Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BMRC vs WABC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BMRC vs WABC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $420M | $1.38B | $828M | $2.78B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $177M | $311M | $266M | $643M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $120M | $48M | $209M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 76.1% | 94.3% | 72.6% | 79.9% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 60.8% | 25.4% | 43.8% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 12.3x | 13.3x | 14.2x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $69M | $138M | $40M | $991M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $225M | $601M | $22M | $108M | $185M |
BMRC vs WABC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of Marin Banco… (BMRC) | 100 | 77.5 | -22.5% |
| Westamerica Bancorp… (WABC) | 100 | 93.0 | -7.0% |
| Heritage Commerce C… (HTBK) | 100 | 153.5 | +53.5% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BMRC vs WABC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BMRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 51.8%, EPS growth 6.3%
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.9%, current ratio 473.15x
- 51.8% NII/revenue growth vs WABC's -5.0%
WABC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 15.5%, current ratio 0.39x
- PEG 1.05 vs CVBF's 4.48
- NIM 4.1% vs BMRC's 2.8%
HTBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +53.4% vs NBTB's +9.0%
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WABC's 3.2%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs HTBK's 75.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.8% NII/revenue growth vs WABC's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 14.2x), PEG 1.05 vs 4.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HTBK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs HTBK's 1.04 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WABC's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HTBK's 0.5% |
BMRC vs WABC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BMRC vs WABC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WABC leads in 3 of 6 categories
HTBK leads 1 • BMRC leads 0 • CVBF leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WABC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 4.9x BMRC's $177M. WABC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTBK's 18.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $177M | $311M | $266M | $643M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $71M | $171M | $71M | $294M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $120M | $48M | $209M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | $123M | $61M | $217M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.1% | +94.3% | +72.6% | +79.9% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +60.8% | +25.4% | +43.8% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +44.6% | +18.0% | +32.5% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +44.9% | +22.8% | +33.8% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.7% | -14.5% | +47.1% | +11.1% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BMRC and WABC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, BMRC trades at a 45% valuation discount to HTBK's 17.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WABC offers better value at 0.90x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $420M | $1.4B | $828M | $2.8B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $264M | $914M | $847M | $3.7B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.55x | 10.55x | 17.24x | 13.49x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.91x | 12.34x | 13.32x | 14.24x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.26x | 0.90x | 3.00x | 4.25x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.92x | 4.58x | 11.89x | 13.02x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 4.43x | 3.11x | 4.33x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.65x | 1.17x | 1.21x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.38x | 9.85x | 13.63x | 12.81x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WABC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WABC delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for HTBK. HTBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CVBF's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HTBK scores 8/9 vs WABC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | +12.9% | +6.8% | +9.3% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +2.0% | +0.9% | +1.4% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +15.1% | +6.9% | +6.8% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +21.3% | +3.1% | +9.3% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.16x | 0.06x | 0.43x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$156M | -$463M | $18M | $883M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $225M | $601M | $22M | $108M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $69M | $138M | $40M | $991M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.02x | 11.87x | 0.95x | 2.12x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HTBK five years ago would be worth $13,069 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,651 for BMRC. Over the past 12 months, HTBK leads with a +53.4% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTBK at 29.3% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.0% | +16.7% | +13.7% | +10.9% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.7% | +15.9% | +53.4% | +13.1% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.8% | +59.4% | +116.3% | +94.0% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.5% | -1.1% | +30.7% | +12.2% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.5% | +54.8% | +75.1% | +67.6% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.2% | +16.8% | +29.3% | +24.7% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
WABC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WABC is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HTBK's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WABC currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs BMRC's 91.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.63x | 1.04x | 0.94x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.48 | $56.22 | $13.83 | $21.48 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.25 | $44.93 | $8.92 | $17.95 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +97.6% | +97.3% | +95.5% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 58.4 | 56.5 | 57.9 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 104K | 190K | 737K | 1.6M | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WABC and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BMRC as "Hold", WABC as "Hold", HTBK as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs NBTB's 3.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.25 | $57.00 | $14.50 | $24.75 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +3.2% | +3.8% | +4.0% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 27 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.01 | $1.76 | $0.52 | $0.82 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.0% | +0.5% | +2.9% | +0.4% |
WABC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HTBK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BMRC vs WABC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BMRC or WABC or HTBK or CVBF or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) is the stronger pick with 51.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BMRC or WABC or HTBK or CVBF or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Heritage Commerce Corp at 17. 2x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Westamerica Bancorporation wins at 1. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BMRC or WABC or HTBK or CVBF or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) delivered a total return of +30.
7%, compared to -13. 5% for Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus BMRC's +41. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BMRC or WABC or HTBK or CVBF or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus Heritage Commerce Corp's 1. 04β — meaning HTBK is approximately 65% more volatile than WABC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 43% for CVB Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BMRC or WABC or HTBK or CVBF or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) is pulling ahead at 51.
8% versus -5. 0% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bank of Marin Bancorp grew EPS 625. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 2% for Westamerica Bancorporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BMRC or WABC or HTBK or CVBF or NBTB?
Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the more profitable company, earning 44.
6% net margin versus 18. 0% for Heritage Commerce Corp — meaning it keeps 44. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WABC leads at 60. 8% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WABC leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BMRC or WABC or HTBK or CVBF or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for CVB Financial Corp. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BMRC or WABC or HTBK or CVBF or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 3. 2% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB).
09Is BMRC or WABC or HTBK or CVBF or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WABC: +54. 8%, HTBK: +75. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BMRC and WABC and HTBK and CVBF and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BMRC is a small-cap high-growth stock; WABC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HTBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.