Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CADE vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CADE
Cadence Bank

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.85B
5Y Perf.+89.4%
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.29B
5Y Perf.+99.7%
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+18.5%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$699M
5Y Perf.+154.3%

CADE vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CADE logoCADE
HOMB logoHOMB
SFNC logoSFNC
IBCP logoIBCP
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$7.85B$5.29B$3.09B$699M
Revenue (TTM)$2.90B$1.45B$627M$315M
Net Income (TTM)$530M$458M$-398M$69M
Gross Margin59.3%65.6%5.8%69.6%
Operating Margin23.3%36.0%-84.2%25.8%
Forward P/E12.1x10.8x10.3x9.6x
Total Debt$34M$1.20B$641M$117M
Cash & Equiv.$1.73B$910M$380M$52M

CADE vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CADE
HOMB
SFNC
IBCP
StockMay 20Jan 26Return
Cadence Bank (CADE)100189.4+89.4%
Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB)100199.7+99.7%
Simmons First Natio… (SFNC)100118.5+18.5%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100254.3+154.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CADE vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HOMB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Cadence Bank is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. IBCP also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CADE
Cadence Bank
The Banking Pick

CADE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.

  • 32.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
  • +44.1% vs HOMB's -1.9%
Best for: growth and momentum
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
  • Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 3.6%
  • NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation
The Financial Play

SFNC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 184.6% 10Y total return vs CADE's 122.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • PEG 1.82 vs HOMB's 3.55
  • Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCADE logoCADE32.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
ValueIBCP logoIBCPLower P/E (9.6x vs 10.8x), PEG 1.82 vs 3.55
Quality / MarginsHOMB logoHOMBEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyHOMB logoHOMBBeta 0.82 vs CADE's 1.41
DividendsHOMB logoHOMB2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0%
Momentum (1Y)CADE logoCADE+44.1% vs HOMB's -1.9%
Efficiency (ROA)HOMB logoHOMBEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%

CADE vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CADECadence Bank

Segment breakdown not available.

HOMBHome Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
52.3%$43M
Deposit Account
47.7%$39M
SFNCSimmons First National Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
36.8%$51M
Fiduciary and Trust
28.5%$39M
Credit and Debit Card
24.7%$34M
Mortgage Loans
5.9%$8M
Financial Service, Other
4.1%$6M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M

CADE vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCADELAGGINGIBCP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

CADE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 9.2x IBCP's $315M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.

MetricCADE logoCADECadence BankHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.9B$1.5B$627M$315M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$722M$601M-$497M$89M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$530M$458M-$398M$69M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$508M$354M$755M$70M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+59.3%+65.6%+5.8%+69.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.3%+36.0%-84.2%+25.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.0%+27.7%-63.4%+21.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+26.7%+29.1%+71.7%+22.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.9%+26.0%+42.1%+2.3%
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SFNC and IBCP each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 32% valuation discount to CADE's 15.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBCP offers better value at 1.97x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCADE logoCADECadence BankHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Market CapShares × price$7.8B$5.3B$3.1B$699M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.1B$5.6B$3.4B$764M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.20x13.36x-7.24x10.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.12x10.82x10.35x9.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.01x4.39x1.97x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.00x10.12x9.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.70x3.64x4.93x2.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.40x1.36x0.84x1.41x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.10x12.53x6.88x9.96x
Evenly matched — SFNC and IBCP each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CADE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. CADE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOMB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCADE logoCADECadence BankHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.7%+10.9%-11.6%+14.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+2.0%-1.6%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.7%+7.2%-9.1%+10.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.4%+9.8%-4.2%+2.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96748
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.30x0.19x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.7B$292M$261M$65M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.7B$910M$380M$52M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$34M$1.2B$641M$117M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.66x1.44x-1.01x0.91x
CADE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CADE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, CADE leads with a +44.1% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CADE at 35.0% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCADE logoCADECadence BankHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.8%-3.0%+14.6%+7.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.1%-1.9%+16.7%+12.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+146.0%+42.0%+53.4%+130.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.3%+6.6%-15.4%+63.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+122.6%+58.2%+25.2%+184.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+35.0%+12.4%+15.3%+32.1%
CADE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CADE's 1.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCADE logoCADECadence BankHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.41x0.82x1.02x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$46.74$30.83$22.18$37.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$29.62$25.68$17.00$29.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.1%+87.1%+96.3%+90.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.750.362.350.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded80.6M1.4M1.2M176K
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CADE as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -5.6% for CADE (target: $40). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs CADE's 2.34%.

MetricCADE logoCADECadence BankHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$39.75$32.00$22.67$38.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts201997
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%+2.8%+4.0%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1221611
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.98$0.75$0.85$1.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.5%+1.6%0.0%+1.8%
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CADE leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.

Best OverallCadence Bank (CADE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CADE vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CADE or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the stronger pick with 32.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CADE or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

4x versus Cadence Bank at 15. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Independent Bank Corporation wins at 1. 82x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CADE or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.

7%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CADE or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Cadence Bank's 1. 41β — meaning CADE is approximately 72% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cadence Bank (CADE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for Home Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CADE or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadence Bank (CADE) is pulling ahead at 32.

4% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 3. 6% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CADE or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CADE or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 82x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Cadence Bank — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CADE or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 3% for Cadence Bank (CADE).

09

Is CADE or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, CADE: +122. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CADE and HOMB and SFNC and IBCP?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CADE is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CADE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOMB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SFNC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBCP

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CADE and HOMB and SFNC and IBCP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CADE: 32.4% · HOMB: 9.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(CADE: 18.0% · HOMB: 27.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CADE: 15.2x · HOMB: 13.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.