Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BLKB vs EVTC vs PCOR vs JAMF vs ALKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
BLKB vs EVTC vs PCOR vs JAMF vs ALKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.74B | $1.44B | $8.07B | $1.75B | $1.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.14B | $951M | $1.37B | $691M | $472M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $141M | $133M | $-77M | $-41M | $-50M |
| Gross Margin | 59.2% | 46.4% | 79.6% | 76.8% | 57.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | 19.1% | -7.1% | -5.0% | -9.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 6.0x | 29.6x | 13.4x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.12B | $1.13B | $118M | $370M | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $759M | $306M | $481M | $225M | $63M |
BLKB vs EVTC vs PCOR vs JAMF vs ALKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blackbaud, Inc. (BLKB) | 100 | 53.5 | -46.5% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| Procore Technologie… (PCOR) | 100 | 61.9 | -38.1% |
| Jamf Holding Corp. (JAMF) | 100 | 37.6 | -62.4% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 52.4 | -47.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLKB vs EVTC vs PCOR vs JAMF vs ALKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLKB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.10 vs EVTC's 0.66
- Lower P/E (7.3x vs 21.7x)
EVTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 0.8%
- 89.5% 10Y total return vs PCOR's -39.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 0.76, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.07x
Among these 5 stocks, PCOR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JAMF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +19.5% vs BLKB's -39.8%
ALKT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -12.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.5%
- 32.9% revenue growth vs BLKB's -2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs BLKB's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 21.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs PCOR's 1.40 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.5% vs BLKB's -39.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 10.2% vs -8.6% |
BLKB vs EVTC vs PCOR vs JAMF vs ALKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BLKB vs EVTC vs PCOR vs JAMF vs ALKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BLKB leads in 2 of 6 categories
EVTC leads 0 • PCOR leads 0 • JAMF leads 0 • ALKT leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLKB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCOR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 2.9x ALKT's $472M. EVTC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, ALKT holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $951M | $1.4B | $691M | $472M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $307M | $316M | $16M | $18M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $141M | $133M | -$77M | -$41M | -$50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $292M | $145M | $275M | $108M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.2% | +46.4% | +79.6% | +76.8% | +57.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +19.1% | -7.1% | -5.0% | -9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +13.9% | -5.6% | -6.0% | -10.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +15.2% | +20.0% | +15.6% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.9% | +8.4% | +15.7% | +15.2% | +28.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | -24.0% | +72.7% | +68.6% | -22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BLKB and EVTC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, EVTC trades at a 33% valuation discount to BLKB's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BLKB offers better value at 0.22x vs EVTC's 1.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $1.4B | $8.1B | $1.7B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $2.3B | $7.7B | $1.9B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.95x | 10.62x | -79.88x | -24.62x | -37.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.27x | 5.97x | 29.64x | 13.43x | 21.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.22x | 1.18x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.57x | 7.34x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.54x | 1.54x | 6.10x | 2.79x | 4.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.55x | 2.11x | 6.37x | 2.33x | 5.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.74x | 10.62x | 37.52x | 78.88x | 45.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLKB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLKB delivers a 179.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $179 in annual profit, vs $-14 for ALKT. PCOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLKB's 13.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLKB scores 8/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +179.0% | +18.7% | -6.3% | -5.2% | -14.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +6.1% | -3.7% | -1.9% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.6% | +10.2% | -9.7% | -6.0% | -8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.6% | +10.5% | -8.6% | -5.9% | -9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 13.16x | 1.58x | 0.09x | 0.52x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $360M | $824M | -$362M | $145M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $759M | $306M | $481M | $225M | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $1.1B | $118M | $370M | $354M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.45x | 3.10x | -43.00x | -9.03x | -3.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — JAMF and ALKT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PCOR five years ago would be worth $6,082 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,956 for JAMF. Over the past 12 months, JAMF leads with a +19.5% total return vs BLKB's -39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKT at 12.2% vs BLKB's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.5% | -18.4% | -23.6% | +0.4% | -23.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.8% | -31.9% | -17.0% | +19.5% | -37.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.1% | -31.7% | -3.3% | -27.0% | +41.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.6% | -43.3% | -39.2% | -60.4% | -54.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.0% | +89.5% | -39.2% | -64.8% | -59.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | -11.9% | -1.1% | -9.9% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EVTC and JAMF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EVTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PCOR's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JAMF currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs BLKB's 50.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.76x | 1.40x | 1.16x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.88 | $38.56 | $82.32 | $13.06 | $31.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.95 | $22.83 | $46.08 | $7.09 | $14.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.5% | +60.6% | +65.0% | +99.9% | +55.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.4 | 40.6 | 44.5 | 66.9 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 550K | 431K | 2.1M | 0 | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EVTC and ALKT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLKB as "Hold", EVTC as "Buy", PCOR as "Buy", JAMF as "Hold", ALKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.4% upside for EVTC (target: $37) vs -0.4% for JAMF (target: $13). EVTC is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.50 | $37.00 | $67.67 | $13.00 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 18 | 24 | 15 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.20 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.5% | +4.8% | +1.6% | +2.0% | 0.0% |
BLKB leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
BLKB vs EVTC vs PCOR vs JAMF vs ALKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLKB or EVTC or PCOR or JAMF or ALKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for Blackbaud, Inc. (BLKB). EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLKB or EVTC or PCOR or JAMF or ALKT?
On trailing P/E, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Blackbaud, Inc. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, EVERTEC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Blackbaud, Inc. wins at 0. 10x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLKB or EVTC or PCOR or JAMF or ALKT?
Over the past 5 years, Procore Technologies, Inc.
(PCOR) delivered a total return of -39. 2%, compared to -60. 4% for Jamf Holding Corp. (JAMF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +89. 5% versus JAMF's -64. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLKB or EVTC or PCOR or JAMF or ALKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Procore Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning PCOR is approximately 84% more volatile than EVTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 13% for Blackbaud, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLKB or EVTC or PCOR or JAMF or ALKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus -2. 3% for Blackbaud, Inc. (BLKB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackbaud, Inc. grew EPS 142. 3% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLKB or EVTC or PCOR or JAMF or ALKT?
EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -10. 9% for Jamf Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTC leads at 20. 0% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PCOR leads at 78. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLKB or EVTC or PCOR or JAMF or ALKT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Blackbaud, Inc. (BLKB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 10x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Procore Technologies, Inc. — 23. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVTC: 58. 4% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLKB or EVTC or PCOR or JAMF or ALKT?
In this comparison, EVTC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BLKB, PCOR, JAMF, ALKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLKB or EVTC or PCOR or JAMF or ALKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVTC: +89. 5%, PCOR: -39. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLKB and EVTC and PCOR and JAMF and ALKT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BLKB is a small-cap deep-value stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PCOR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JAMF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock. EVTC pays a dividend while BLKB, PCOR, JAMF, ALKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.