Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Information Technology Services
BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $613M | $88.45B | $50.59B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $233M | $12.64B | $8.22B | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $63M | $3.30B | $1.91B | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 79.4% | 61.9% | 47.9% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 37.8% | 38.7% | 28.4% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 19.5x | 22.6x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $72M | $20.28B | $9.93B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $837M | $814M | $599M |
BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southern California… (BCAL) | 100 | 217.9 | +117.9% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 160.6 | +60.6% |
| Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) | 100 | 225.4 | +125.4% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
- 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
- 27.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- +32.9% vs FIS's -35.3%
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.33, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.33 vs BCAL's 0.90
NDAQ is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 347.6% 10Y total return vs ICE's 225.3%
- 6.4% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 8.1% vs 6.0%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.31 vs ICE's 2.19
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 22.6x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.12
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 22.6x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.12 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs BCAL's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.9% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 8.1% vs 6.0% |
BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NDAQ leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCAL leads 1 • ICE leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BCAL and ICE each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 54.2x BCAL's $233M. BCAL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $233M | $12.6B | $8.2B | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $6.5B | $3.1B | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $63M | $3.3B | $1.9B | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $4.3B | $2.0B | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.4% | +61.9% | +47.9% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +38.7% | +28.4% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | +26.1% | +21.8% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +33.9% | +24.2% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +23.1% | +33.8% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BCAL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, BCAL trades at a 84% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCAL offers better value at 0.31x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $613M | $88.4B | $50.6B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $633M | $107.9B | $59.7B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.88x | 27.06x | 28.80x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.42x | 19.48x | 22.65x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.31x | 3.05x | 2.70x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.19x | 16.71x | 20.14x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.63x | 7.00x | 6.16x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 3.08x | 4.19x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.77x | 20.62x | 25.44x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NDAQ leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NDAQ delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NDAQ's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +11.6% | +15.9% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +2.3% | +6.4% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +7.5% | +8.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +9.5% | +10.2% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.70x | 0.81x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | $19.4B | $9.1B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $837M | $814M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $72M | $20.3B | $9.9B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.55x | 6.53x | 14.11x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NDAQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NDAQ five years ago would be worth $17,036 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BCAL leads with a +32.9% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NDAQ at 18.7% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.3% | -2.1% | -7.6% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.9% | -10.4% | +14.6% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.7% | +50.8% | +67.4% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.7% | +43.4% | +70.4% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.6% | +225.3% | +347.6% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.9% | +14.7% | +18.7% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCAL and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCAL's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BCAL currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.33x | 0.78x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.47 | $189.35 | $101.79 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.07 | $143.17 | $77.09 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +82.5% | +87.4% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 38.8 | 52.6 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 189K | 3.0M | 3.3M | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ICE and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCAL as "Buy", ICE as "Buy", NDAQ as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 15.4% for BCAL (target: $22). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BCAL's 0.52%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $195.71 | $114.60 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 36 | 36 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +1.2% | +1.2% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 | 13 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $1.93 | $1.04 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +1.6% | +1.2% | 0.0% |
NDAQ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BCAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the cheapest at 9.
9x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) delivered a total return of +70. 4%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDAQ returned +347. 6% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Southern California Bancorp's 0. 90β — meaning BCAL is approximately 174% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 81% for Nasdaq, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.
2% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?
Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCAL leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Nasdaq, Inc. — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 0. 5% for Southern California Bancorp (BCAL).
09Is BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, BCAL: +133. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCAL and ICE and NDAQ and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BCAL (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and NDAQ (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NDAQ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.