Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CALI
China Auto Logistics Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$203M
5Y Perf.+50414900.0%
CANG
Cango Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.-67.5%
UXIN
Uxin Limited

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-97.6%
KAR
OPENLANE, Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.91B
5Y Perf.+100.5%

CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CALI logoCALI
CANG logoCANG
UXIN logoUXIN
KAR logoKAR
IndustryAuto - DealershipsAuto - DealershipsAuto - DealershipsAuto - Dealerships
Market Cap$203M$250M$21M$2.91B
Revenue (TTM)$514M$3.46B$2.26B$1.93B
Net Income (TTM)$-1M$-178M$-280M$178M
Gross Margin0.4%13.6%6.5%46.2%
Operating Margin-0.2%7.3%-8.4%10.2%
Forward P/E50.9x5.7x19.3x
Total Debt$60M$170M$1.75B$1.42B
Cash & Equiv.$3M$1.29B$25M$142M

CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KARLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CALI
CANG
UXIN
KAR
StockJan 22May 26Return
China Auto Logistic… (CALI)10050415000.0+50414900.0%
Cango Inc. (CANG)10032.5-67.5%
Uxin Limited (UXIN)1002.4-97.6%
OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR)100200.5+100.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KAR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. China Auto Logistics Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. CANG and UXIN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CALI
China Auto Logistics Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CALI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 49.7% 10Y total return vs KAR's 99.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 1.17x
  • Beta 0.01, current ratio 1.17x
  • Beta 0.01 vs CANG's 2.25
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Income Pick

CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 2.25
  • Lower P/E (5.7x vs 19.3x)
Best for: income & stability
UXIN
Uxin Limited
The Growth Leader

UXIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 45.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
Best for: growth
KAR
OPENLANE, Inc.
The Growth Play

KAR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 264.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.2%
  • 9.2% margin vs UXIN's -12.4%
  • 1.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +43.1% vs CANG's -73.7%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUXIN logoUXIN45.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
ValueCANG logoCANGLower P/E (5.7x vs 19.3x)
Quality / MarginsKAR logoKAR9.2% margin vs UXIN's -12.4%
Stability / SafetyCALI logoCALIBeta 0.01 vs CANG's 2.25
DividendsKAR logoKAR1.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)KAR logoKAR+43.1% vs CANG's -73.7%
Efficiency (ROA)KAR logoKAR3.8% ROA vs UXIN's -14.2%, ROIC 6.9% vs -11.2%

CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CALIChina Auto Logistics Inc.
FY 2016
Automobiles
99.1%$463M
Financing Services
0.9%$4M
Other Services
0.0%$33,660
CANGCango Inc.
FY 2024
After-market Service Facilitation Service Income
62.9%$41M
Loan Facilitation Income And Other Related Income
24.1%$16M
Automobile trading income
9.6%$6M
Service, Other
3.4%$2M
UXINUxin Limited
FY 2022
Retail Vehicle Sales
63.8%$1.3B
Wholesale Vehicle Sales
34.4%$707M
Service Other
1.9%$39M
KAROPENLANE, Inc.
FY 2024
Marketplace
75.9%$1.4B
Finance
24.1%$431M

CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKARLAGGINGUXIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 6.7x CALI's $514M. KAR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UXIN's -12.4%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.UXIN logoUXINUxin LimitedKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$514M$3.5B$2.3B$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$969,068$333M-$178M$288M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1M-$178M-$280M$178M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$466,701$0$0$337M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+0.4%+13.6%+6.5%+46.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-0.2%+7.3%-8.4%+10.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.3%-5.2%-12.4%+9.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.1%-154.0%-13.3%+17.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+58.3%+64.1%+0.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.6%+3.6%+94.9%+89.7%
KAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CANG and UXIN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 89% valuation discount to CALI's 50.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALI's 829.2x.

MetricCALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.UXIN logoUXINUxin LimitedKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$203M$250M$21M$2.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$260M$85M$274M$4.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS50.92x5.66x-0.54x16.73x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.31x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple829.19x3.13x14.55x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.44x2.12x0.07x1.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.63x0.42x1.93x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.66x
Evenly matched — CANG and UXIN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KAR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KAR delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CALI. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CALI's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KAR scores 8/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.UXIN logoUXINUxin LimitedKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.4%-4.1%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.9%-2.3%-14.2%+3.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.1%+4.6%-11.2%+6.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.8%+4.5%-19.4%+9.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96468
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.55x0.04x0.93x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$57M-$1.1B$1.7B$1.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$1.3B$25M$142M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$60M$170M$1.7B$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.35x-1.87x-1.99x3.09x
KAR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CALI and KAR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CALI five years ago would be worth $5,429,458,654 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $100 for UXIN. Over the past 12 months, KAR leads with a +43.1% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KAR at 22.2% vs UXIN's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.UXIN logoUXINUxin LimitedKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.4%-62.0%-21.5%-6.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+2.9%-73.7%-36.5%+43.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+8.5%+1.2%-76.7%+82.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+54294486.5%-14.2%-99.0%+61.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4974.3%-44.9%-99.7%+99.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.8%+0.4%-38.5%+22.2%
Evenly matched — CALI and KAR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CALI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CALI is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CALI currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.UXIN logoUXINUxin LimitedKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.01x2.25x1.19x0.98x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$50.79$2.88$5.36$31.78
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$50.04$0.33$2.45$19.02
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+18.6%+53.0%+86.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.558.644.140.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded84K1.3M159K976K
CALI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", UXIN as "Hold", KAR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 16.6% for KAR (target: $32). KAR is the only dividend payer here at 1.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.UXIN logoUXINUxin LimitedKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.00$4.50$32.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2318
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises50
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.36
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.3%0.0%+1.6%
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

KAR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CALI leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallOPENLANE, Inc. (KAR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CALI vs CANG vs UXIN vs KAR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Uxin Limited (UXIN) is the stronger pick with 45.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?

On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus China Auto Logistics Inc. at 50. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?

Over the past 5 years, China Auto Logistics Inc.

(CALI) delivered a total return of +542945%, compared to -99. 0% for Uxin Limited (UXIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALI returned +49. 7% versus UXIN's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), China Auto Logistics Inc.

(CALI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 35081% more volatile than CALI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for China Auto Logistics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uxin Limited (UXIN) is pulling ahead at 45.

0% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 89. 2% for Uxin Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, KAR leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?

Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -13. 7% for Uxin Limited — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -11. 7% for UXIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459.

2% to $3. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR?

In this comparison, KAR (1.

3% yield) pays a dividend. CALI, CANG, UXIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CALI or CANG or UXIN or KAR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, China Auto Logistics Inc.

(CALI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01)). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CALI: +49. 7%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CALI and CANG and UXIN and KAR?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CALI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; UXIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; KAR is a small-cap deep-value stock. KAR pays a dividend while CALI, CANG, UXIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CALI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CANG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 2916%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UXIN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KAR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CALI and CANG and UXIN and KAR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CALI: 30.1% · CANG: 5833.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CALI: 50.9x · CANG: 5.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.