Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BAOS vs BIDU vs BABA vs IQ vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Specialty Retail
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
BAOS vs BIDU vs BABA vs IQ vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Retail | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $4M | $48.92B | $340.44B | $1.18B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $359K | $130.46B | $1.01T | $27.11B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $9.00B | $123.35B | $-390M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | -89.3% | 44.7% | 41.2% | 21.9% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -91.5% | -2.6% | 10.9% | 1.7% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.6x | 4.1x | 4.8x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $685K | $79.32B | $248.49B | $14.19B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $24.83B | $181.73B | $3.53B | $30.71B |
BAOS vs BIDU vs BABA vs IQ vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baosheng Media Grou… (BAOS) | 100 | 8.0 | -92.0% |
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 49.3 | -50.7% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 59.3 | -40.7% |
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 393.7 | +293.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAOS vs BIDU vs BABA vs IQ vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAOS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BIDU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.04 vs GOOGL's 0.99
- Lower P/E (2.6x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.04 vs 0.99
BABA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 1.3%
- Beta 1.21, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 1.21 vs BAOS's 1.73
- 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, IQ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs BABA's 83.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs BAOS's -32.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs BAOS's -32.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.6x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.04 vs 0.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs BAOS's -91.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs BAOS's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs IQ's -36.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs BAOS's -163.4%, ROIC 25.1% vs -72.5% |
BAOS vs BIDU vs BABA vs IQ vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BAOS vs BIDU vs BABA vs IQ vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories
IQ leads 1 • BAOS leads 0 • BIDU leads 0 • BABA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 2822869.0x BAOS's $358,520. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BAOS's -91.7%. On growth, BAOS holds the edge at +5.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $358,520 | $130.5B | $1.01T | $27.1B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | $4.9B | $114.6B | $6.3B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | $9.0B | $123.4B | -$390M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$15.7B | $2.6B | $466M | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -89.3% | +44.7% | +41.2% | +21.9% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -91.5% | -2.6% | +10.9% | +1.7% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -91.7% | +6.9% | +12.2% | -1.4% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -12.0% | +0.3% | +1.7% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | -7.1% | +4.8% | -7.8% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -140.7% | -2.6% | -52.0% | -2.1% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
IQ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.7x trailing earnings, IQ trades at a 71% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIDU offers better value at 0.24x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $48.9B | $340.4B | $1.2B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $56.9B | $350.3B | $2.7B | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | 14.44x | 17.90x | 10.69x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.58x | 4.13x | 4.83x | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.24x | — | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.79x | 13.55x | 10.27x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.81x | 2.50x | 2.33x | 0.27x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 1.17x | 2.12x | 0.60x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.41x | 29.64x | 4.13x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-3 for BAOS. BAOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQ's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs BAOS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | +3.1% | +11.2% | -2.9% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -163.4% | +2.0% | +6.7% | -0.9% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -72.5% | +4.8% | +9.6% | +5.8% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -93.5% | +6.3% | +10.4% | +7.8% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.28x | 0.23x | 1.06x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$795,531 | $54.5B | $66.8B | $10.7B | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $24.8B | $181.7B | $3.5B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $684,997 | $79.3B | $248.5B | $14.2B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -180.82x | 9.71x | 15.74x | 0.77x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $881 for IQ. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs IQ's -36.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs IQ's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | -6.9% | -9.5% | -40.4% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.0% | +61.3% | +16.0% | -36.0% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.0% | +14.2% | +74.8% | -79.6% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.1% | -27.0% | -35.4% | -91.2% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -17.5% | +83.4% | -92.2% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.5% | +4.5% | +20.5% | -41.1% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BABA and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BABA is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAOS's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs BAOS's 33.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 1.41x | 1.21x | 1.43x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.30 | $165.30 | $192.67 | $2.84 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.91 | $81.17 | $103.71 | $1.07 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.4% | +84.6% | +73.2% | +42.6% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 69.1 | 61.8 | 45.6 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 2.0M | 10.4M | 11.1M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BIDU and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BIDU as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", IQ as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.5% upside for IQ (target: $2) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, BABA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.27% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $154.70 | $194.23 | $2.16 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 53 | 59 | 22 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.3% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $12.14 | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | +3.8% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BAOS vs BIDU vs BABA vs IQ vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAOS or BIDU or BABA or IQ or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 3% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS). iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) offers the better valuation at 10. 7x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BAOS or BIDU or BABA or IQ or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, iQIYI, Inc.
(IQ) is the cheapest at 10. 7x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Baidu, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Baidu, Inc. wins at 0. 04x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BAOS or BIDU or BABA or IQ or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -91. 2% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus BAOS's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BAOS or BIDU or BABA or IQ or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
21β versus Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited's 1. 73β — meaning BAOS is approximately 43% more volatile than BABA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 106% for iQIYI, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BAOS or BIDU or BABA or IQ or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -32. 3% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alibaba Group Holding Limited grew EPS 70. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1359. 2% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOGL leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BAOS or BIDU or BABA or IQ or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -43. 1% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -42. 9% for BAOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BAOS or BIDU or BABA or IQ or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) trades at 2. 6x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Alphabet Inc. — 27. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IQ: 78. 5% to $2. 16.
08Which pays a better dividend — BAOS or BIDU or BABA or IQ or GOOGL?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
3% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BAOS, BIDU, IQ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BAOS or BIDU or BABA or IQ or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, BAOS: -94. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BAOS and BIDU and BABA and IQ and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (BAOS (Communication Services) and BIDU (Communication Services) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and IQ (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BAOS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; IQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. BABA pays a dividend while BAOS, BIDU, IQ, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.