Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BZAIW vs GFAI vs CEVA vs NVDA vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
BZAIW vs GFAI vs CEVA vs NVDA vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $7M | $10M | $810M | $5.14T | $550.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $72M | $108M | $215.94B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-153M | $-24M | $-11M | $120.07B | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 12.9% | 15.1% | 87.2% | 71.1% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -427.2% | -27.4% | -10.1% | 60.4% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 67.3x | 25.6x | 105.1x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $3M | $6M | $11.41B | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2K | $22M | $18M | $10.61B | $14.27B |
BZAIW vs GFAI vs CEVA vs NVDA vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blaize Holdings, In… (BZAIW) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) | 100 | 104.7 | +4.7% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 176.1 | +76.1% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 564.2 | +464.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BZAIW vs GFAI vs CEVA vs NVDA vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BZAIW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GFAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CEVA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.73, yield 0.0%
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs INTC's 299.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
INTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +439.7% vs GFAI's -53.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs BZAIW's -59.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.6x vs 105.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs BZAIW's -11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs CEVA's 2.76 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +439.7% vs GFAI's -53.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs BZAIW's -232.8%, ROIC 81.8% vs -91.5% |
BZAIW vs GFAI vs CEVA vs NVDA vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BZAIW vs GFAI vs CEVA vs NVDA vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 6 of 6 categories
BZAIW leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • CEVA leads 0 • INTC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 16232.3x BZAIW's $13M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BZAIW's -11.5%. On growth, BZAIW holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $72M | $108M | $215.9B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | -$12M | -$7M | $133.2B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$153M | -$24M | -$11M | $120.1B | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$58M | -$6M | -$6M | $96.7B | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +15.1% | +87.2% | +71.1% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -27.4% | -10.1% | +60.4% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | -32.9% | -10.5% | +55.6% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -8.8% | -6.0% | +44.8% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.2% | +3.6% | +4.3% | +73.2% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +38.9% | -2.0% | +97.8% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NVDA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NVDA's 38.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INTC's 49.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $10M | $810M | $5.14T | $550.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | -$9M | $797M | $5.14T | $582.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.77x | -0.89x | -91.14x | 43.16x | -1861.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 67.35x | 25.55x | 105.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.45x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 38.59x | 49.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.26x | 0.28x | 7.57x | 23.80x | 10.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 0.16x | 2.99x | 32.85x | 4.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 1569.47x | 53.17x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-9 for BZAIW. CEVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INTC's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.7% | -69.7% | -4.2% | +76.3% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -50.2% | -3.7% | +58.1% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -91.5% | -41.6% | -2.3% | +81.8% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -126.2% | -19.1% | -2.7% | +97.2% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.08x | 0.02x | 0.07x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$19M | -$13M | $807M | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1,506 | $22M | $18M | $10.6B | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $3M | $6M | $11.4B | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -167.24x | — | 545.03x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +439.7% total return vs GFAI's -53.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs GFAI's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.1% | -26.3% | +50.4% | +12.0% | +178.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.4% | -53.2% | +59.5% | +80.7% | +439.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.1% | -93.8% | +31.6% | +625.9% | +258.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.1% | -99.5% | -35.4% | +1328.9% | +95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.1% | -99.5% | +27.2% | +23902.3% | +299.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.7% | -60.4% | +9.6% | +93.6% | +53.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NVDA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CEVA's 2.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs BZAIW's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.38x | 2.31x | 2.76x | 1.73x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.57 | $1.50 | $34.87 | $216.80 | $114.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.18 | $0.38 | $17.02 | $112.28 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.8% | +31.5% | +96.7% | +97.6% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 47.0 | 78.9 | 60.7 | 85.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 45K | 378K | 498K | 164.5M | 110.6M |
Analyst Outlook
NVDA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CEVA as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NVDA (target: $279) vs -29.6% for INTC (target: $77).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $29.33 | $278.83 | $77.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 23 | 79 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
NVDA leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
BZAIW vs GFAI vs CEVA vs NVDA vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BZAIW or GFAI or CEVA or NVDA or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -59. 7% for Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAIW). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (25. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BZAIW or GFAI or CEVA or NVDA or INTC?
On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 25.
6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BZAIW or GFAI or CEVA or NVDA or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -99.
5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BZAIW or GFAI or CEVA or NVDA or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus CEVA, Inc. 's 2. 76β — meaning CEVA is approximately 60% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 37% for Intel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BZAIW or GFAI or CEVA or NVDA or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -59. 7% for Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAIW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intel Corporation grew EPS 98. 7% year-over-year, compared to -406. 8% for Blaize Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BZAIW or GFAI or CEVA or NVDA or INTC?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -39. 4% for Blaize Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -30. 7% for BZAIW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CEVA leads at 88. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BZAIW or GFAI or CEVA or NVDA or INTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 25.
6x forward P/E versus 105. 1x for Intel Corporation — 79. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 31. 8% to $278. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — BZAIW or GFAI or CEVA or NVDA or INTC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BZAIW or GFAI or CEVA or NVDA or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+239.
0% 10Y return). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVDA: +239. 0%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BZAIW and GFAI and CEVA and NVDA and INTC?
These companies operate in different sectors (BZAIW (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and CEVA (Technology) and NVDA (Technology) and INTC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BZAIW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CEVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.