Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CACC vs ALLY vs DT vs COF vs SYF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Software - Application
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
CACC vs ALLY vs DT vs COF vs SYF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $5.45B | $13.51B | $12.09B | $119.19B | $25.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.32B | $12.15B | $1.93B | $69.25B | $19.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $453M | $852M | $185M | $2.45B | $3.60B |
| Gross Margin | 98.7% | 52.0% | 81.6% | 47.3% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | 47.6% | 8.6% | 13.0% | 3.3% | 24.2% |
| Forward P/E | 11.3x | 8.2x | 24.0x | 9.8x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $6.35B | $21.77B | $75M | $51.00B | $15.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $501M | $10.03B | $1.02B | $57.43B | $14.97B |
CACC vs ALLY vs DT vs COF vs SYF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Credit Acceptance C… (CACC) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
| Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) | 100 | 251.1 | +151.1% |
| Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) | 100 | 104.9 | +4.9% |
| Capital One Financi… (COF) | 100 | 283.0 | +183.0% |
| Synchrony Financial (SYF) | 100 | 363.3 | +263.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CACC vs ALLY vs DT vs COF vs SYF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CACC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 17.8% vs ALLY's 2.7%
- 5.1% ROA vs COF's 0.4%, ROIC 10.4% vs 1.3%
Among these 5 stocks, ALLY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth 205.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 1.40x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 1.40x
- Beta 0.80 vs CACC's 1.61, lower leverage
COF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.58, yield 1.7%
- 205.6% 10Y total return vs ALLY's 209.6%
- 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7%
- 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SYF's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
SYF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.25 vs CACC's 1.15
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 9.8x)
- 18.6% margin vs COF's 3.5%
- +39.9% vs DT's -15.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 9.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs COF's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs CACC's 1.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SYF's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.9% vs DT's -15.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs COF's 0.4%, ROIC 10.4% vs 1.3% |
CACC vs ALLY vs DT vs COF vs SYF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CACC vs ALLY vs DT vs COF vs SYF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYF leads in 2 of 6 categories
CACC leads 1 • ALLY leads 0 • DT leads 0 • COF leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CACC and SYF each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COF is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.3B annually — 35.8x DT's $1.9B. SYF is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COF's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $12.2B | $1.9B | $69.3B | $19.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $579M | $2.0B | $276M | $7.5B | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $453M | $852M | $185M | $2.5B | $3.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | -$295M | $466M | $27.7B | $9.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.7% | +52.0% | +81.6% | +47.3% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | +8.6% | +13.0% | +3.3% | +24.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +7.0% | +9.6% | +3.5% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +45.4% | — | +24.1% | +37.7% | +51.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +18.2% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.2% | +2.7% | -89.1% | +22.1% | +20.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SYF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, SYF trades at a 83% valuation discount to COF's 47.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYF offers better value at 0.24x vs CACC's 1.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $13.5B | $12.1B | $119.2B | $25.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.3B | $25.2B | $11.2B | $112.8B | $25.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.92x | 18.48x | 25.39x | 47.77x | 7.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.33x | 8.21x | 23.98x | 9.76x | 7.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.41x | — | — | — | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.98x | 12.84x | 49.01x | 14.95x | 5.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.35x | 1.11x | 7.12x | 1.72x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.87x | 0.89x | 4.68x | 0.92x | 1.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.18x | — | 27.91x | 4.56x | 2.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CACC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CACC delivers a 29.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $2 for COF. DT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CACC's 4.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CACC scores 8/9 vs ALLY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.4% | +5.5% | +6.7% | +2.4% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +0.4% | +4.5% | +0.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +2.2% | +9.0% | +1.3% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.7% | +3.0% | +7.3% | +1.4% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.17x | 1.40x | 0.03x | 0.45x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.9B | $11.7B | -$942M | -$6.4B | $209M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $501M | $10.0B | $1.0B | $57.4B | $15.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.4B | $21.8B | $75M | $51.0B | $15.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.60x | 0.22x | — | 0.14x | 1.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYF five years ago would be worth $17,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,630 for DT. Over the past 12 months, SYF leads with a +39.9% total return vs DT's -15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYF at 41.3% vs DT's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.2% | -3.0% | -4.7% | -22.0% | -11.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.9% | +38.4% | -15.7% | +4.7% | +39.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.1% | +89.1% | -8.2% | +124.7% | +181.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.3% | -8.1% | -13.7% | +30.2% | +72.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +184.8% | +209.6% | +69.3% | +205.6% | +176.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.4% | +23.7% | -2.8% | +31.0% | +41.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALLY and DT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DT is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CACC's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALLY currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs DT's 70.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 1.42x | 0.80x | 1.58x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $565.14 | $47.27 | $57.55 | $259.64 | $88.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $401.90 | $32.28 | $31.64 | $174.98 | $53.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.5% | +92.6% | +70.1% | +74.2% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.0 | 58.6 | 58.8 | 50.3 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 179K | 3.5M | 6.8M | 4.6M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — COF and SYF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CACC as "Hold", ALLY as "Buy", DT as "Buy", COF as "Buy", SYF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for COF (target: $267) vs 3.3% for CACC (target: $540). For income investors, COF offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs SYF's 1.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $540.00 | $53.33 | $49.81 | $267.18 | $90.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 38 | 34 | 56 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.7% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.27 | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +3.4% | +11.4% |
SYF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CACC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CACC vs ALLY vs DT vs COF vs SYF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CACC or ALLY or DT or COF or SYF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is the stronger pick with 28.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). Synchrony Financial (SYF) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CACC or ALLY or DT or COF or SYF?
On trailing P/E, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the cheapest at 8.
0x versus Capital One Financial Corporation at 47. 8x. On forward P/E, Synchrony Financial is actually cheaper at 8. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Synchrony Financial wins at 0. 25x versus Credit Acceptance Corporation's 1. 15x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CACC or ALLY or DT or COF or SYF?
Over the past 5 years, Synchrony Financial (SYF) delivered a total return of +72.
2%, compared to -13. 7% for Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALLY returned +209. 6% versus DT's +69. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CACC or ALLY or DT or COF or SYF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dynatrace, Inc.
(DT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Credit Acceptance Corporation's 1. 61β — meaning CACC is approximately 100% more volatile than DT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for Credit Acceptance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CACC or ALLY or DT or COF or SYF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is pulling ahead at 28.
4% versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dynatrace, Inc. grew EPS 205. 8% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Capital One Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CACC or ALLY or DT or COF or SYF?
Dynatrace, Inc.
(DT) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 3. 5% for Capital One Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CACC leads at 47. 6% versus 3. 3% for COF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CACC leads at 98. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CACC or ALLY or DT or COF or SYF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Credit Acceptance Corporation's 1. 15x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Synchrony Financial (SYF) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Dynatrace, Inc. — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COF: 38. 8% to $267. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — CACC or ALLY or DT or COF or SYF?
In this comparison, COF (1.
7% yield), SYF (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CACC, ALLY, DT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CACC or ALLY or DT or COF or SYF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dynatrace, Inc.
(DT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80)). Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DT: +69. 3%, CACC: +184. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CACC and ALLY and DT and COF and SYF?
These companies operate in different sectors (CACC (Financial Services) and ALLY (Financial Services) and DT (Technology) and COF (Financial Services) and SYF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CACC is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALLY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SYF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. COF, SYF pay a dividend while CACC, ALLY, DT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.