Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ATII vs ACIC vs TPVG vs ACGL vs HCI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Asset Management
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Property & Casualty
ATII vs ACIC vs TPVG vs ACGL vs HCI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Asset Management | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $71M | $509M | $234M | $33.42B | $1.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $335M | $97M | $19.93B | $927M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $107M | $-12M | $4.40B | $303M |
| Gross Margin | — | 63.8% | 83.5% | 37.2% | 66.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.6% | 77.9% | 25.0% | 47.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x | 6.2x | 10.0x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $192K | $152M | $469M | $2.73B | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $199M | $20M | $993M | $1.21B |
ATII vs ACIC vs TPVG vs ACGL vs HCI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archimedes Tech SPA… (ATII) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 95.1 | -4.9% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 103.4 | +3.4% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 104.1 | +4.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATII vs ACIC vs TPVG vs ACGL vs HCI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.05 vs TPVG's 0.77
ACIC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs ACIC's 13.1%
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 10.0x)
- 50.6% margin vs ACGL's 22.1%
- 17.8% yield, vs HCI's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, ACGL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HCI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 434.8% 10Y total return vs ACGL's 321.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.24x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs ACIC's 13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 10.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs ACGL's 22.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs TPVG's 0.77 | |
| Dividends | 17.8% yield, vs HCI's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.4% vs ACIC's -5.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.7% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 6.8% vs 7.2% |
ATII vs ACIC vs TPVG vs ACGL vs HCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ATII vs ACIC vs TPVG vs ACGL vs HCI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories
TPVG leads 1 • ATII leads 0 • ACIC leads 0 • ACGL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL and ATII operate at a comparable scale, with $19.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACGL's 22.1%. On growth, HCI holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $335M | $97M | $19.9B | $927M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $154M | -$22M | $5.2B | $454M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $107M | -$12M | $4.4B | $303M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$693,975 | $71M | -$59M | $6.1B | $282M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +63.8% | +83.5% | +37.2% | +66.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +42.6% | +77.9% | +25.0% | +47.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +31.9% | +50.6% | +22.1% | +32.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +21.1% | -58.7% | +30.7% | +30.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.3% | — | +7.3% | +11.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.3% | -2.3% | +39.0% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HCI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.7x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 41% valuation discount to ACGL's 8.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HCI offers better value at 0.13x vs TPVG's 4.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $71M | $509M | $234M | $33.4B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $71M | $463M | $683M | $35.2B | $836M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -540.00x | 4.90x | 4.73x | 8.07x | 6.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.49x | 6.23x | 10.04x | 8.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.67x | 0.28x | 0.13x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.83x | 9.02x | 6.80x | 1.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.52x | 2.41x | 1.68x | 2.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.65x | 0.66x | 1.46x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.18x | — | 5.45x | 4.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. HCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs ATII's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +35.7% | -3.4% | +19.0% | +30.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +9.0% | -1.5% | +5.9% | +12.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +41.0% | +7.2% | +15.4% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +26.0% | +9.4% | +11.6% | +40.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.48x | 1.33x | 0.11x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $192,033 | -$46M | $449M | $1.7B | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $199M | $20M | $993M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $192,033 | $152M | $469M | $2.7B | $68M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 14.20x | -1.02x | 34.86x | 67.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,750 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,479 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +7.4% total return vs ACIC's -5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 45.6% vs TPVG's -1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.3% | -0.9% | -9.6% | -0.1% | -17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.4% | -5.4% | +7.4% | -0.8% | -0.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | +152.2% | -5.6% | +29.8% | +208.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | +99.0% | -15.2% | +147.5% | +114.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | -24.0% | +91.2% | +321.0% | +434.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.7% | +36.1% | -1.9% | +9.1% | +45.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATII and ACGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATII currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs HCI's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 0.24x | 0.77x | -0.01x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.89 | $13.06 | $7.53 | $103.39 | $210.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.05 | $9.79 | $4.48 | $82.45 | $136.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +80.6% | +76.6% | +90.7% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 39.1 | 67.6 | 45.7 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 178K | 185K | 501K | 1.9M | 167K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TPVG and HCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACIC as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy", HCI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.1% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -82.0% for ACIC (target: $2). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.76% vs HCI's 0.98%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.90 | $8.95 | $104.00 | $126.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 12 | 34 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +17.8% | +0.0% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.02 | $0.02 | $1.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.7% | +0.1% |
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TPVG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ATII vs ACIC vs TPVG vs ACGL vs HCI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATII or ACIC or TPVG or ACGL or HCI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 1% for American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATII or ACIC or TPVG or ACGL or HCI?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. at 8. 1x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HCI Group, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATII or ACIC or TPVG or ACGL or HCI?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +147. 5%, compared to -15. 2% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +434. 8% versus ACIC's -24. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATII or ACIC or TPVG or ACGL or HCI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 77β — meaning TPVG is approximately -6784% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATII or ACIC or TPVG or ACGL or HCI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 13. 1% for American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCI Group, Inc. grew EPS 179. 8% year-over-year, compared to 3. 8% for Arch Capital Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACGL leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATII or ACIC or TPVG or ACGL or HCI?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Archimedes Tech SPAC Partners II Co. Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 0. 0% for ATII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATII or ACIC or TPVG or ACGL or HCI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 10. 0x for Arch Capital Group Ltd. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 55. 1% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATII or ACIC or TPVG or ACGL or HCI?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
8% yield), HCI (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. ATII, ACIC, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATII or ACIC or TPVG or ACGL or HCI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 1. 0% yield, +434. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCI: +434. 8%, ACIC: -24. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATII and ACIC and TPVG and ACGL and HCI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock. TPVG, HCI pay a dividend while ATII, ACIC, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.