Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $252M | $176M | $240M | $253M | $4.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $136M | $85M | $112M | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $16M | $16M | $18M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 69.5% | 54.4% | 65.1% | 74.0% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | 14.0% | 22.5% | 19.6% | 36.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 10.4x | 11.7x | 11.7x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $116M | $70M | $2M | $43M | $197M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $25M | $8M | $161M | $763M |
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| C&F Financial Corpo… (CFFI) | 100 | 215.0 | +115.0% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| National Bankshares… (NKSH) | 100 | 122.4 | +22.4% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CFFI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 44.1%, current ratio 24.17x
- PEG 1.16 vs FXNC's 7.87
- Beta 0.61, yield 2.4%, current ratio 24.17x
Among these 5 stocks, MNSB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NKSH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 4.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +49.7% vs FFIN's -3.2%
FXNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs CFFI's 144.1%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
FFIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.16 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs FFIN's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.7% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CFFI leads 2 • FXNC leads 1 • MNSB leads 0 • NKSH leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $739M annually — 8.7x NKSH's $85M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $136M | $85M | $112M | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $23M | $20M | $25M | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $16M | $16M | $18M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $13M | $17M | $21M | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.5% | +54.4% | +65.1% | +74.0% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +14.0% | +22.5% | +19.6% | +36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +11.5% | +18.6% | +15.8% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +7.8% | +17.8% | +18.7% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.7% | +120.9% | +91.7% | +7.1% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CFFI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CFFI trades at a 55% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CFFI offers better value at 1.45x vs NKSH's 145.48x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $252M | $176M | $240M | $253M | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $354M | $221M | $234M | $134M | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.35x | 13.36x | 15.14x | 14.27x | 20.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.51x | 10.45x | 11.71x | 11.75x | 15.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.45x | — | 145.48x | 9.55x | 3.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.72x | 11.58x | 12.20x | 6.13x | 14.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 1.30x | 2.81x | 2.25x | 6.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 0.82x | 1.30x | 1.35x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.38x | 16.57x | 15.85x | 12.03x | 15.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. NKSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFI's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFI scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +7.3% | +9.0% | +10.0% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.7% | +0.9% | +0.9% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +5.0% | +8.4% | +7.7% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +0.9% | +1.9% | +9.9% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.32x | 0.01x | 0.23x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $102M | $45M | -$6M | -$118M | -$566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $25M | $8M | $161M | $763M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $116M | $70M | $2M | $43M | $197M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.73x | 0.31x | 0.64x | 0.84x | 1.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FXNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFFI five years ago would be worth $19,542 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, NKSH leads with a +49.7% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FXNC at 28.2% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.3% | +19.4% | +14.2% | +14.6% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.3% | +26.4% | +49.7% | +46.9% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | +21.5% | +55.1% | +110.8% | +29.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +20.6% | +31.9% | +68.7% | -28.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.1% | +126.9% | +51.3% | +241.1% | +145.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.5% | +6.7% | +15.7% | +28.2% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CFFI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CFFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIN's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFFI currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.66x | 0.76x | 0.70x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $80.99 | $25.17 | $40.00 | $29.85 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $57.09 | $17.86 | $24.74 | $18.31 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +93.4% | +94.3% | +93.7% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 50.4 | 51.1 | 47.6 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 58K | 50K | 80K | 740K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NKSH and FXNC and FFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNSB as "Hold", NKSH as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -24.9% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, NKSH offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs FXNC's 2.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $21.00 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 4 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | — | +4.0% | +2.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.84 | — | $1.51 | $0.61 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CFFI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, C&F Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: C&F Financial Corporation wins at 1. 16x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 145. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) delivered a total return of +95.
4%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus NKSH's +51. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
61β versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FFIN is approximately 57% more volatile than CFFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 44% for C&F Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 12. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or FFIN?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 16x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 145. 48x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or FFIN?
In this comparison, NKSH (4.
0% yield), CFFI (2. 4% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield), FXNC (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
61), 2. 4% yield, +144. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CFFI: +144. 1%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CFFI and MNSB and NKSH and FXNC and FFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CFFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NKSH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. CFFI, NKSH, FXNC, FFIN pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.