Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BPOP vs WSFS vs OFG vs IBCP vs HBAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BPOP vs WSFS vs OFG vs IBCP vs HBAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9.67B | $3.80B | $1.96B | $699M | $25.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.43B | $1.36B | $863M | $315M | $12.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $833M | $287M | $205M | $69M | $2.21B |
| Gross Margin | 66.1% | 74.7% | 71.2% | 69.6% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.7% | 28.0% | 30.8% | 25.8% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 11.8x | 9.7x | 9.6x | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.58B | $303M | $580M | $117M | $18.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $403M | $1.33B | $1.04B | $52M | $1.78B |
BPOP vs WSFS vs OFG vs IBCP vs HBAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Popular, Inc. (BPOP) | 100 | 376.9 | +276.9% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 260.4 | +160.4% |
| OFG Bancorp (OFG) | 100 | 375.5 | +275.5% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| Huntington Bancshar… (HBAN) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BPOP vs WSFS vs OFG vs IBCP vs HBAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BPOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth 43.7%
- 5.7% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1%
- +53.3% vs HBAN's +12.4%
WSFS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
OFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs BPOP's 473.6%
- PEG 0.35 vs IBCP's 1.82
- NIM 4.9% vs HBAN's 2.7%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.67
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
HBAN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs WSFS's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 3.7% yield, vs BPOP's 2.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs WSFS's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.67 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs WSFS's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs HBAN's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, vs BPOP's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.3% vs HBAN's +12.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs WSFS's 0.5% |
BPOP vs WSFS vs OFG vs IBCP vs HBAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BPOP vs WSFS vs OFG vs IBCP vs HBAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OFG leads in 3 of 6 categories
BPOP leads 1 • WSFS leads 0 • IBCP leads 0 • HBAN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OFG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.5B annually — 39.6x IBCP's $315M. OFG is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HBAN's 17.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $1.4B | $863M | $315M | $12.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $408M | $285M | $89M | $3.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $833M | $287M | $205M | $69M | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $681M | $214M | $199M | $70M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.1% | +74.7% | +71.2% | +69.6% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +28.0% | +30.8% | +25.8% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +21.1% | +23.8% | +21.7% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +15.7% | +23.1% | +22.2% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.6% | +22.9% | +8.3% | +2.3% | -11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
OFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, OFG trades at a 28% valuation discount to WSFS's 14.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OFG offers better value at 0.37x vs IBCP's 1.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.7B | $3.8B | $2.0B | $699M | $25.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.9B | $2.8B | $1.5B | $764M | $42.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.10x | 14.16x | 10.16x | 10.38x | 11.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.97x | 11.79x | 9.68x | 9.56x | 11.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.76x | 0.81x | 0.37x | 1.97x | 0.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.78x | 6.80x | 5.28x | 9.39x | 15.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 2.79x | 2.28x | 2.22x | 2.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.61x | 1.44x | 1.55x | 1.41x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.20x | 17.79x | 9.86x | 9.96x | 11.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OFG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OFG delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $10 for HBAN. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBAN's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs OFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | +10.6% | +15.2% | +14.2% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.4% | +1.7% | +1.3% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +9.5% | +10.9% | +10.2% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +10.3% | +14.4% | +2.6% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.11x | 0.42x | 0.23x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | -$1.0B | -$460M | $65M | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $403M | $1.3B | $1.0B | $52M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $303M | $580M | $117M | $18.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.81x | 1.30x | 1.54x | 0.91x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BPOP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OFG five years ago would be worth $20,478 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,203 for HBAN. Over the past 12 months, BPOP leads with a +53.3% total return vs HBAN's +12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BPOP at 40.7% vs HBAN's 22.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.8% | +31.2% | +12.1% | +7.2% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.3% | +37.7% | +14.8% | +12.6% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.4% | +135.3% | +106.8% | +130.6% | +85.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.3% | +43.1% | +104.8% | +63.7% | +22.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +473.6% | +129.0% | +538.3% | +184.6% | +121.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.7% | +33.0% | +27.4% | +32.1% | +22.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WSFS and OFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OFG is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBAN's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs HBAN's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.89x | 0.70x | 0.83x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $152.95 | $73.22 | $46.85 | $37.39 | $19.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $98.51 | $49.92 | $35.71 | $29.63 | $14.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +98.4% | +97.4% | +90.8% | +83.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 64.0 | 64.8 | 50.6 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 499K | 385K | 295K | 176K | 24.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BPOP and HBAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BPOP as "Buy", WSFS as "Hold", OFG as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", HBAN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.9% upside for HBAN (target: $20) vs -2.5% for OFG (target: $45). For income investors, HBAN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs WSFS's 0.95%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $159.33 | $74.67 | $44.50 | $38.00 | $20.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 13 | 12 | 7 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +0.9% | +2.4% | +3.0% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 1 | 9 | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.92 | $0.68 | $1.10 | $1.03 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.2% | +7.6% | +4.7% | +1.8% | 0.0% |
OFG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BPOP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BPOP vs WSFS vs OFG vs IBCP vs HBAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BPOP or WSFS or OFG or IBCP or HBAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Popular, Inc.
(BPOP) is the stronger pick with 5. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). OFG Bancorp (OFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Popular, Inc. (BPOP) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BPOP or WSFS or OFG or IBCP or HBAN?
On trailing P/E, OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the cheapest at 10.
2x versus WSFS Financial Corporation at 14. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: OFG Bancorp wins at 0. 35x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BPOP or WSFS or OFG or IBCP or HBAN?
Over the past 5 years, OFG Bancorp (OFG) delivered a total return of +104.
8%, compared to +22. 0% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OFG returned +538. 3% versus HBAN's +121. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BPOP or WSFS or OFG or IBCP or HBAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus Huntington Bancshares Incorporated's 1. 09β — meaning HBAN is approximately 55% more volatile than OFG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 76% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BPOP or WSFS or OFG or IBCP or HBAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Popular, Inc.
(BPOP) is pulling ahead at 5. 7% versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Popular, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to 3. 5% for Independent Bank Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BPOP or WSFS or OFG or IBCP or HBAN?
OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus 17. 7% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OFG leads at 30. 8% versus 21. 5% for HBAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSFS leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BPOP or WSFS or OFG or IBCP or HBAN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for WSFS Financial Corporation — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBAN: 25. 9% to $20. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — BPOP or WSFS or OFG or IBCP or HBAN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 0. 9% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is BPOP or WSFS or OFG or IBCP or HBAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 2. 4% yield, +538. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OFG: +538. 3%, HBAN: +121. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BPOP and WSFS and OFG and IBCP and HBAN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.