Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BCO vs BAC vs WFC vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
BCO vs BAC vs WFC vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $4.42B | $390.51B | $233.93B | $814.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.39B | $188.75B | $125.40B | $270.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $180M | $30.63B | $21.06B | $58.03B |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 55.4% | 62.2% | 58.6% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 18.5% | 18.6% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 11.5x | 10.8x | 13.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.93B | $365.90B | $281.88B | $751.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.27B | $231.84B | $203.36B | $469.32B |
BCO vs BAC vs WFC vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Brink's Company (BCO) | 100 | 267.4 | +167.4% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 212.7 | +112.7% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | 100 | 285.8 | +185.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 310.5 | +210.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCO vs BAC vs WFC vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs WFC's 1.93
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 13.6x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.04
- 2.5% ROA vs BAC's 0.9%, ROIC 14.2% vs 3.2%
BAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 2.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, current ratio 0.42x
- Beta 0.98, yield 2.5%, current ratio 0.42x
- 2.5% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7%
WFC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 2.5% vs BAC's 1.8%
- Beta 0.98 vs BCO's 1.12, lower leverage
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 21.7%
- 454.6% 10Y total return vs BAC's 319.9%
- 14.6% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -1.9%
- 21.6% margin vs BCO's 3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 13.6x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.04 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs BCO's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.98 vs BCO's 1.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.0% vs WFC's +6.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs BAC's 0.9%, ROIC 14.2% vs 3.2% |
BCO vs BAC vs WFC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BCO vs BAC vs WFC vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCO leads 2 • BAC leads 0 • WFC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 50.2x BCO's $5.4B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCO's 3.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $188.8B | $125.4B | $270.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $870M | $36.6B | $31.6B | $81.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $180M | $30.6B | $21.1B | $58.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $544M | $12.6B | -$14.2B | -$119.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +55.4% | +62.2% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +18.5% | +18.6% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +16.2% | +15.7% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +6.7% | +2.4% | -15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.3% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.3% | +18.3% | +16.9% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BCO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 41% valuation discount to BCO's 22.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCO offers better value at 0.38x vs WFC's 2.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $390.5B | $233.9B | $814.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.1B | $524.6B | $312.4B | $1.10T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.81x | 13.43x | 14.09x | 15.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.58x | 11.52x | 10.83x | 13.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.38x | 0.87x | 2.52x | 1.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.05x | 14.33x | 10.10x | 13.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.84x | 2.07x | 1.87x | 3.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.08x | 1.28x | 1.45x | 2.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.12x | 30.96x | 77.08x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BCO delivers a 45.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $10 for BAC. BAC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCO's 12.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +45.6% | +10.1% | +11.5% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +0.9% | +1.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.2% | +3.2% | +3.7% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.9% | +4.2% | +5.0% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 12.10x | 1.21x | 1.56x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.7B | $134.1B | $78.5B | $281.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $231.8B | $203.4B | $469.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.9B | $365.9B | $281.9B | $751.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.75x | 0.44x | 0.60x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,175 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,329 for BAC. Over the past 12 months, BAC leads with a +26.0% total return vs WFC's +6.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.3% vs BCO's 20.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.7% | -7.8% | -19.6% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.1% | +26.0% | +6.2% | +21.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.4% | +96.4% | +109.6% | +131.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.8% | +33.3% | +77.1% | +101.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +291.2% | +319.9% | +83.8% | +454.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.4% | +25.2% | +28.0% | +32.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WFC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCO's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs WFC's 77.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.98x | 0.98x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $136.37 | $57.55 | $97.76 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.10 | $41.25 | $71.90 | $251.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +89.2% | +77.4% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 53.3 | 43.4 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 541K | 35.6M | 15.1M | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BAC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCO as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", WFC as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.0% upside for BCO (target: $163) vs 12.1% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.47% vs BCO's 0.94%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $163.00 | $61.13 | $99.38 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 54 | 60 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +2.5% | +2.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 6 | 3 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $1.27 | $1.48 | $5.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +5.5% | +9.5% | +3.5% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BCO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
BCO vs BAC vs WFC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCO or BAC or WFC or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Brink's Company (BCO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCO or BAC or WFC or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 13.
4x versus The Brink's Company at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, Wells Fargo & Company is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Brink's Company wins at 0. 19x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 1. 93x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCO or BAC or WFC or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +101. 8%, compared to +33. 3% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +454. 6% versus WFC's +83. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCO or BAC or WFC or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
98β versus The Brink's Company's 1. 12β — meaning BCO is approximately 14% more volatile than WFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 121% versus 12% for The Brink's Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCO or BAC or WFC or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -1. 9% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Brink's Company grew EPS 29. 5% year-over-year, compared to 11. 2% for Wells Fargo & Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCO or BAC or WFC or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 3. 8% for The Brink's Company — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 11. 2% for BCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WFC leads at 62. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCO or BAC or WFC or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Brink's Company (BCO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 1. 93x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 6x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCO: 52. 0% to $163. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCO or BAC or WFC or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 9% for The Brink's Company (BCO).
09Is BCO or BAC or WFC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 7% yield, +454. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +454. 6%, WFC: +83. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCO and BAC and WFC and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (BCO (Industrials) and BAC (Financial Services) and WFC (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; WFC is a large-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.