Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BCAL
Southern California Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$613M
5Y Perf.+117.9%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$88.45B
5Y Perf.+60.6%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50.59B
5Y Perf.+125.4%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.47B
5Y Perf.-66.0%

BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BCAL logoBCAL
ICE logoICE
NDAQ logoNDAQ
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$613M$88.45B$50.59B$24.47B
Revenue (TTM)$233M$12.64B$8.22B$10.89B
Net Income (TTM)$63M$3.30B$1.91B$382M
Gross Margin79.4%61.9%47.9%38.1%
Operating Margin37.8%38.7%28.4%17.5%
Forward P/E11.4x19.5x22.6x7.5x
Total Debt$72M$20.28B$9.93B$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$52M$837M$814M$599M

BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BCAL
ICE
NDAQ
FIS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Southern California… (BCAL)100217.9+117.9%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100160.6+60.6%
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ)100225.4+125.4%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10034.0-66.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BCAL leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. ICE and NDAQ also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BCAL
Southern California Bancorp
The Banking Pick

BCAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
  • 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
  • 27.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
  • +32.9% vs FIS's -35.3%
Best for: growth exposure
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
  • Beta 0.33, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.02x
  • Beta 0.33 vs BCAL's 0.90
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
The Banking Pick

NDAQ is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 347.6% 10Y total return vs ICE's 225.3%
  • 6.4% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 8.1% vs 6.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.31 vs ICE's 2.19
  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 22.6x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.12
  • 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBCAL logoBCAL26.2% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (7.5x vs 22.6x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.12
Quality / MarginsBCAL logoBCAL27.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.33 vs BCAL's 0.90
DividendsFIS logoFIS3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%
Momentum (1Y)BCAL logoBCAL+32.9% vs FIS's -35.3%
Efficiency (ROA)NDAQ logoNDAQ6.4% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 8.1% vs 6.0%

BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BCALSouthern California Bancorp
FY 2025
Deposit Account
100.0%$3M
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M
NDAQNasdaq, Inc.
FY 2025
Market Services
51.4%$4.2B
Capital Access Platforms
26.1%$2.1B
Market Technology
22.6%$1.9B
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNDAQLAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — BCAL and ICE each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 54.2x BCAL's $233M. BCAL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.

MetricBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$233M$12.6B$8.2B$10.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$92M$6.5B$3.1B$3.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$63M$3.3B$1.9B$382M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$57M$4.3B$2.0B$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+79.4%+61.9%+47.9%+38.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+37.8%+38.7%+28.4%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+27.1%+26.1%+21.8%+3.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.4%+33.9%+24.2%+26.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.0%+23.1%+33.8%+92.3%
Evenly matched — BCAL and ICE each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BCAL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, BCAL trades at a 84% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCAL offers better value at 0.31x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$613M$88.4B$50.6B$24.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$633M$107.9B$59.7B$27.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.88x27.06x28.80x63.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.42x19.48x22.65x7.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.31x3.05x2.70x2.58x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.19x16.71x20.14x7.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.63x7.00x6.16x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.08x3.08x4.19x1.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.77x20.62x25.44x9.97x
BCAL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NDAQ leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NDAQ delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NDAQ's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.4%+11.6%+15.9%+2.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.6%+2.3%+6.4%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.6%+7.5%+8.1%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.0%+9.5%+10.2%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97996
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.12x0.70x0.81x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$20M$19.4B$9.1B$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$52M$837M$814M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$72M$20.3B$9.9B$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.55x6.53x14.11x4.64x
NDAQ leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NDAQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NDAQ five years ago would be worth $17,036 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BCAL leads with a +32.9% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NDAQ at 18.7% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+3.3%-2.1%-7.6%-27.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+32.9%-10.4%+14.6%-35.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+47.7%+50.8%+67.4%-6.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+42.7%+43.4%+70.4%-63.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+133.6%+225.3%+347.6%-13.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.9%+14.7%+18.7%-2.2%
NDAQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BCAL and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCAL's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BCAL currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x0.33x0.78x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.47$189.35$101.79$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.07$143.17$77.09$43.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.2%+82.5%+87.4%+57.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.038.852.643.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded189K3.0M3.3M5.5M
Evenly matched — BCAL and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ICE and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BCAL as "Buy", ICE as "Buy", NDAQ as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 15.4% for BCAL (target: $22). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BCAL's 0.52%.

MetricBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$22.00$195.71$114.60$67.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts3363637
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+1.2%+1.2%+3.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises114131
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.10$1.93$1.04$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.0%+1.6%+1.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — ICE and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NDAQ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BCAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallNasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BCAL vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the cheapest at 9.

9x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Nasdaq, Inc.

(NDAQ) delivered a total return of +70. 4%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDAQ returned +347. 6% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Southern California Bancorp's 0. 90β — meaning BCAL is approximately 174% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 81% for Nasdaq, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.

2% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?

Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCAL leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Nasdaq, Inc. — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 0. 5% for Southern California Bancorp (BCAL).

09

Is BCAL or ICE or NDAQ or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, BCAL: +133. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BCAL and ICE and NDAQ and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (BCAL (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and NDAQ (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NDAQ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BCAL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NDAQ

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BCAL and ICE and NDAQ and FIS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BCAL: 26.2% · ICE: 7.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(BCAL: 27.1% · ICE: 26.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BCAL: 9.9x · ICE: 27.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.