Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CBU vs TRMK vs WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CBU vs TRMK vs WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.35B | $2.64B | $3.29B | $4.61B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $929M | $1.12B | $1.43B | $739M | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210M | $224M | $223M | $243M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 73.4% | 71.0% | 62.9% | 70.8% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 31.4% | 25.5% | 19.7% | 36.8% | -84.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 11.5x | 9.5x | 15.9x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $747M | $1.12B | $1.66B | $197M | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $302M | $668M | $205M | $763M | $380M |
CBU vs TRMK vs WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community Bank Syst… (CBU) | 100 | 107.4 | +7.4% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) | 100 | 159.7 | +59.7% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBU vs TRMK vs WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 1.49x
- Beta 0.88, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.49x
- Beta 0.88 vs SFNC's 1.02
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 127.7% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- PEG 1.42 vs FFIN's 3.05
- NIM 3.4% vs CBU's 2.9%
- +32.5% vs FFIN's -3.2%
WSBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 4.1%
- Rev growth 51.4%, EPS growth 0.0%
- 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.90 vs 3.05
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%
Among these 5 stocks, SFNC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.90 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs SFNC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
CBU vs TRMK vs WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CBU vs TRMK vs WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSBC leads in 2 of 6 categories
FFIN leads 1 • TRMK leads 1 • CBU leads 0 • SFNC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FFIN and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 2.3x SFNC's $627M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $929M | $1.1B | $1.4B | $739M | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $317M | $323M | $311M | $310M | -$497M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $210M | $224M | $223M | $243M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $218M | $230M | $262M | $290M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.4% | +71.0% | +62.9% | +70.8% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +25.5% | +19.7% | +36.8% | -84.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +20.0% | +15.5% | +30.2% | -63.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +20.7% | +19.5% | +39.6% | +71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +5.4% | +24.3% | -7.7% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WSBC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 42% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $2.6B | $3.3B | $4.6B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $3.1B | $4.7B | $4.0B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.03x | 12.13x | 15.13x | 20.76x | -7.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.53x | 11.50x | 9.54x | 15.92x | 10.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.05x | 1.50x | 3.02x | 3.98x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.97x | 9.49x | 15.25x | 14.17x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.61x | 2.36x | 2.29x | 6.23x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 1.28x | 0.76x | 2.89x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.37x | 11.39x | 11.74x | 15.73x | 6.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WSBC scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +10.8% | +5.7% | +13.3% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +1.6% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +7.1% | +4.3% | +11.0% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +3.2% | +1.8% | +16.0% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.53x | 0.41x | 0.12x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $445M | $448M | $1.5B | -$566M | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $302M | $668M | $205M | $763M | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $747M | $1.1B | $1.7B | $197M | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.51x | 0.75x | 0.62x | 1.48x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMK five years ago would be worth $14,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +32.5% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 29.8% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.6% | +15.5% | +3.7% | +8.5% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.5% | +32.5% | +17.9% | -3.2% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.8% | +118.5% | +65.2% | +29.1% | +53.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.1% | +47.6% | +5.8% | -28.2% | -15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.2% | +127.7% | +48.3% | +145.4% | +25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | +29.8% | +18.2% | +8.9% | +15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CBU and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBU is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.94x | 0.97x | 0.95x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.50 | $45.99 | $38.10 | $38.74 | $22.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $51.12 | $33.39 | $29.18 | $28.11 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +97.6% | +89.8% | +83.6% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.1 | 56.0 | 48.1 | 58.2 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 220K | 392K | 583K | 740K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
WSBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBU as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", WSBC as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for WSBC (target: $42) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, WSBC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.08% vs TRMK's 2.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.50 | $45.50 | $41.50 | $39.25 | $22.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 9 | 16 | 15 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +2.2% | +4.1% | +2.2% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.74 | $0.97 | $1.40 | $0.72 | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +3.0% | +4.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WSBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). FFIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CBU vs TRMK vs WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBU or TRMK or WSBC or FFIN or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is the stronger pick with 51. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBU or TRMK or WSBC or FFIN or SFNC?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, WesBanco, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBU or TRMK or WSBC or FFIN or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +47.
6%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBU or TRMK or WSBC or FFIN or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Community Bank System, Inc.
(CBU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 88β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 17% more volatile than CBU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBU or TRMK or WSBC or FFIN or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is pulling ahead at 51. 4% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Community Bank System, Inc. grew EPS 15. 7% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBU or TRMK or WSBC or FFIN or SFNC?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBU leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBU or TRMK or WSBC or FFIN or SFNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WSBC: 21. 3% to $41. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBU or TRMK or WSBC or FFIN or SFNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 2% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK).
09Is CBU or TRMK or WSBC or FFIN or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Community Bank System, Inc.
(CBU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88), 2. 7% yield, +107. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBU: +107. 2%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBU and TRMK and WSBC and FFIN and SFNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CBU is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; WSBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.