Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BCRX vs KYMR vs PRAX vs IQV vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
BCRX vs KYMR vs PRAX vs IQV vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $1.87B | $6.91B | $9.63B | $30.32B | $8.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $886M | $51M | $-92K | $16.63B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-458M | $-315M | $-327M | $1.39B | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | 18.9% | 33.2% | — | 26.1% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -43.1% | -7.0% | — | 13.9% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | — | — | 14.0x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $477M | $82M | $110K | $16.17B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $90M | $357M | $357M | $1.98B | $214M |
BCRX vs KYMR vs PRAX vs IQV vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BioCryst Pharmaceut… (BCRX) | 100 | 225.7 | +125.7% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 239.2 | +139.2% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 116.1 | +16.1% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 78.0 | -22.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCRX vs KYMR vs PRAX vs IQV vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 94.1%, EPS growth 381.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 47.8%
- 190.8% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 154.4%
- 94.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 16.0x)
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.7% vs BCRX's -11.7%
IQV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- 8.3% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- 4.7% ROA vs BCRX's -97.3%, ROIC 8.7% vs 96.7%
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 94.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs BCRX's -11.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs BCRX's -97.3%, ROIC 8.7% vs 96.7% |
BCRX vs KYMR vs PRAX vs IQV vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BCRX vs KYMR vs PRAX vs IQV vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • BCRX leads 0 • KYMR leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $886M | $51M | -$92,000 | $16.6B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$377M | -$352M | -$357M | $3.5B | $757M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$458M | -$315M | -$327M | $1.4B | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $294M | -$244M | -$283M | $2.7B | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +33.2% | — | +26.1% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -43.1% | -7.0% | — | +13.9% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -51.7% | -6.1% | — | +8.3% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | -4.7% | — | +16.1% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.5% | +55.5% | — | +8.4% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +13.4% | +2.7% | +15.0% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BCRX and IQV and CRL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.4x trailing earnings, BCRX trades at a 68% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BCRX's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRL's 13.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $6.9B | $9.6B | $30.3B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $6.6B | $9.3B | $44.5B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.36x | -22.93x | -24.72x | 22.79x | -62.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 13.96x | 16.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.59x | — | — | 12.97x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.14x | 176.26x | — | 1.86x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.52x | 8.54x | 4.67x | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.71x | — | — | 14.78x | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BCRX and PRAX each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCRX scores 7/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -25.0% | -43.0% | +22.1% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -97.3% | -22.3% | -40.2% | +4.7% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +96.7% | -24.9% | -65.0% | +8.7% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +105.2% | -27.2% | -49.3% | +11.0% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x | 0.00x | 2.44x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $388M | -$275M | -$357M | $14.2B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $90M | $357M | $357M | $2.0B | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $477M | $82M | $110,000 | $16.2B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.66x | -2119.53x | — | 3.10x | 6.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,311 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs BCRX's -11.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.7% | +16.3% | +16.4% | -20.7% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.7% | +190.7% | +775.0% | +16.5% | +32.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.8% | +205.1% | +1976.5% | -5.9% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.2% | +92.1% | -20.8% | -23.8% | -46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +190.8% | +154.4% | -20.1% | +166.5% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.6% | +45.0% | +174.9% | -2.0% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCRX and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.03x | 1.40x | 1.32x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.31 | $103.00 | $356.00 | $247.05 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.00 | $28.06 | $35.18 | $134.65 | $131.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.7% | +82.2% | +93.6% | +72.3% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 54.1 | 55.6 | 58.5 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.4M | 602K | 378K | 1.6M | 806K |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCRX as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 89.4% upside for BCRX (target: $17) vs 13.5% for CRL (target: $206).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.86 | $118.06 | $548.80 | $223.75 | $206.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 26 | 16 | 44 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +4.0% |
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
BCRX vs KYMR vs PRAX vs IQV vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCRX or KYMR or PRAX or IQV or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(BCRX) is the stronger pick with 94. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BCRX) offers the better valuation at 7. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BCRX) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCRX or KYMR or PRAX or IQV or CRL?
On trailing P/E, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(BCRX) is the cheapest at 7. 4x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCRX or KYMR or PRAX or IQV or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -46. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCRX returned +181. 7% versus PRAX's -20. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCRX or KYMR or PRAX or IQV or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(BCRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning CRL is approximately 74% more volatile than BCRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCRX or KYMR or PRAX or IQV or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(BCRX) is pulling ahead at 94. 1% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 381. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BCRX leads at 47. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCRX or KYMR or PRAX or IQV or CRL?
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(BCRX) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCRX leads at 39. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCRX or KYMR or PRAX or IQV or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCRX: 89. 4% to $16. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCRX or KYMR or PRAX or IQV or CRL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BCRX or KYMR or PRAX or IQV or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(BCRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), +181. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCRX: +181. 7%, PRAX: -20. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCRX and KYMR and PRAX and IQV and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.