Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $275M | $513M | $2.38B | $1.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $97M | $344M | $867M | $656M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $32M | $169M | $71M |
| Gross Margin | 48.4% | 44.1% | 72.1% | 54.5% |
| Operating Margin | -10.3% | 9.0% | 25.3% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.1x | 10.9x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $324M | $1.26B | $327M | $1.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $167M | $185M | $135M |
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Foundry Bancorp (BLFY) | 100 | 106.9 | +6.9% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 62.8 | -37.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 122.2 | +22.2% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 92.6 | -7.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLFY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.2%, EPS growth 7.3%
- 11.2% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7%
KRNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 5.4%
- Beta 0.82, yield 5.4%, current ratio 1.20x
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BLFY's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.82 vs BLFY's 1.36
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 104.0% 10Y total return vs OCFC's 45.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- PEG 1.55 vs OCFC's 3.55
- NIM 3.1% vs KRNY's 1.7%
OCFC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.2% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BLFY's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs BLFY's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, vs NBTB's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.0% vs NBTB's +8.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BLFY's 0.6% |
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 4 of 6 categories
BLFY leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • OCFC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 8.9x BLFY's $97M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLFY's -10.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $97M | $344M | $867M | $656M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $43M | $241M | $103M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $32M | $169M | $71M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $40M | $225M | $80M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | +44.1% | +72.1% | +54.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +9.0% | +25.3% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +7.6% | +19.5% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | +6.2% | +25.2% | +12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.2% | +50.0% | +39.5% | -36.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.7x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 30% valuation discount to KRNY's 19.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.95x vs OCFC's 5.78x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $275M | $513M | $2.4B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $597M | $1.6B | $2.5B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.07x | 19.43x | 13.69x | 16.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.06x | 10.94x | 9.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.95x | 5.78x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 44.66x | 10.46x | 27.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.15x | 1.49x | 2.74x | 1.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 0.69x | 1.22x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.84x | 23.99x | 10.87x | 13.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-3 for BLFY. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRNY scores 7/9 vs OCFC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | +4.3% | +9.5% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | +0.4% | +1.1% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.1% | +1.1% | +7.9% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.5% | +1.5% | +2.4% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.04x | 1.68x | 0.17x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $271M | $1.1B | $142M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $167M | $185M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $324M | $1.3B | $327M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.21x | 0.22x | 1.05x | 0.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $13,353 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,045 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +35.0% total return vs NBTB's +8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBTB at 15.9% vs KRNY's 10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +14.0% | +10.5% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.5% | +35.0% | +8.6% | +17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.2% | +33.8% | +55.7% | +55.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.6% | -19.6% | +33.5% | +2.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.6% | -8.4% | +104.0% | +45.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +10.2% | +15.9% | +15.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KRNY and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLFY's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs BLFY's 89.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 0.82x | 0.88x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.74 | $8.50 | $46.92 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.61 | $5.76 | $39.20 | $16.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +96.0% | +97.2% | +91.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 54.5 | 56.2 | 51.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 274K | 301K | 237K | 662K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRNY and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLFY as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.4% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs -9.4% for BLFY (target: $12). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.40% vs NBTB's 3.13%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $9.50 | $46.00 | $19.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 5 | 10 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.4% | +3.1% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.44 | $1.43 | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.1% | +0.1% | +0.4% | +7.6% |
NBTB leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blue Foundry Bancorp (BLFY) is the stronger pick with 11.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Blue Foundry Bancorp (BLFY) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 7x versus Kearny Financial Corp. at 19. 4x. On forward P/E, OceanFirst Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 55x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +33. 5%, compared to -19. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +104. 0% versus KRNY's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kearny Financial Corp.
(KRNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Blue Foundry Bancorp's 1. 36β — meaning BLFY is approximately 66% more volatile than KRNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blue Foundry Bancorp (BLFY) is pulling ahead at 11.
2% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -29. 1% for OceanFirst Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -10. 3% for Blue Foundry Bancorp — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -10. 3% for BLFY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 55x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 55x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Kearny Financial Corp. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 16. 4% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
In this comparison, KRNY (5.
4% yield), OCFC (4. 5% yield), NBTB (3. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BLFY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88), 3. 1% yield, +104. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +104. 0%, BLFY: +2. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLFY and KRNY and NBTB and OCFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BLFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock. KRNY, NBTB, OCFC pay a dividend while BLFY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.