Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BEKE vs BABA vs JD vs COMP vs PDD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
Specialty Retail
BEKE vs BABA vs JD vs COMP vs PDD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Software - Application | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $62.71B | $341.64B | $47.20B | $5.19B | $151.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $103.52B | $1.01T | $1.30T | $8.31B | $418.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.48B | $123.35B | $32.20B | $14M | $102.27B |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | 41.2% | 12.7% | 10.8% | 56.6% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 10.9% | 1.3% | -4.2% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 3.3x | 4.1x | 1.5x | 56.5x | 1.2x |
| Total Debt | $22.65B | $248.49B | $89.77B | $454M | $10.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11.44B | $181.73B | $108.35B | $199M | $57.77B |
BEKE vs BABA vs JD vs COMP vs PDD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) | 100 | 36.1 | -63.9% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 61.3 | -38.7% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 39.7 | -60.3% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
| PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) | 100 | 76.4 | -23.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BEKE vs BABA vs JD vs COMP vs PDD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BEKE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.9%
- Beta 0.83, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.45x
- Beta 0.83 vs COMP's 1.79, lower leverage
- 1.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
BABA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, JD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
COMP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +19.4% vs PDD's -8.1%
PDD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth 84.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.2%
- 283.2% 10Y total return vs BABA's 84.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 2.21x
- 59.0% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.2x vs 56.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.4% margin vs COMP's 0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs COMP's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.4% vs PDD's -8.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.7% ROA vs COMP's 0.4%, ROIC 40.3% vs -2.5% |
BEKE vs BABA vs JD vs COMP vs PDD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BEKE vs BABA vs JD vs COMP vs PDD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PDD leads in 2 of 6 categories
JD leads 1 • COMP leads 1 • BEKE leads 1 • BABA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PDD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 156.9x COMP's $8.3B. PDD is the more profitable business, keeping 24.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COMP's 0.2%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $103.5B | $1.01T | $1.30T | $8.3B | $418.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.3B | $114.6B | $23.8B | -$100M | $93.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.5B | $123.4B | $32.2B | $14M | $102.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.4B | $2.6B | $9.1B | $16M | $111.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +41.2% | +12.7% | +10.8% | +56.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +10.9% | +1.3% | -4.2% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +12.2% | +2.5% | +0.2% | +24.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +0.3% | +0.7% | +0.2% | +26.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +4.8% | +14.9% | +99.4% | +9.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.7% | -52.0% | -56.3% | +133.3% | +16.5% |
Valuation Metrics
JD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, JD trades at a 79% valuation discount to BEKE's 37.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JD's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BEKE's 91.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $62.7B | $341.6B | $47.2B | $5.2B | $151.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $64.4B | $351.4B | $44.5B | $5.4B | $144.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.13x | 17.99x | 7.78x | -92.40x | 9.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.33x | 4.14x | 1.46x | 56.51x | 1.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.29x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 91.84x | 13.62x | 6.52x | 65.33x | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.57x | 2.34x | 0.28x | 0.75x | 2.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 2.13x | 1.03x | 6.71x | 3.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 50.84x | 29.80x | 7.27x | 25.55x | 8.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PDD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PDD delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $1 for COMP. PDD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COMP's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs COMP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | +11.2% | +10.5% | +1.1% | +26.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +6.7% | +4.6% | +0.4% | +16.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +9.6% | +9.9% | -2.5% | +40.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +10.4% | +10.2% | -2.9% | +42.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.23x | 0.29x | 0.58x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11.2B | $66.8B | -$18.6B | $255M | -$47.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11.4B | $181.7B | $108.3B | $199M | $57.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22.7B | $248.5B | $89.8B | $454M | $10.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 131.87x | 15.74x | 12.85x | -0.12x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COMP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PDD five years ago would be worth $7,598 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,960 for BEKE. Over the past 12 months, COMP leads with a +19.4% total return vs PDD's -8.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 51.8% vs JD's -2.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.4% | -9.2% | +7.3% | -12.0% | -11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.4% | +12.4% | -7.0% | +19.4% | -8.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.8% | +75.4% | -6.8% | +250.0% | +65.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.4% | -35.5% | -53.8% | -44.0% | -24.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.8% | +84.5% | +40.2% | -54.1% | +283.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | +20.6% | -2.3% | +51.8% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
BEKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BEKE is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COMP's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEKE currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs COMP's 66.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.21x | 1.06x | 1.79x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.98 | $192.67 | $38.08 | $13.96 | $139.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.40 | $103.71 | $24.51 | $5.66 | $95.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +73.4% | +80.6% | +66.2% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.5 | 49.5 | 49.7 | 42.3 | 41.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 10.3M | 10.0M | 14.5M | 6.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BEKE and BABA and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BEKE as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", JD as "Buy", COMP as "Buy", PDD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.7% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 7.1% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.57% vs BABA's 1.26%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.13 | $194.23 | $32.86 | $14.29 | $142.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 59 | 45 | 10 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +1.3% | +2.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.40 | $12.14 | $5.37 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +3.8% | +8.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PDD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BEKE vs BABA vs JD vs COMP vs PDD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BEKE or BABA or JD or COMP or PDD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). JD. com, Inc. (JD) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (1. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BEKE or BABA or JD or COMP or PDD?
On trailing P/E, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus KE Holdings Inc. at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, PDD Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BEKE or BABA or JD or COMP or PDD?
Over the past 5 years, PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) delivered a total return of -24. 0%, compared to -60. 4% for KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PDD returned +283. 2% versus COMP's -54. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BEKE or BABA or JD or COMP or PDD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Compass, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning COMP is approximately 117% more volatile than BEKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 58% for Compass, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BEKE or BABA or JD or COMP or PDD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PDD Holdings Inc. grew EPS 84. 8% year-over-year, compared to -29. 4% for KE Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PDD leads at 61. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BEKE or BABA or JD or COMP or PDD?
PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus -0. 8% for Compass, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PDD leads at 27. 5% versus -0. 4% for COMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PDD leads at 60. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BEKE or BABA or JD or COMP or PDD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) trades at 1. 2x forward P/E versus 56. 5x for Compass, Inc. — 55. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 54. 7% to $14. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — BEKE or BABA or JD or COMP or PDD?
In this comparison, JD (2.
6% yield), BEKE (1. 9% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. COMP, PDD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BEKE or BABA or JD or COMP or PDD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 1. 9% yield). Compass, Inc. (COMP) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEKE: -46. 8%, COMP: -54. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BEKE and BABA and JD and COMP and PDD?
These companies operate in different sectors (BEKE (Real Estate) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and JD (Consumer Cyclical) and COMP (Technology) and PDD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BEKE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; PDD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BEKE, BABA, JD pay a dividend while COMP, PDD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.