Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AXR vs LXP vs EGP vs ALCO vs FR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
Agricultural Farm Products
REIT - Industrial
AXR vs LXP vs EGP vs ALCO vs FR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | Agricultural Farm Products | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $142M | $3.05B | $10.96B | $316M | $8.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53M | $347M | $737M | $29M | $744M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $94M | $293M | $-142M | $342M |
| Gross Margin | 73.5% | -17.1% | 36.1% | -6.0% | 47.0% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 14.5% | 40.3% | -7.5% | 38.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 742.6x | 36.1x | — | 29.8x |
| Total Debt | $68K | $1.37B | $1.75B | $86M | $2.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $170M | $1M | $38M | $78M |
AXR vs LXP vs EGP vs ALCO vs FR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMREP Corporation (AXR) | 100 | 636.1 | +536.1% |
| LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) | 100 | 106.5 | +6.5% |
| EastGroup Propertie… (EGP) | 100 | 175.4 | +75.4% |
| Alico, Inc. (ALCO) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
| First Industrial Re… (FR) | 100 | 164.8 | +64.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AXR vs LXP vs EGP vs ALCO vs FR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AXR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs EGP's 283.1%
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 29.8x)
- 10.5% ROA vs ALCO's -72.7%, ROIC 10.2% vs -59.5%
LXP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 5.4%
- Beta 0.54, yield 5.4%, current ratio 85.31x
- 5.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FR's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
EGP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- PEG 3.00 vs FR's 7.28
- 13.0% FFO/revenue growth vs ALCO's -5.5%
ALCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 79.2%, current ratio 9.56x
- Beta 0.34 vs AXR's 1.02
- +42.5% vs AXR's +23.8%
FR is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 46.0% margin vs ALCO's -487.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% FFO/revenue growth vs ALCO's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 29.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.0% margin vs ALCO's -487.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs AXR's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FR's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.5% vs AXR's +23.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.5% ROA vs ALCO's -72.7%, ROIC 10.2% vs -59.5% |
AXR vs LXP vs EGP vs ALCO vs FR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AXR vs LXP vs EGP vs ALCO vs FR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AXR leads in 4 of 6 categories
LXP leads 0 • EGP leads 0 • ALCO leads 0 • FR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AXR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FR is the larger business by revenue, generating $744M annually — 25.6x ALCO's $29M. FR is the more profitable business, keeping 46.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALCO's -4.9%. On growth, AXR holds the edge at +93.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $53M | $347M | $737M | $29M | $744M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $241M | $517M | -$41M | $477M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $94M | $293M | -$142M | $342M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $162M | $418M | $19M | $483M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.5% | -17.1% | +36.1% | -6.0% | +47.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +14.5% | +40.3% | -7.5% | +38.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +27.0% | +39.7% | -4.9% | +46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +46.6% | +56.7% | +66.3% | +64.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.8% | -3.3% | +10.2% | -88.8% | +9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | -110.2% | +55.3% | +62.5% | +2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AXR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, AXR trades at a 73% valuation discount to EGP's 41.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EGP offers better value at 3.48x vs FR's 8.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $142M | $3.1B | $11.0B | $316M | $8.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $102M | $4.3B | $12.7B | $364M | $10.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.30x | 28.44x | 41.87x | -2.14x | 33.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.69x | 742.61x | 36.09x | — | 29.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.48x | — | 8.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.32x | 17.29x | 25.20x | — | 21.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.86x | 8.71x | 15.19x | 7.18x | 11.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.11x | 1.48x | 3.11x | 2.92x | 3.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.71x | 18.63x | 27.07x | 21.63x | 72.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AXR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FR delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-136 for ALCO. AXR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FR's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LXP scores 6/9 vs ALCO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +4.6% | +8.4% | -135.6% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.5% | +2.6% | +5.5% | -72.7% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +1.1% | +4.3% | -59.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +1.4% | +5.6% | -68.0% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.67x | 0.50x | 0.79x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$40M | $1.2B | $1.8B | -$35M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $170M | $1M | $38M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $68,000 | $1.4B | $1.8B | $86M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.00x | 8.68x | -57.14x | 4.