Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BRZE vs TWLO vs HUBS vs AMZN vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
BRZE vs TWLO vs HUBS vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $2.31B | $29.86B | $12.58B | $2.92T | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $738M | $5.30B | $3.30B | $742.78B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-131M | $104M | $100M | $90.80B | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 67.1% | 48.8% | 83.7% | 50.6% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -19.6% | 4.7% | 1.9% | 11.5% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 34.3x | 35.4x | 15.2x | 31.4x | 28.9x |
| Total Debt | $83M | $1.08B | $485M | $152.99B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $682M | $882M | $86.81B | $30.71B |
BRZE vs TWLO vs HUBS vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Braze, Inc. (BRZE) | 100 | 28.5 | -71.5% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 70.5 | -29.5% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 24.5 | -75.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 282.4 | +182.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRZE vs TWLO vs HUBS vs AMZN vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRZE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 24.4% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4%
TWLO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HUBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 1.18
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 23.5%, current ratio 1.52x
- Beta 1.18, current ratio 1.52x
Among these 5 stocks, AMZN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- PEG 0.97 vs AMZN's 1.12
- 37.9% margin vs BRZE's -17.8%
- 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.4% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 31.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs BRZE's -17.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs HUBS's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs BRZE's -12.9%, ROIC 25.1% vs -20.5% |
BRZE vs TWLO vs HUBS vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BRZE vs TWLO vs HUBS vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
BRZE leads 1 • TWLO leads 0 • HUBS leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HUBS and GOOGL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1006.2x BRZE's $738M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRZE's -17.8%. On growth, BRZE holds the edge at +27.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $738M | $5.3B | $3.3B | $742.8B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$131M | $415M | $166M | $155.9B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$131M | $104M | $100M | $90.8B | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | $1.0B | $712M | -$2.5B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.1% | +48.8% | +83.7% | +50.6% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.6% | +4.7% | +1.9% | +11.5% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.8% | +2.0% | +3.0% | +12.2% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +19.0% | +21.6% | -0.3% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.9% | +20.0% | +23.4% | +16.6% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.6% | +3.8% | +2.5% | +74.8% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
BRZE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.8x trailing earnings, GOOGL trades at a 96% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.23x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $29.9B | $12.6B | $2.92T | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $30.3B | $12.2B | $2.98T | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.52x | 938.43x | 284.08x | 37.82x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.32x | 35.36x | 15.21x | 31.41x | 28.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.35x | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 77.16x | 69.24x | 20.47x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.13x | 5.89x | 4.02x | 4.07x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.91x | 4.03x | 6.29x | 7.14x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.34x | 28.91x | 17.77x | 378.98x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-23 for BRZE. BRZE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWLO scores 7/9 vs BRZE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.8% | +1.3% | +5.0% | +23.3% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.9% | +1.1% | +2.7% | +11.5% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.5% | +1.6% | +0.4% | +14.7% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.4% | +1.9% | +0.5% | +15.3% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.14x | 0.23x | 0.37x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | $399M | -$397M | $66.2B | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $682M | $882M | $86.8B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $83M | $1.1B | $485M | $153.0B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 4753.07x | 39.96x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,420 for BRZE. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs HUBS's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs HUBS's -18.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.6% | +42.4% | -36.1% | +19.7% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.7% | +90.3% | -62.0% | +43.7% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.7% | +259.4% | -45.1% | +156.2% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.8% | -35.8% | -52.1% | +64.8% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.8% | +584.5% | +469.1% | +697.8% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.4% | +53.2% | -18.1% | +36.8% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HUBS and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBS is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.47x | 1.01x | 1.50x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.67 | $201.39 | $682.57 | $278.56 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.26 | $91.84 | $187.45 | $185.01 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.0% | +97.9% | +35.8% | +97.3% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 78.4 | 51.1 | 81.1 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 2.2M | 1.5M | 45.5M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BRZE as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 87.8% upside for BRZE (target: $42) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.44 | $185.17 | $306.10 | $306.77 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 52 | 47 | 94 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% | +4.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BRZE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BRZE vs TWLO vs HUBS vs AMZN vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRZE or TWLO or HUBS or AMZN or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Braze, Inc.
(BRZE) is the stronger pick with 24. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (28. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Braze, Inc. (BRZE) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRZE or TWLO or HUBS or AMZN or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, HubSpot, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 97x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRZE or TWLO or HUBS or AMZN or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -75. 8% for Braze, Inc. (BRZE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1004% versus BRZE's -76. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRZE or TWLO or HUBS or AMZN or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning AMZN is approximately 49% more volatile than HUBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Braze, Inc. (BRZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRZE or TWLO or HUBS or AMZN or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Braze, Inc.
(BRZE) is pulling ahead at 24. 4% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -19. 6% for Braze, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRZE leads at 27. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRZE or TWLO or HUBS or AMZN or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -17. 8% for Braze, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -19. 6% for BRZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRZE or TWLO or HUBS or AMZN or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 35. 4x for Twilio Inc. — 20. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRZE: 87. 8% to $42. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRZE or TWLO or HUBS or AMZN or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BRZE, TWLO, HUBS, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BRZE or TWLO or HUBS or AMZN or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 28), +1004% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +1004%, BRZE: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRZE and TWLO and HUBS and AMZN and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (BRZE (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and HUBS (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BRZE is a small-cap high-growth stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.