Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ATER vs WRBY vs AMZN vs SHOP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ATER
Aterian, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
WRBY
Warby Parker Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.34B
5Y Perf.-48.7%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+65.1%
SHOP
Shopify Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$145.00B
5Y Perf.-17.6%

ATER vs WRBY vs AMZN vs SHOP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ATER logoATER
WRBY logoWRBY
AMZN logoAMZN
SHOP logoSHOP
IndustryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesSpecialty RetailSoftware - Application
Market Cap$12M$3.34B$2.92T$145.00B
Revenue (TTM)$69M$891M$742.78B$12.37B
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$1M$90.80B$1.33B
Gross Margin56.8%53.4%50.6%48.0%
Operating Margin17.2%-0.7%11.5%13.3%
Forward P/E56.7x34.8x60.9x
Total Debt$0.00$233M$152.99B$188M
Cash & Equiv.$5M$286M$86.81B$1.53B

ATER vs WRBY vs AMZN vs SHOPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ATER
WRBY
AMZN
SHOP
StockSep 21May 26Return
Aterian, Inc. (ATER)1000.9-99.1%
Warby Parker Inc. (WRBY)10051.3-48.7%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100165.1+65.1%
Shopify Inc. (SHOP)10082.4-17.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ATER vs WRBY vs AMZN vs SHOP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMZN leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Aterian, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. WRBY and SHOP also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ATER
Aterian, Inc.
The Income Pick

ATER is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 1.46
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.46, current ratio 1.70x
  • Beta 1.46, current ratio 1.70x
  • Beta 1.46 vs SHOP's 2.64
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
WRBY
Warby Parker Inc.
The Momentum Pick

WRBY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +68.3% vs ATER's -35.1%
Best for: momentum
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Value Pick

AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 1.24 vs SHOP's 2.08
  • Lower P/E (34.8x vs 56.7x)
  • 12.2% margin vs ATER's -27.5%
  • 11.5% ROA vs ATER's -46.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs 59.7%
Best for: valuation efficiency
SHOP
Shopify Inc.
The Growth Play

SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 30.1%, EPS growth -39.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
  • 41.2% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
  • 30.1% revenue growth vs ATER's -30.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSHOP logoSHOP30.1% revenue growth vs ATER's -30.4%
ValueAMZN logoAMZNLower P/E (34.8x vs 56.7x)
Quality / MarginsAMZN logoAMZN12.2% margin vs ATER's -27.5%
Stability / SafetyATER logoATERBeta 1.46 vs SHOP's 2.64
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)WRBY logoWRBY+68.3% vs ATER's -35.1%
Efficiency (ROA)AMZN logoAMZN11.5% ROA vs ATER's -46.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs 59.7%

ATER vs WRBY vs AMZN vs SHOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ATERAterian, Inc.
FY 2025
Housewares
21.6%$15M
Heating, Cooling, and Air Quality
20.2%$14M
Essential Oils and Related Accessories
17.6%$12M
Health and Beauty
15.4%$11M
Kitchen Appliances
12.3%$8M
Home Office
9.1%$6M
Cookware, Kitchen Tools, and Gadgets
3.8%$3M
Other (1)
0.0%$14,000
WRBYWarby Parker Inc.
FY 2025
Eyewear Products
92.8%$719M
Services And Other
7.2%$56M
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B
SHOPShopify Inc.
FY 2025
Service
76.2%$8.8B
Subscription and Circulation
23.8%$2.8B

