Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $203M | $250M | $21M | $2.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $514M | $3.46B | $2.26B | $1.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-178M | $-280M | $178M |
| Gross Margin | 0.4% | 13.6% | 6.5% | 46.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 7.3% | -8.4% | 10.2% |
| Forward P/E | 50.9x | 5.7x | — | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $60M | $170M | $1.75B | $1.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $1.29B | $25M | $142M |
CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Auto Logistic… (CALI) | 100 | 50415000.0 | +50414900.0% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 32.5 | -67.5% |
| Uxin Limited (UXIN) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
| OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) | 100 | 200.5 | +100.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CALI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 49.7% 10Y total return vs KAR's 99.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 0.01, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 0.01 vs CANG's 2.25
CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 2.25
- Lower P/E (5.7x vs 19.3x)
UXIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 45.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
KAR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 264.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.2%
- 9.2% margin vs UXIN's -12.4%
- 1.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +43.1% vs CANG's -73.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.7x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.2% margin vs UXIN's -12.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs CANG's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.1% vs CANG's -73.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs UXIN's -14.2%, ROIC 6.9% vs -11.2% |
CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KAR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CALI leads 1 • CANG leads 1 • UXIN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 6.7x CALI's $514M. KAR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UXIN's -12.4%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $514M | $3.5B | $2.3B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$969,068 | $333M | -$178M | $288M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$178M | -$280M | $178M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $466,701 | $0 | $0 | $337M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +13.6% | +6.5% | +46.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +7.3% | -8.4% | +10.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | -5.2% | -12.4% | +9.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -154.0% | -13.3% | +17.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.1% | +58.3% | +64.1% | +0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | +3.6% | +94.9% | +89.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CANG and UXIN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 89% valuation discount to CALI's 50.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALI's 829.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $203M | $250M | $21M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $260M | $85M | $274M | $4.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 50.92x | 5.66x | -0.54x | 16.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 19.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 829.19x | 3.13x | — | 14.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 2.12x | 0.07x | 1.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.63x | 0.42x | — | 1.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 8.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KAR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KAR delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CALI. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CALI's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KAR scores 8/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.4% | -4.1% | — | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | -2.3% | -14.2% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.1% | +4.6% | -11.2% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | +4.5% | -19.4% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.55x | 0.04x | — | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $57M | -$1.1B | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $1.3B | $25M | $142M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $60M | $170M | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.35x | -1.87x | -1.99x | 3.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CALI and KAR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CALI five years ago would be worth $5,429,458,654 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $100 for UXIN. Over the past 12 months, KAR leads with a +43.1% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KAR at 22.2% vs UXIN's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | -62.0% | -21.5% | -6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.9% | -73.7% | -36.5% | +43.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.5% | +1.2% | -76.7% | +82.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54294486.5% | -14.2% | -99.0% | +61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4974.3% | -44.9% | -99.7% | +99.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.8% | +0.4% | -38.5% | +22.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CALI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CALI is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CALI currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 2.25x | 1.19x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.79 | $2.88 | $5.36 | $31.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.04 | $0.33 | $2.45 | $19.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +18.6% | +53.0% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 58.6 | 44.1 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 84K | 1.3M | 159K | 976K |
Analyst Outlook
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", UXIN as "Hold", KAR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 16.6% for KAR (target: $32). KAR is the only dividend payer here at 1.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.00 | $4.50 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 3 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
KAR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CALI leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uxin Limited (UXIN) is the stronger pick with 45.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus China Auto Logistics Inc. at 50. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?
Over the past 5 years, China Auto Logistics Inc.
(CALI) delivered a total return of +542945%, compared to -99. 0% for Uxin Limited (UXIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALI returned +49. 7% versus UXIN's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), China Auto Logistics Inc.
(CALI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 35081% more volatile than CALI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for China Auto Logistics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uxin Limited (UXIN) is pulling ahead at 45.
0% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 89. 2% for Uxin Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, KAR leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -13. 7% for Uxin Limited — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -11. 7% for UXIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459.
2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?
In this comparison, KAR (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CALI, CANG, UXIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, China Auto Logistics Inc.
(CALI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01)). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CALI: +49. 7%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CALI and CANG and UXIN and KAR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CALI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; UXIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; KAR is a small-cap deep-value stock. KAR pays a dividend while CALI, CANG, UXIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.