Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
AVBH vs HTBK vs BSVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
AVBH vs HTBK vs BSVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $255M | $828M | $400M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $74M | $266M | $137M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $48M | $43M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 72.6% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -34.8% | 25.4% | 41.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 13.3x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $40M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $22M | $245M |
AVBH vs HTBK vs BSVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Commerce C… (HTBK) | 100 | 165.4 | +65.4% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 391.0 | +291.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVBH vs HTBK vs BSVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVBH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 7.8%
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 13.3x), PEG 0.61 vs 2.32
- Beta 0.55 vs HTBK's 1.03
HTBK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 18.2%
- 5.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
- 3.8% yield, vs BSVN's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BSVN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.3%
- 147.0% 10Y total return vs HTBK's 74.6%
- PEG 0.56 vs HTBK's 2.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 13.3x), PEG 0.61 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBH's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs HTBK's 1.03 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs BSVN's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.5% vs BSVN's +10.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBH's 0.7% |
AVBH vs HTBK vs BSVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AVBH vs HTBK vs BSVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 2 of 6 categories
HTBK leads 1 • AVBH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HTBK and BSVN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTBK is the larger business by revenue, generating $266M annually — 3.6x AVBH's $74M. AVBH is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTBK's 18.0%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $74M | $266M | $137M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $71M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $48M | $43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $61M | $36M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +72.6% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.8% | +25.4% | +41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.3% | +18.0% | +31.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +22.8% | +33.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +47.1% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BSVN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 46% valuation discount to HTBK's 17.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.55x vs HTBK's 3.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $255M | $828M | $400M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $269M | $847M | $155M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.41x | 17.24x | 9.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.57x | 13.32x | 9.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | 3.00x | 0.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.89x | 2.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.43x | 3.11x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.17x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.63x | 8.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for HTBK. HTBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVBH's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HTBK scores 8/9 vs AVBH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +6.8% | +18.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.9% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.5% | +6.9% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.1% | +3.1% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.06x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $18M | -$245M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $22M | $245M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $40M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.82x | 0.95x | 1.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $27,366 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,484 for AVBH. Over the past 12 months, HTBK leads with a +47.5% total return vs BSVN's +10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTBK at 28.4% vs AVBH's 10.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.7% | +13.7% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.8% | +47.5% | +10.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.8% | +111.7% | +95.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.8% | +39.5% | +173.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.8% | +74.6% | +147.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.5% | +28.4% | +25.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVBH and HTBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVBH is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HTBK's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HTBK currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs BSVN's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 1.03x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.61 | $13.83 | $50.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.54 | $8.92 | $36.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +97.3% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 56.5 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 82K | 746K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HTBK and BSVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVBH as "Buy", HTBK as "Hold", BSVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.9% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 7.8% for HTBK (target: $15). For income investors, HTBK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs BSVN's 2.31%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $14.50 | $57.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.52 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.3% |
BSVN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HTBK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
AVBH vs HTBK vs BSVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVBH or HTBK or BSVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) is the stronger pick with 5.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVBH or HTBK or BSVN?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Heritage Commerce Corp at 17. 2x. On forward P/E, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 56x versus Heritage Commerce Corp's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVBH or HTBK or BSVN?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +173. 7%, compared to +34. 8% for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSVN returned +147. 0% versus AVBH's +34. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVBH or HTBK or BSVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Heritage Commerce Corp's 1. 03β — meaning HTBK is approximately 89% more volatile than AVBH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 8% for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVBH or HTBK or BSVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) is pulling ahead at 5.
8% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Commerce Corp grew EPS 18. 2% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVBH or HTBK or BSVN?
Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 3% net margin versus 18. 0% for Heritage Commerce Corp — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus -34. 8% for AVBH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTBK leads at 72. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVBH or HTBK or BSVN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 56x versus Heritage Commerce Corp's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for Heritage Commerce Corp — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 34. 9% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVBH or HTBK or BSVN?
In this comparison, HTBK (3.
8% yield), BSVN (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. AVBH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVBH or HTBK or BSVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 3% yield, +147. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSVN: +147. 0%, AVBH: +34. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVBH and HTBK and BSVN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HTBK, BSVN pay a dividend while AVBH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.