Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AVBH vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
AVBH vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $255M | $2.69B | $2.18B | $5.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $74M | $1.41B | $819M | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $243M | $195M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 50.9% | 79.0% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | -34.8% | 20.5% | 29.5% | 36.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 10.8x | 10.3x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $1.82B | $373M | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $657M | $183M | $910M |
AVBH vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 136.0 | +36.0% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 171.7 | +71.7% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 181.6 | +81.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVBH vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVBH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 7.8%
- PEG 0.61 vs WAFD's 3.50
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 10.6x), PEG 0.61 vs 3.49
- Beta 0.55 vs HOMB's 0.81, lower leverage
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.0%
BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.9%, EPS growth 15.6%
- 98.4% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 80.5%
- Beta 0.79, yield 3.0%, current ratio 0.02x
- 3.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HOMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.8% vs AVBH's 1.2%
- 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs AVBH's -3.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBH's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBH's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs AVBH's -3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 10.6x), PEG 0.61 vs 3.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBH's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs HOMB's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.8% vs HOMB's -8.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBH's 0.7% |
AVBH vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AVBH vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BANR leads in 1 of 6 categories
AVBH leads 1 • HOMB leads 1 • WAFD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BANR leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 19.6x AVBH's $74M. AVBH is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAFD's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $74M | $1.4B | $819M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $277M | $253M | $601M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $243M | $195M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $226M | $248M | $354M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +50.9% | +79.0% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.8% | +20.5% | +29.5% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.3% | +16.0% | +23.8% | +27.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +14.8% | +30.3% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +46.3% | +11.2% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AVBH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, AVBH trades at a 30% valuation discount to WAFD's 13.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AVBH offers better value at 0.67x vs WAFD's 4.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $255M | $2.7B | $2.2B | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $269M | $3.8B | $2.4B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.41x | 13.37x | 11.44x | 13.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.57x | 10.77x | 10.32x | 10.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | 4.34x | 0.99x | 4.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.86x | 9.40x | 9.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.43x | 1.91x | 2.67x | 3.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 0.93x | 1.14x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.91x | 8.81x | 12.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. AVBH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs AVBH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +8.0% | +10.3% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.0% | +1.2% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.5% | +3.9% | +7.7% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.1% | +5.7% | +10.1% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.60x | 0.19x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $1.2B | $190M | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $657M | $183M | $910M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $1.8B | $373M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.82x | 0.48x | 1.11x | 1.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AVBH and BANR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVBH five years ago would be worth $13,484 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,117 for HOMB. Over the past 12 months, AVBH leads with a +34.8% total return vs HOMB's -8.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BANR at 18.6% vs AVBH's 10.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.7% | +10.3% | +4.9% | -5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.8% | +21.2% | +1.7% | -8.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.8% | +51.4% | +66.9% | +43.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.8% | +24.2% | +32.5% | +11.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.8% | +80.5% | +98.4% | +54.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.5% | +14.8% | +18.6% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVBH and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVBH is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOMB's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 85.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.79x | 0.79x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.61 | $36.53 | $69.83 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.54 | $26.31 | $57.05 | $25.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +96.3% | +92.4% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 65.0 | 50.7 | 40.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 82K | 655K | 282K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BANR and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVBH as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold", BANR as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.8% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -0.5% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, BANR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.04% vs HOMB's 2.85%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $35.00 | $70.00 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 11 | 13 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.0% | +3.0% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 1 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.05 | $1.96 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.8% | +1.6% | +1.7% |
BANR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). AVBH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
AVBH vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVBH or WAFD or BANR or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH). Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVBH or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus WaFd, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Avidbank Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 61x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVBH or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) delivered a total return of +34. 8%, compared to +11. 2% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANR returned +98. 4% versus AVBH's +34. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVBH or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning HOMB is approximately 48% more volatile than AVBH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVBH or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -3. 8% for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banner Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to 3. 6% for Home Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVBH or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 3% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -34. 8% for AVBH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANR leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVBH or WAFD or BANR or HOMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for WaFd, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 21. 8% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVBH or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
In this comparison, BANR (3.
0% yield), WAFD (3. 0% yield), HOMB (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. AVBH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVBH or WAFD or BANR or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANR: +98. 4%, AVBH: +34. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVBH and WAFD and BANR and HOMB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WAFD, BANR, HOMB pay a dividend while AVBH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.