Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AVBP vs TARS vs NUVL vs PRAX vs ARVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
AVBP vs TARS vs NUVL vs PRAX vs ARVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.22B | $2.72B | $7.53B | $9.63B | $652M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $535M | $0.00 | $-92K | $263M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-166M | $-48M | $-450M | $-327M | $-81M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.4% | — | — | 99.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.5% | — | — | -44.0% |
| Total Debt | $14K | $94M | $0.00 | $110K | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46M | $184M | $262M | $357M | $143M |
AVBP vs TARS vs NUVL vs PRAX vs ARVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArriVent BioPharma,… (AVBP) | 100 | 133.9 | +33.9% |
| Tarsus Pharmaceutic… (TARS) | 100 | 234.8 | +134.8% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 763.9 | +663.9% |
| Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) | 100 | 24.6 | -75.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVBP vs TARS vs NUVL vs PRAX vs ARVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVBP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 12.83x
TARS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.65
- Rev growth 146.7%, EPS growth 48.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 159.5%
- 146.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Beta 0.65 vs PRAX's 1.55
NUVL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- 446.1% 10Y total return vs TARS's 210.8%
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 15.27x
- 3.2% margin vs ARVN's -30.8%
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.7% vs TARS's +35.1%
Among these 5 stocks, ARVN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 146.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs ARVN's -30.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs TARS's +35.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -8.9% ROA vs AVBP's -58.1% |
AVBP vs TARS vs NUVL vs PRAX vs ARVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AVBP vs TARS vs NUVL vs PRAX vs ARVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TARS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARVN leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • AVBP leads 0 • NUVL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TARS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TARS and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $535M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. TARS is the more profitable business, keeping -9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARVN's -30.8%. On growth, TARS holds the edge at +106.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $535M | $0 | -$92,000 | $263M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$133M | -$49M | -$346M | -$357M | -$111M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$166M | -$48M | -$450M | -$327M | -$81M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$161M | -$32M | -$313M | -$283M | -$276M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.4% | — | — | +99.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -9.5% | — | — | -44.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -9.0% | — | — | -30.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -5.9% | — | — | -105.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +106.9% | — | — | -84.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.1% | +75.0% | -17.8% | +2.7% | -65.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ARVN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $2.7B | $7.5B | $9.6B | $652M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $2.6B | $7.3B | $9.3B | $517M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.68x | -40.23x | -17.50x | -24.72x | -7.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.03x | — | — | 2.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.61x | 7.78x | 5.96x | 8.54x | 1.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TARS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TARS delivers a -14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-62 for AVBP. AVBP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TARS's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TARS scores 5/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -62.5% | -14.2% | -42.8% | -43.0% | -14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -58.1% | -8.9% | -37.8% | -40.2% | -9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -23.4% | -32.5% | -65.0% | -22.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -19.6% | -34.4% | -49.3% | -16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.27x | — | 0.00x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$46M | -$90M | -$262M | -$357M | -$134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46M | $184M | $262M | $357M | $143M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14,000 | $94M | $0 | $110,000 | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -18.76x | -26.85x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,601 for ARVN. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs TARS's +35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs ARVN's -25.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.7% | -20.8% | +1.5% | +16.4% | -11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.7% | +35.1% | +53.5% | +775.0% | +52.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.2% | +310.3% | +171.2% | +1976.5% | -58.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | +113.3% | +446.1% | -20.8% | -84.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.2% | +210.8% | +446.1% | -20.1% | -36.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | +60.1% | +39.5% | +174.9% | -25.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TARS and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TARS is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ARVN's 70.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.65x | 1.09x | 1.55x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.14 | $85.25 | $113.02 | $356.00 | $14.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.10 | $38.51 | $63.56 | $35.18 | $5.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +75.0% | +90.6% | +93.6% | +70.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 46.5 | 52.9 | 55.6 | 42.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 509K | 495K | 544K | 378K | 808K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVBP as "Buy", TARS as "Buy", NUVL as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ARVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 27.6% for ARVN (target: $13).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.00 | $89.33 | $144.40 | $544.40 | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 9 | 14 | 16 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +14.1% |
TARS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARVN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AVBP vs TARS vs NUVL vs PRAX vs ARVN: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVBP or TARS or NUVL or PRAX or ARVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is the stronger pick with 146. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate ArriVent BioPharma, Inc. Common Stock (AVBP) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AVBP or TARS or NUVL or PRAX or ARVN?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to -84. 0% for Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +446. 1% versus ARVN's -36. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AVBP or TARS or NUVL or PRAX or ARVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 139% more volatile than TARS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ArriVent BioPharma, Inc. Common Stock (AVBP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 27% for Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AVBP or TARS or NUVL or PRAX or ARVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is pulling ahead at 146. 7% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arvinas, Inc. grew EPS 53. 8% year-over-year, compared to -68. 8% for ArriVent BioPharma, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, TARS leads at 159. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AVBP or TARS or NUVL or PRAX or ARVN?
ArriVent BioPharma, Inc.
Common Stock (AVBP) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -30. 8% for Arvinas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVBP leads at 0. 0% versus -43. 8% for ARVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARVN leads at 98. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AVBP or TARS or NUVL or PRAX or ARVN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AVBP or TARS or NUVL or PRAX or ARVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), +210. 8% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TARS: +210. 8%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AVBP and TARS and NUVL and PRAX and ARVN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AVBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TARS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.