Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CAPR vs SRPT vs CRSP vs EXEL vs FOLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CAPR vs SRPT vs CRSP vs EXEL vs FOLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $2.18B | $5.06B | $11.74B | $4.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $2.18B | $4M | $2.38B | $634M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-82M | $65M | $-569M | $833M | $-27M |
| Gross Margin | -5.8% | 34.4% | -41.7% | 71.6% | 87.9% |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | -1.9% | -134.1% | 39.4% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.9x | — | 14.0x | 40.6x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $1.04B | $395M | $173M | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $801M | $355M | $482M | $214M |
CAPR vs SRPT vs CRSP vs EXEL vs FOLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capricor Therapeuti… (CAPR) | 100 | 731.5 | +631.5% |
| Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT) | 100 | 13.7 | -86.3% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL) | 100 | 187.0 | +87.0% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 115.9 | +15.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAPR vs SRPT vs CRSP vs EXEL vs FOLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAPR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +392.6% vs SRPT's -43.4%
SRPT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 40.6x)
CRSP is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.93, current ratio 13.32x
EXEL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.3% 10Y total return vs CRSP's 272.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 8.0%, current ratio 3.56x
- 35.1% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
- 30.5% ROA vs CAPR's -64.8%, ROIC 32.1% vs -43.8%
FOLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.63
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 51.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
- 20.0% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
- Beta 0.63 vs SRPT's 2.02
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 40.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.1% margin vs CRSP's -138.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs SRPT's 2.02 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +392.6% vs SRPT's -43.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 30.5% ROA vs CAPR's -64.8%, ROIC 32.1% vs -43.8% |
CAPR vs SRPT vs CRSP vs EXEL vs FOLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CAPR vs SRPT vs CRSP vs EXEL vs FOLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXEL leads in 2 of 6 categories
SRPT leads 1 • CAPR leads 1 • FOLD leads 1 • CRSP leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXEL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 579.0x CRSP's $4M. EXEL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CRSP holds the edge at +68.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $2.2B | $4M | $2.4B | $634M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$85M | -$6M | -$535M | $958M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$82M | $65M | -$569M | $833M | -$27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$45M | $107M | -$401M | $918M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +34.4% | -41.7% | +71.6% | +87.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | -1.9% | -134.1% | +39.4% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +3.0% | -138.6% | +35.1% | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +4.9% | -97.8% | +38.7% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -1.9% | +68.6% | +10.0% | +23.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -42.1% | +162.6% | +19.0% | +43.6% | -89.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SRPT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, EXEL's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.2B | $5.1B | $11.7B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $2.4B | $5.1B | $11.4B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.51x | -2.92x | -8.10x | 16.62x | -164.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.93x | — | 13.96x | 40.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 12.68x | 114.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 69.67x | 0.99x | 1440.41x | 5.06x | 7.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.22x | 1.91x | 2.45x | 6.03x | 16.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 13.90x | 152.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXEL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXEL delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-98 for CAPR. CAPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXEL scores 7/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -97.8% | +4.9% | -30.9% | +40.2% | -12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.8% | +1.9% | -24.5% | +30.5% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -43.8% | -31.4% | -22.3% | +32.1% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.1% | -24.0% | -26.6% | +35.0% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.91x | 0.21x | 0.08x | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $238M | $40M | -$309M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $801M | $355M | $482M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $1.0B | $395M | $173M | $483M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.00x | — | — | 1.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAPR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAPR five years ago would be worth $97,810 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,789 for SRPT. Over the past 12 months, CAPR leads with a +392.6% total return vs SRPT's -43.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAPR at 105.7% vs SRPT's -45.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.9% | -2.4% | -2.5% | +6.0% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +392.6% | -43.4% | +53.1% | +25.5% | +137.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +770.3% | -83.6% | -6.3% | +142.8% | +19.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +878.1% | -72.1% | -51.3% | +84.0% | +48.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.7% | +18.0% | +272.0% | +833.5% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +105.7% | -45.3% | -2.2% | +34.4% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SRPT's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs SRPT's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.97x | 2.02x | 1.93x | 0.80x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.37 | $44.14 | $78.48 | $49.62 | $14.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.30 | $10.42 | $33.50 | $33.76 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +47.1% | +66.8% | +93.1% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 63.4 | 55.5 | 67.6 | 72.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 3.0M | 2.0M | 2.7M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAPR as "Buy", SRPT as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy", EXEL as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.7% upside for CAPR (target: $48) vs -1.1% for EXEL (target: $46).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.75 | $24.63 | $63.00 | $45.71 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 54 | 38 | 32 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% | +8.1% | 0.0% |
EXEL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SRPT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CAPR vs SRPT vs CRSP vs EXEL vs FOLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAPR or SRPT or CRSP or EXEL or FOLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. (CAPR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAPR or SRPT or CRSP or EXEL or FOLD?
On forward P/E, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAPR or SRPT or CRSP or EXEL or FOLD?
Over the past 5 years, Capricor Therapeutics, Inc.
(CAPR) delivered a total return of +878. 1%, compared to -72. 1% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXEL returned +833. 5% versus CAPR's -4. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAPR or SRPT or CRSP or EXEL or FOLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning SRPT is approximately 221% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. (CAPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAPR or SRPT or CRSP or EXEL or FOLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exelixis, Inc. grew EPS 58. 0% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAPR leads at 349. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAPR or SRPT or CRSP or EXEL or FOLD?
Exelixis, Inc.
(EXEL) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 7% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 33. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXEL leads at 37. 6% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXEL leads at 96. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAPR or SRPT or CRSP or EXEL or FOLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
(SRPT) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 33. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAPR: 40. 7% to $47. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAPR or SRPT or CRSP or EXEL or FOLD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CAPR or SRPT or CRSP or EXEL or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exelixis, Inc.
(EXEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80), +833. 5% 10Y return). Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXEL: +833. 5%, SRPT: +18. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAPR and SRPT and CRSP and EXEL and FOLD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAPR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXEL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.