Luxury Goods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BRLT vs LOVE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
BRLT vs LOVE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $216M | $230M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $437M | $690M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 57.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.9x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $79M | $84M |
BRLT vs LOVE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brilliant Earth Gro… (BRLT) | 100 | 10.5 | -89.5% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 23.9 | -76.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRLT vs LOVE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRLT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.20, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth -8.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 47.8%, current ratio 1.61x
LOVE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -34.2% 10Y total return vs BRLT's -90.3%
- Better valuation composite
- 1.9% margin vs BRLT's -0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs LOVE's -2.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs BRLT's -0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs LOVE's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.9% vs LOVE's -23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs BRLT's -1.6%, ROIC 3.3% vs -9.7% |
BRLT vs LOVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BRLT vs LOVE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOVE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOVE is the larger business by revenue, generating $690M annually — 1.6x BRLT's $437M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.9% (LOVE) to -0.8% (BRLT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $437M | $690M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +57.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | -1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -190.9% | -18.4% |
Valuation Metrics
LOVE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LOVE's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRLT's 116.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $216M | $230M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $175M | $330M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.64x | 22.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 116.34x | 11.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.61x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.59x | 13.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOVE leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOVE delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BRLT. BRLT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOVE scores 5/9 vs BRLT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.0% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.7% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.4% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$41M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $79M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $183M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 29.27x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LOVE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LOVE five years ago would be worth $2,300 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $970 for BRLT. Over the past 12 months, BRLT leads with a +16.9% total return vs LOVE's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOVE at -15.4% vs BRLT's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.2% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.9% | -23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.2% | -39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -77.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -34.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.2% | -15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRLT and LOVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRLT is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOVE's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOVE currently trades 72.1% from its 52-week high vs BRLT's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.10 | $21.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.21 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.5% | +72.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 299K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BRLT is the only dividend payer here at 1.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +8.7% |
LOVE leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
BRLT vs LOVE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRLT or LOVE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). The Lovesac Company (LOVE) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E (25. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BRLT or LOVE?
Over the past 5 years, The Lovesac Company (LOVE) delivered a total return of -77.
0%, compared to -90. 3% for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOVE returned -34. 2% versus BRLT's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BRLT or LOVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus The Lovesac Company's 1. 33β — meaning LOVE is approximately 11% more volatile than BRLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BRLT or LOVE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -2. 8% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Lovesac Company grew EPS -52. 4% year-over-year, compared to -888. 6% for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BRLT or LOVE?
The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
7% net margin versus -0. 8% for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOVE leads at 2. 0% versus -1. 2% for BRLT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOVE leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BRLT or LOVE?
In this comparison, BRLT (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. LOVE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BRLT or LOVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRLT: -90. 3%, LOVE: -34. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BRLT and LOVE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BRLT pays a dividend while LOVE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.