Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BCAL vs CVBF vs WAFD vs HAFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BCAL vs CVBF vs WAFD vs HAFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $613M | $2.78B | $2.73B | $908M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $233M | $643M | $1.41B | $445M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $63M | $209M | $243M | $76M |
| Gross Margin | 79.4% | 79.9% | 50.9% | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.8% | 43.8% | 20.5% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 14.2x | 10.9x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $72M | $991M | $1.82B | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $108M | $657M | $213M |
BCAL vs CVBF vs WAFD vs HAFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southern California… (BCAL) | 100 | 217.9 | +117.9% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.4 | +236.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCAL vs CVBF vs WAFD vs HAFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
- 133.6% 10Y total return vs HAFC's 76.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 12.4%, current ratio 0.24x
- PEG 0.36 vs CVBF's 4.48
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 3.0%
WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.81 vs CVBF's 0.94
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4%
HAFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.92, yield 3.6%, current ratio 49.21x
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.76 vs 4.48
- +36.9% vs CVBF's +13.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.76 vs 4.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs CVBF's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.9% vs CVBF's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% |
BCAL vs CVBF vs WAFD vs HAFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BCAL vs CVBF vs WAFD vs HAFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BCAL leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • HAFC leads 1 • WAFD leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 6.1x BCAL's $233M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAFD's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $233M | $643M | $1.4B | $445M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $294M | $277M | $110M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $63M | $209M | $243M | $76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $217M | $226M | $204M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.4% | +79.9% | +50.9% | +57.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +43.8% | +20.5% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | +32.5% | +16.0% | +17.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +33.8% | +14.8% | +45.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +11.1% | +46.3% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BCAL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, BCAL trades at a 27% valuation discount to WAFD's 13.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCAL offers better value at 0.31x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $613M | $2.8B | $2.7B | $908M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $633M | $3.7B | $3.9B | $976M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.88x | 13.49x | 13.56x | 12.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.42x | 14.24x | 10.93x | 9.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.31x | 4.25x | 4.41x | 0.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.19x | 13.02x | 12.98x | 8.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.63x | 4.33x | 1.93x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 1.21x | 0.94x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.77x | 12.81x | 13.09x | 4.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCAL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BCAL delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +9.3% | +8.0% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.4% | +1.0% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +6.8% | +3.9% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +9.3% | +5.7% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.43x | 0.60x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | $883M | $1.2B | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $108M | $657M | $213M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $72M | $991M | $1.8B | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.55x | 2.12x | 0.48x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAFC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAFC five years ago would be worth $16,465 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,217 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, HAFC leads with a +36.9% total return vs CVBF's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 33.4% vs BCAL's 13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.3% | +10.9% | +11.9% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.9% | +13.1% | +28.5% | +36.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.7% | +94.0% | +51.6% | +137.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.7% | +12.2% | +22.5% | +64.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.6% | +67.6% | +84.4% | +76.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.9% | +24.7% | +14.9% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVBF's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs BCAL's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.94x | 0.81x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.47 | $21.48 | $36.12 | $31.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.07 | $17.95 | $26.31 | $21.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +95.5% | +98.8% | +97.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 57.9 | 68.3 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 189K | 1.6M | 661K | 265K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCAL as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", HAFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs BCAL's 0.52%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $24.75 | $35.00 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 16 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +4.0% | +3.0% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $0.82 | $1.05 | $1.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +2.9% | +3.7% | +1.0% |
BCAL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BCAL vs CVBF vs WAFD vs HAFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCAL or CVBF or WAFD or HAFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCAL or CVBF or WAFD or HAFC?
On trailing P/E, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the cheapest at 9.
9x versus WaFd, Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, Hanmi Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Southern California Bancorp wins at 0. 36x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCAL or CVBF or WAFD or HAFC?
Over the past 5 years, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) delivered a total return of +64.
7%, compared to +12. 2% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCAL returned +133. 6% versus CVBF's +67. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCAL or CVBF or WAFD or HAFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning CVBF is approximately 15% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCAL or CVBF or WAFD or HAFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.
2% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCAL or CVBF or WAFD or HAFC?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCAL or CVBF or WAFD or HAFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for CVB Financial Corp. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCAL or CVBF or WAFD or HAFC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 5% for Southern California Bancorp (BCAL).
09Is BCAL or CVBF or WAFD or HAFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAFD: +84. 4%, CVBF: +67. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCAL and CVBF and WAFD and HAFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.