Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CAT vs ETN vs EMR vs HON vs GE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Conglomerates
Aerospace & Defense
CAT vs ETN vs EMR vs HON vs GE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Conglomerates | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $416.75B | $155.02B | $79.02B | $136.91B | $316.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $70.75B | $28.52B | $18.32B | $36.76B | $48.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9.42B | $3.99B | $2.44B | $4.10B | $8.66B |
| Gross Margin | 32.5% | 36.9% | 52.7% | 36.9% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 18.1% | 19.8% | 14.9% | 18.5% |
| Forward P/E | 38.8x | 30.0x | 21.7x | 20.5x | 40.0x |
| Total Debt | $43.33B | $11.17B | $13.76B | $34.58B | $20.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9.98B | $622M | $1.54B | $12.49B | $12.39B |
CAT vs ETN vs EMR vs HON vs GE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
| Eaton Corporation p… (ETN) | 100 | 470.2 | +370.2% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 231.2 | +131.2% |
| Honeywell Internati… (HON) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 925.2 | +825.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAT vs ETN vs EMR vs HON vs GE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs ETN's 6.1%
- +181.5% vs HON's +2.8%
- 10.0% ROA vs HON's 5.3%, ROIC 15.9% vs 12.6%
ETN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 57.4%, current ratio 1.32x
- PEG 1.22 vs HON's 11.18
Among these 5 stocks, EMR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.1%
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.32x
- Lower P/E (20.5x vs 40.0x)
- Beta 0.74 vs CAT's 1.54
GE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 36.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs EMR's 3.0%
- 17.9% margin vs HON's 11.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs EMR's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.5x vs 40.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs HON's 11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs CAT's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.5% vs HON's +2.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs HON's 5.3%, ROIC 15.9% vs 12.6% |
CAT vs ETN vs EMR vs HON vs GE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CAT vs ETN vs EMR vs HON vs GE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EMR leads in 1 of 6 categories
HON leads 1 • CAT leads 1 • ETN leads 0 • GE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 3.9x EMR's $18.3B. GE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HON's 11.2%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $70.8B | $28.5B | $18.3B | $36.8B | $48.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.0B | $5.9B | $4.7B | $6.5B | $9.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9.4B | $4.0B | $2.4B | $4.1B | $8.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11.4B | $4.7B | $3.1B | $4.2B | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +36.9% | +52.7% | +36.9% | +34.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +18.1% | +19.8% | +14.9% | +18.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +14.0% | +13.3% | +11.2% | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +16.5% | +17.0% | +11.4% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.2% | +16.8% | +2.9% | -6.9% | +24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.2% | -9.4% | +28.2% | -41.9% | -1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.4x trailing earnings, HON trades at a 38% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ETN offers better value at 1.55x vs HON's 15.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $416.8B | $155.0B | $79.0B | $136.9B | $316.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $450.1B | $165.6B | $91.2B | $159.0B | $324.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.57x | 38.17x | 34.92x | 29.36x | 37.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 38.79x | 30.00x | 21.71x | 20.52x | 40.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.69x | 1.55x | 7.73x | 15.99x | 3.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 33.41x | 27.69x | 18.07x | 19.99x | 32.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.17x | 5.65x | 4.39x | 3.66x | 6.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.71x | 7.99x | 3.94x | 9.00x | 17.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.56x | 34.67x | 29.63x | 25.39x | 43.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CAT and ETN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $12 for EMR. ETN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HON's 2.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EMR scores 7/9 vs CAT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +47.5% | +20.8% | +12.1% | +23.1% | +45.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.0% | +9.0% | +5.8% | +5.3% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.9% | +13.6% | +8.2% | +12.6% | +24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.1% | +16.8% | +10.0% | +12.6% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.03x | 0.57x | 0.68x | 2.24x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33.4B | $10.5B | $12.2B | $22.1B | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.0B | $622M | $1.5B | $12.5B | $12.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $43.3B | $11.2B | $13.8B | $34.6B | $20.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.22x | 16.38x | 6.46x | 3.92x | 11.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $46,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,326 for HON. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs HON's +2.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs HON's 5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.2% | +22.3% | +4.3% | +10.9% | -5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +181.5% | +33.2% | +30.4% | +2.8% | +44.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +324.9% | +141.3% | +75.9% | +16.2% | +280.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +282.5% | +182.8% | +59.5% | +3.3% | +362.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1227.6% | +608.7% | +206.6% | +135.1% | +121.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.0% | +34.1% | +20.7% | +5.1% | +56.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and HON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HON is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs EMR's 85.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 1.42x | 1.52x | 0.74x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $931.35 | $435.43 | $165.15 | $248.18 | $348.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $318.11 | $296.93 | $108.37 | $186.76 | $208.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +91.7% | +85.4% | +87.1% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.2 | 59.8 | 61.3 | 45.1 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 2.5M | 2.8M | 3.7M | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EMR and HON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAT as "Buy", ETN as "Buy", EMR as "Buy", HON as "Buy", GE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for GE (target: $386) vs -7.9% for CAT (target: $825). For income investors, HON offers the higher dividend yield at 2.14% vs GE's 0.45%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $824.80 | $379.78 | $161.92 | $243.83 | $386.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 53 | 39 | 41 | 28 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.0% | +1.5% | +2.1% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 24 | 37 | 15 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.86 | $4.17 | $2.10 | $4.63 | $1.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +1.2% | +1.6% | +2.8% | +2.4% |
EMR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CAT vs ETN vs EMR vs HON vs GE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAT or ETN or EMR or HON or GE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the better valuation at 29. 4x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAT or ETN or EMR or HON or GE?
On trailing P/E, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the cheapest at 29. 4x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Honeywell International Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Eaton Corporation plc wins at 1. 22x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAT or ETN or EMR or HON or GE?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +362.
5%, compared to +3. 3% for Honeywell International Inc. (HON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus GE's +121. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAT or ETN or EMR or HON or GE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 108% more volatile than HON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 2% for Honeywell International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAT or ETN or EMR or HON or GE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus 3. 0% for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Aerospace grew EPS 36. 2% year-over-year, compared to -15. 5% for Honeywell International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAT or ETN or EMR or HON or GE?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus 12. 6% for Honeywell International Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMR leads at 19. 6% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAT or ETN or EMR or HON or GE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 22x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 18x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Honeywell International Inc. (HON) trades at 20. 5x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for GE Aerospace — 19. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GE: 27. 6% to $386. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAT or ETN or EMR or HON or GE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 4% for GE Aerospace (GE).
09Is CAT or ETN or EMR or HON or GE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 7% yield, +1228% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAT: +1228%, GE: +121. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAT and ETN and EMR and HON and GE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ETN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EMR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock. CAT, ETN, EMR, HON pay a dividend while GE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.