31.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.1%-1.3%-5.3%+46.2%-2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+91.7%-11.0%-24.5%+2.5%-20.2%
STNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ASC and COP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.0x trailing earnings, STNG trades at a 56% valuation discount to CVX's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, COP's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
Market CapShares × price$770M$620.8B$364.2B$4.4B$140.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$852M$653.7B$404.5B$4.3B$157.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.43x21.86x27.53x12.05x18.09x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.51x14.79x15.02x8.58x13.29x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.41x10.91x10.89x8.68x6.77x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.48x1.92x1.97x4.67x2.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.21x2.37x1.76x1.30x2.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF26.29x21.95x8.92x8.35x
Evenly matched — ASC and COP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

STNG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

STNG delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for ASC. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COP's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STNG scores 6/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.4%+10.7%+7.2%+15.9%+11.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.5%+6.4%+4.2%+12.6%+6.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.0%+8.6%+6.2%+7.2%+10.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.3%+8.9%+6.6%+8.4%+10.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x0.16x0.24x0.19x0.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$82M$32.9B$40.3B-$133M$16.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47M$10.7B$6.5B$752M$6.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$129M$43.5B$46.7B$619M$23.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.70x69.44x17.22x6.82x9.42x
STNG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

STNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ASC five years ago would be worth $48,818 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,396 for CVX. Over the past 12 months, STNG leads with a +115.3% total return vs COP's +34.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STNG at 24.4% vs COP's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+81.3%+20.3%+18.2%+71.3%+19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+97.0%+43.9%+39.5%+115.3%+34.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.2%+44.9%+26.7%+92.7%+23.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+388.2%+164.6%+94.0%+359.0%+131.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.3%+105.0%+135.8%+62.8%+233.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.8%+13.2%+8.2%+24.4%+7.3%
STNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — XOM and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASC's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STNG currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.48x-0.15x-0.05x0.28x0.08x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.61$176.41$214.71$87.39$135.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.18$101.19$133.77$37.96$84.28
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.2%+83.0%+85.0%+96.9%+84.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10074.842.442.160.543.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded677K18.9M11.0M1.2M9.6M
Evenly matched — XOM and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ASC as "Buy", XOM as "Hold", CVX as "Buy", STNG as "Buy", COP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for COP (target: $127) vs 0.7% for ASC (target: $19). For income investors, CVX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.76% vs STNG's 1.99%.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$19.00$160.43$190.93$85.33$127.07
# AnalystsCovering analysts1755533152
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+2.7%+3.8%+2.0%+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises026831
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.38$4.00$6.87$1.69$3.19
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.3%+3.3%+0.0%+3.6%
Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

STNG leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallScorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ASC vs XOM vs CVX vs STNG vs COP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ConocoPhillips (COP) is the stronger pick with 7.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?

On trailing P/E, Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus Chevron Corporation at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, Ardmore Shipping Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?

Over the past 5 years, Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) delivered a total return of +388.

2%, compared to +94. 0% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +233. 4% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus Ardmore Shipping Corporation's 0. 48β — meaning ASC is approximately -428% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 36% for ConocoPhillips — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ConocoPhillips (COP) is pulling ahead at 7.

5% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -71. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?

Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 6. 7% for Chevron Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STNG leads at 33. 0% versus 9. 0% for CVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) trades at 6.

5x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Chevron Corporation — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COP: 10. 6% to $127. 07.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Chevron Corporation (CVX) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).

09

Is ASC or XOM or CVX or STNG or COP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, ASC: +155. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ASC and XOM and CVX and STNG and COP?

These companies operate in different sectors (ASC (Industrials) and XOM (Energy) and CVX (Energy) and STNG (Energy) and COP (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ASC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; COP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ASC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XOM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CVX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STNG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 23%
  • Net Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ASC and XOM and CVX and STNG and COP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ASC: 1.1% · XOM: -1.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(ASC: 13.2% · XOM: 8.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ASC: 21.4x · XOM: 21.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.