Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BCRX vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
BCRX vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.87B | $2.57B | $4.55B | $3.86B | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $886M | $669M | $634M | $1.10B | $827M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-458M | $-609M | $-27M | $376M | $-187M |
| Gross Margin | 18.9% | 83.6% | 87.9% | 91.5% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | -43.1% | -83.9% | 5.2% | 7.4% | -8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 32.9x | — | 40.6x | 50.9x | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $477M | $1.28B | $483M | $52M | $492M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $90M | $434M | $214M | $178M | $985M |
BCRX vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BioCryst Pharmaceut… (BCRX) | 100 | 197.8 | +97.8% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 115.9 | +15.9% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 127.2 | +27.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCRX vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCRX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 94.1%, EPS growth 381.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 47.8%
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FOLD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.63
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 2.84x
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 2.84x
- Beta 0.63 vs RARE's 1.42
ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
- 26.2% ROA vs BCRX's -97.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs 96.7%
PTCT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 119.2%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs ACAD's 11.9%
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 50.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs ACAD's 11.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 50.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs RARE's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.9% vs RARE's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs BCRX's -97.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs 96.7% |
BCRX vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BCRX vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
FOLD leads 2 • BCRX leads 1 • RARE leads 0 • PTCT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 1.7x FOLD's $634M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $886M | $669M | $634M | $1.1B | $827M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$377M | -$536M | $40M | $96M | -$37M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$458M | -$609M | -$27M | $376M | -$187M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $294M | -$487M | $30M | $212M | -$229M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +83.6% | +87.9% | +91.5% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -43.1% | -83.9% | +5.2% | +7.4% | -8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -51.7% | -91.0% | -4.3% | +34.3% | -22.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | -72.8% | +4.7% | +19.4% | -27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.5% | -2.4% | +23.7% | +9.7% | -76.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -17.2% | -89.0% | -81.8% | -100.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BCRX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.4x trailing earnings, BCRX trades at a 25% valuation discount to ACAD's 9.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $2.6B | $4.5B | $3.9B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $3.4B | $4.8B | $3.7B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.36x | -4.48x | -164.85x | 9.85x | 8.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.89x | — | 40.62x | 50.91x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.59x | — | 114.88x | 26.91x | 5.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.14x | 3.82x | 7.17x | 3.61x | 3.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 16.29x | 3.15x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.71x | — | 152.43x | 36.74x | 7.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCRX scores 7/9 vs FOLD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.1% | -12.0% | +35.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -97.3% | -45.8% | -3.2% | +26.2% | -6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +96.7% | -89.4% | +5.3% | +10.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +105.2% | -46.4% | +5.1% | +10.1% | +55.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.76x | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $388M | $842M | $269M | -$126M | -$492M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $90M | $434M | $214M | $178M | $985M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $477M | $1.3B | $483M | $52M | $492M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.66x | -14.49x | 1.00x | — | -1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FOLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $16,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +137.9% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FOLD at 6.0% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.7% | +10.7% | +1.5% | -13.7% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.7% | -21.8% | +137.9% | +52.4% | +58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.8% | -44.5% | +19.0% | +4.7% | +16.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.2% | -77.2% | +48.6% | +7.1% | +60.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +190.8% | -59.4% | +119.2% | -22.9% | +733.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.6% | -17.8% | +6.0% | +1.5% | +5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.42x | 0.63x | 1.26x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.31 | $42.37 | $14.50 | $27.81 | $87.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.00 | $18.29 | $5.51 | $14.45 | $37.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.7% | +61.7% | +99.9% | +81.1% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 66.6 | 72.2 | 44.2 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.4M | 1.8M | 3.0M | 1.8M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCRX as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.1% upside for RARE (target: $52) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $51.50 | $14.50 | $34.78 | $89.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 33 | 24 | 37 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOLD leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
BCRX vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCRX or RARE or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BCRX) offers the better valuation at 7. 4x trailing P/E (32. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BCRX) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCRX or RARE or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?
On trailing P/E, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(BCRX) is the cheapest at 7. 4x versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. at 9. 9x. On forward P/E, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 32. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCRX or RARE or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +60. 3%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +733. 2% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCRX or RARE or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 125% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCRX or RARE or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 381. 4% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BCRX leads at 47. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCRX or RARE or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCRX leads at 97. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCRX or RARE or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(BCRX) trades at 32. 9x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 18. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 97. 1% to $51. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCRX or RARE or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BCRX or RARE or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCRX and RARE and FOLD and ACAD and PTCT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.