ATER vs WRBY vs AMZN vs SHOP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGSHOP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ATER and AMZN and SHOP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 10768.8x ATER's $69M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATER's -27.5%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricATER logoATERAterian, Inc.WRBY logoWRBYWarby Parker Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.SHOP logoSHOPShopify Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$69M$891M$742.8B$12.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$12M$32M$155.9B$1.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M$1M$90.8B$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$15M$39M-$2.5B$2.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+56.8%+53.4%+50.6%+48.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.2%-0.7%+11.5%+13.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-27.5%+0.2%+12.2%+10.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-21.5%+4.4%-0.3%+17.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-38.5%+8.3%+16.6%+34.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.3%+7.5%+74.8%+15.1%
Evenly matched — ATER and AMZN and SHOP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ATER leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 37.8x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 98% valuation discount to WRBY's 2076.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricATER logoATERAterian, Inc.WRBY logoWRBYWarby Parker Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.SHOP logoSHOPShopify Inc.
Market CapShares × price$12M$3.3B$2.92T$145.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7M$3.3B$2.98T$143.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.51x2076.34x37.82x118.87x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.56.75x34.77x60.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.35x4.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple0.62x73.08x20.47x95.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.18x3.83x4.07x12.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.64x9.25x7.14x10.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF76.32x378.98x72.25x
ATER leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-85 for ATER. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WRBY's 0.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRBY scores 6/9 vs ATER's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricATER logoATERAterian, Inc.WRBY logoWRBYWarby Parker Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.SHOP logoSHOPShopify Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-85.1%+0.4%+23.3%+10.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-46.0%+0.2%+11.5%+9.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+59.7%-1.3%+14.7%+9.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+51.9%-1.0%+15.3%+11.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92666
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.63x0.37x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M-$53M$66.2B-$1.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$286M$86.8B$1.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$233M$153.0B$188M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense13.93x39.96x
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $67 for ATER. Over the past 12 months, WRBY leads with a +68.3% total return vs ATER's -35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs ATER's -48.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricATER logoATERAterian, Inc.WRBY logoWRBYWarby Parker Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.SHOP logoSHOPShopify Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+70.2%+20.2%+19.7%-28.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-35.1%+68.3%+43.7%+18.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.6%+125.0%+156.2%+73.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%-50.1%+64.8%+0.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.0%-50.1%+697.8%+4123.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-48.8%+31.0%+36.8%+20.2%
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ATER and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ATER is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs ATER's 55.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricATER logoATERAterian, Inc.WRBY logoWRBYWarby Parker Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.SHOP logoSHOPShopify Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.46x2.22x1.51x2.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.19$31.00$278.56$182.19
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.52$14.96$185.01$88.14
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.7%+87.7%+97.3%+61.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10076.246.681.134.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.4M2.8M45.5M8.7M
Evenly matched — ATER and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: WRBY as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs 7.8% for WRBY (target: $29).

MetricATER logoATERAterian, Inc.WRBY logoWRBYWarby Parker Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.SHOP logoSHOPShopify Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.33$306.77$164.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts159463
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ATER leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ATER vs WRBY vs AMZN vs SHOP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ATER or WRBY or AMZN or SHOP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Shopify Inc.

(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 4% for Aterian, Inc. (ATER). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Warby Parker Inc. (WRBY) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ATER or WRBY or AMZN or SHOP?

On trailing P/E, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 37. 8x versus Warby Parker Inc. at 2076. 3x. On forward P/E, Amazon. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 34. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ATER or WRBY or AMZN or SHOP?

Over the past 5 years, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -99. 3% for Aterian, Inc. (ATER). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus ATER's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ATER or WRBY or AMZN or SHOP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aterian, Inc.

(ATER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 46β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 80% more volatile than ATER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 63% for Warby Parker Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ATER or WRBY or AMZN or SHOP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.

(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus -30. 4% for Aterian, Inc. (ATER). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warby Parker Inc. grew EPS 107. 7% year-over-year, compared to -42. 3% for Aterian, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ATER or WRBY or AMZN or SHOP?

Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -27. 5% for Aterian, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATER leads at 17. 2% versus -0. 6% for WRBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATER leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ATER or WRBY or AMZN or SHOP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) trades at 34. 8x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 26. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 47. 4% to $164. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ATER or WRBY or AMZN or SHOP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ATER or WRBY or AMZN or SHOP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+697. 8% 10Y return). Warby Parker Inc. (WRBY) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +697. 8%, WRBY: -50. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ATER and WRBY and AMZN and SHOP?

These companies operate in different sectors (ATER (Consumer Cyclical) and WRBY (Healthcare) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and SHOP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ATER is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WRBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ATER

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WRBY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHOP

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ATER and WRBY and AMZN and SHOP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ATER: -38.5% · WRBY: 8.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.