Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CANG vs AMZN vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
CANG vs AMZN vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $250M | $2.92T | $340.44B | $46.46B | $48.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.46B | $742.78B | $1.01T | $1.30T | $130.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-178M | $90.80B | $123.35B | $32.20B | $9.00B |
| Gross Margin | 13.6% | 50.6% | 41.2% | 12.7% | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 11.5% | 10.9% | 1.3% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 5.7x | 34.8x | 4.1x | 1.4x | 2.6x |
| Total Debt | $170M | $152.99B | $248.49B | $89.77B | $79.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.29B | $86.81B | $181.73B | $108.35B | $24.83B |
CANG vs AMZN vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 22.4 | -77.6% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 68.0 | -32.0% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 55.6 | -44.4% |
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 131.3 | +31.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CANG vs AMZN vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, CANG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs BABA's 83.4%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
- 12.2% margin vs CANG's -5.2%
BABA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 22.8%, current ratio 1.54x
- 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
JD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.6%
- Beta 1.06, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.29x
- Lower P/E (1.4x vs 4.1x)
- Beta 1.06 vs CANG's 2.25
BIDU is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.04 vs AMZN's 1.24
- +61.3% vs CANG's -73.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 4.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs CANG's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs CANG's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.3% vs CANG's -73.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs 4.6% |
CANG vs AMZN vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CANG vs AMZN vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories
CANG leads 0 • BABA leads 0 • JD leads 0 • BIDU leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 376.9x CANG's $3.5B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CANG's -5.2%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.5B | $742.8B | $1.01T | $1.30T | $130.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $333M | $155.9B | $114.6B | $23.8B | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$178M | $90.8B | $123.4B | $32.2B | $9.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$2.5B | $2.6B | $9.1B | -$15.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +50.6% | +41.2% | +12.7% | +44.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +11.5% | +10.9% | +1.3% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +12.2% | +12.2% | +2.5% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -154.0% | -0.3% | +0.3% | +0.7% | -12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.3% | +16.6% | +4.8% | +14.9% | -7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +74.8% | -52.0% | -56.3% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CANG and JD each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 85% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIDU offers better value at 0.24x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $250M | $2.92T | $340.4B | $46.5B | $48.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $85M | $2.98T | $350.3B | $43.7B | $56.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.66x | 37.82x | 17.90x | 7.64x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.77x | 4.13x | 1.43x | 2.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x | — | 0.29x | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.13x | 20.47x | 13.55x | 6.40x | 10.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.12x | 4.07x | 2.33x | 0.27x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.42x | 7.14x | 2.12x | 1.01x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x | 29.64x | 7.14x | 25.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CANG. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.1% | +23.3% | +11.2% | +10.5% | +3.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | +11.5% | +6.7% | +4.6% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +14.7% | +9.6% | +9.9% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +15.3% | +10.4% | +10.2% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.37x | 0.23x | 0.29x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | $66.2B | $66.8B | -$18.6B | $54.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $86.8B | $181.7B | $108.3B | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $170M | $153.0B | $248.5B | $89.8B | $79.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.87x | 39.96x | 15.74x | 12.85x | 9.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,615 for JD. Over the past 12 months, BIDU leads with a +61.3% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs JD's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -62.0% | +19.7% | -9.5% | +5.7% | -6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.7% | +43.7% | +16.0% | -7.7% | +61.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | +156.2% | +74.8% | -8.2% | +14.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.2% | +64.8% | -35.4% | -53.8% | -27.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.9% | +697.8% | +83.4% | +48.7% | -17.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | +36.8% | +20.5% | -2.8% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMZN and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JD is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 1.51x | 1.21x | 1.06x | 1.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.88 | $278.56 | $192.67 | $38.08 | $165.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.33 | $185.01 | $103.71 | $24.51 | $81.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.6% | +97.3% | +73.2% | +79.3% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 81.1 | 61.8 | 58.0 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 45.5M | 10.4M | 10.1M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CANG and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", JD as "Buy", BIDU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 8.8% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.61% vs BABA's 1.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | $306.77 | $194.23 | $32.86 | $154.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 94 | 59 | 45 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.3% | +2.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $12.14 | $5.37 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | 0.0% | +3.8% | +8.2% | +1.9% |
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
CANG vs AMZN vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CANG or AMZN or BABA or JD or BIDU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CANG or AMZN or BABA or JD or BIDU?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, JD. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Baidu, Inc. wins at 0. 04x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CANG or AMZN or BABA or JD or BIDU?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -53. 8% for JD. com, Inc. (JD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus CANG's -44. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CANG or AMZN or BABA or JD or BIDU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 112% more volatile than JD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CANG or AMZN or BABA or JD or BIDU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 19. 6% for Baidu, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CANG or AMZN or BABA or JD or BIDU?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus 3. 6% for JD. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus 3. 3% for JD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CANG or AMZN or BABA or JD or BIDU more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JD. com, Inc. (JD) trades at 1. 4x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 33. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459. 2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CANG or AMZN or BABA or JD or BIDU?
In this comparison, JD (2.
6% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CANG, AMZN, BIDU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CANG or AMZN or BABA or JD or BIDU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), 2. 6% yield). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JD: +48. 7%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CANG and AMZN and BABA and JD and BIDU?
These companies operate in different sectors (CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and JD (Consumer Cyclical) and BIDU (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock. BABA, JD pay a dividend while CANG, AMZN, BIDU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.