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AXR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXR five years ago would be worth $24,126 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,203 for LXP. Over the past 12 months, ALCO leads with a +42.5% total return vs AXR's +23.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXR at 23.9% vs LXP's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.1% | +5.8% | +14.2% | +12.7% | +8.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.8% | +36.6% | +27.1% | +42.5% | +32.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.3% | +23.5% | +28.7% | +82.3% | +24.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.3% | +2.0% | +46.8% | +45.6% | +41.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +504.5% | +70.8% | +283.1% | +66.6% | +201.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.9% | +7.3% | +8.8% | +22.1% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EGP and ALCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AXR's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EGP currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs ALCO's 92.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 0.54x | 0.52x | 0.34x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.00 | $52.79 | $204.19 | $44.86 | $64.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.61 | $38.20 | $159.37 | $28.90 | $47.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +98.0% | +99.9% | +92.1% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.0 | 61.6 | 62.1 | 44.6 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 532K | 337K | 29K | 913K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LXP and FR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AXR as "Buy", LXP as "Buy", EGP as "Hold", ALCO as "Buy", FR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for ALCO (target: $45) vs -1.5% for LXP (target: $51). For income investors, LXP offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs ALCO's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $51.00 | $204.73 | $45.00 | $65.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 15 | 33 | 3 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.4% | +2.8% | +0.5% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.80 | $5.67 | $0.20 | $1.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
AXR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
AXR vs LXP vs EGP vs ALCO vs FR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AXR or LXP or EGP or ALCO or FR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Alico, Inc. (ALCO). AMREP Corporation (AXR) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMREP Corporation (AXR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AXR or LXP or EGP or ALCO or FR?
On trailing P/E, AMREP Corporation (AXR) is the cheapest at 11.
3x versus EastGroup Properties, Inc. at 41. 9x. On forward P/E, AMREP Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: EastGroup Properties, Inc. wins at 3. 00x versus First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. 's 7. 28x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AXR or LXP or EGP or ALCO or FR?
Over the past 5 years, AMREP Corporation (AXR) delivered a total return of +141.
3%, compared to +2. 0% for LXP Industrial Trust (LXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXR returned +504. 5% versus ALCO's +66. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AXR or LXP or EGP or ALCO or FR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alico, Inc.
(ALCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus AMREP Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning AXR is approximately 199% more volatile than ALCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMREP Corporation (AXR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 93% for First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AXR or LXP or EGP or ALCO or FR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -5. 5% for Alico, Inc. (ALCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LXP Industrial Trust grew EPS 180. 0% year-over-year, compared to -22. 2% for Alico, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EGP leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AXR or LXP or EGP or ALCO or FR?
EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 7% net margin versus -334. 3% for Alico, Inc. — meaning it keeps 35. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FR leads at 42. 3% versus -450. 5% for ALCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXR leads at 66. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AXR or LXP or EGP or ALCO or FR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 00x versus First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. 's 7. 28x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AMREP Corporation (AXR) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 742. 6x for LXP Industrial Trust — 729. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALCO: 9. 0% to $45. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AXR or LXP or EGP or ALCO or FR?
In this comparison, LXP (5.
4% yield), FR (2. 8% yield), EGP (2. 8% yield), ALCO (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. AXR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AXR or LXP or EGP or ALCO or FR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 2. 8% yield, +283. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGP: +283. 1%, AXR: +504. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AXR and LXP and EGP and ALCO and FR?
These companies operate in different sectors (AXR (Real Estate) and LXP (Real Estate) and EGP (Real Estate) and ALCO (Consumer Defensive) and FR (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AXR is a small-cap deep-value stock; LXP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LXP, EGP, FR pay a dividend while AXR, ALCO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.