Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs RCON vs KXIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Education & Training Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Auto - Dealerships
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs RCON vs KXIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Specialty Retail | Education & Training Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $4M | $539M | $760M | $17M | $5M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $359K | $189M | $5.85B | $66M | $95K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $-62M | $-374M | $-43M | $-66M |
| Gross Margin | -89.3% | 52.8% | 67.5% | 23.0% | -20.4% |
| Operating Margin | -91.5% | -33.9% | -9.1% | -86.5% | -303.1% |
| Total Debt | $685K | $12M | $492M | $34M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $77M | $1.32B | $99M | $2M |
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs RCON vs KXIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baosheng Media Grou… (BAOS) | 100 | 8.0 | -92.0% |
| Jumia Technologies … (JMIA) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs RCON vs KXIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAOS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JMIA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.8%, EPS growth 37.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.4%
- -65.8% 10Y total return vs GOTU's -81.2%
- +262.5% vs KXIN's -98.8%
GOTU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 56.0% revenue growth vs KXIN's -100.0%
- -6.4% margin vs KXIN's -694.9%
- -6.8% ROA vs KXIN's -317.8%, ROIC -47.8% vs -36.0%
RCON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.47
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 5.88x
- Beta 0.47 vs JMIA's 2.89, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, KXIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.0% revenue growth vs KXIN's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.4% margin vs KXIN's -694.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs JMIA's 2.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +262.5% vs KXIN's -98.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -6.8% ROA vs KXIN's -317.8%, ROIC -47.8% vs -36.0% |
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs RCON vs KXIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs RCON vs KXIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RCON leads in 2 of 6 categories
GOTU leads 1 • JMIA leads 1 • BAOS leads 0 • KXIN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 61545.8x KXIN's $95,000. GOTU is the more profitable business, keeping -6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KXIN's -694.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $358,520 | $189M | $5.8B | $66M | $95,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | -$56M | -$378M | -$54M | -$24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | -$62M | -$374M | -$43M | -$66M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$53M | $0 | -$44M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -89.3% | +52.8% | +67.5% | +23.0% | -20.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -91.5% | -33.9% | -9.1% | -86.5% | -303.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -91.7% | -32.6% | -6.4% | -64.3% | -694.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -27.8% | +1.7% | -65.9% | -32.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +34.3% | +32.9% | +2.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -140.7% | +46.9% | +66.7% | +35.7% | +88.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — JMIA and GOTU and RCON each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $539M | $760M | $17M | $5M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $474M | $638M | $7M | $4M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | -8.53x | -4.86x | -1.22x | -0.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.81x | 2.85x | 1.12x | 1.72x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 20.70x | 2.67x | 0.11x | 0.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 64.81x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCON leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCON delivers a -9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-6 for KXIN. BAOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JMIA's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAOS scores 4/9 vs KXIN's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | -135.2% | -21.8% | -9.2% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -163.4% | -40.1% | -6.8% | -8.0% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -72.5% | -33.0% | -47.8% | -10.6% | -36.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -93.5% | -97.8% | -39.9% | -11.8% | -44.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.46x | 0.25x | 0.08x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$795,531 | -$65M | -$829M | -$64M | -$1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $77M | $1.3B | $99M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $684,997 | $12M | $492M | $34M | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -180.82x | -8.73x | — | -372.30x | -88.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JMIA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JMIA five years ago would be worth $3,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for KXIN. Over the past 12 months, JMIA leads with a +262.5% total return vs KXIN's -98.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JMIA at 44.1% vs KXIN's -96.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | -32.2% | -19.3% | -45.8% | -95.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.0% | +262.5% | -39.4% | -49.1% | -98.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.0% | +199.0% | -32.3% | -88.7% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.1% | -67.4% | -92.4% | -99.4% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -65.8% | -81.2% | -99.3% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.5% | +44.1% | -12.2% | -51.6% | -96.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JMIA and RCON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCON is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JMIA's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JMIA currently trades 59.1% from its 52-week high vs KXIN's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 2.89x | 0.99x | 0.47x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.30 | $14.72 | $4.56 | $7.16 | $832.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.91 | $2.13 | $1.84 | $0.75 | $4.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.4% | +59.1% | +43.2% | +11.7% | +0.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 54.0 | 52.7 | 42.5 | 33.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 2.0M | 395K | 90K | 38K |
Analyst Outlook
RCON leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JMIA as "Buy", GOTU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.2% upside for JMIA (target: $17) vs 49.2% for GOTU (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.33 | $2.94 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 10 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCON leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). GOTU leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs RCON vs KXIN: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or RCON or KXIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). Analysts rate Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or RCON or KXIN?
Over the past 5 years, Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) delivered a total return of -67.
4%, compared to -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JMIA returned -65. 8% versus KXIN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or RCON or KXIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Jumia Technologies AG's 2. 89β — meaning JMIA is approximately 516% more volatile than RCON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 46% for Jumia Technologies AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or RCON or KXIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kaixin Auto Holdings grew EPS 67. 3% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JMIA leads at -2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or RCON or KXIN?
Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the more profitable company, earning -23. 0% net margin versus -694. 9% for Kaixin Auto Holdings — meaning it keeps -23. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOTU leads at -26. 0% versus -303. 1% for KXIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOTU leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or RCON or KXIN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or RCON or KXIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCON: -99. 3%, KXIN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BAOS and JMIA and GOTU and RCON and KXIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (BAOS (Communication Services) and JMIA (Consumer Cyclical) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and RCON (Energy) and KXIN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BAOS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JMIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KXIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.