Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CGAU vs LIN vs ECL vs CAT vs SHW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Agricultural - Machinery
Chemicals - Specialty
CGAU vs LIN vs ECL vs CAT vs SHW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Agricultural - Machinery | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $3.54B | $228.85B | $72.46B | $416.75B | $78.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.54B | $34.66B | $16.08B | $70.75B | $23.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $636M | $7.13B | $2.08B | $9.42B | $2.60B |
| Gross Margin | 34.9% | 46.0% | 44.5% | 32.5% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 39.9% | 28.8% | 17.7% | 16.6% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 27.6x | 30.5x | 37.0x | 27.0x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $26.99B | $9.43B | $43.33B | $14.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $528M | $5.06B | $646M | $9.98B | $207M |
CGAU vs LIN vs ECL vs CAT vs SHW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) | 100 | 181.5 | +81.5% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 243.7 | +143.7% |
| Ecolab Inc. (ECL) | 100 | 119.6 | +19.6% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 747.1 | +647.1% |
| The Sherwin-William… (SHW) | 100 | 160.1 | +60.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CGAU vs LIN vs ECL vs CAT vs SHW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CGAU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 2.39x
- PEG 0.64 vs SHW's 3.90
- 9.5% revenue growth vs SHW's 2.1%
LIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
- Beta 0.24, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.88x
- Beta 0.24 vs CAT's 1.54, lower leverage
- 1.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SHW's 1.0%
ECL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CAT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs LIN's 375.2%
- +181.5% vs SHW's -8.0%
Among these 5 stocks, SHW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs SHW's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 37.0x), PEG 0.64 vs 1.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.2% margin vs SHW's 10.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs CAT's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SHW's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.5% vs SHW's -8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.1% ROA vs LIN's 8.3%, ROIC 13.6% vs 11.3% |
CGAU vs LIN vs ECL vs CAT vs SHW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CGAU vs LIN vs ECL vs CAT vs SHW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CGAU leads in 3 of 6 categories
CAT leads 1 • LIN leads 0 • ECL leads 0 • SHW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CGAU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 45.8x CGAU's $1.5B. CGAU is the more profitable business, keeping 41.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHW's 10.9%. On growth, CGAU holds the edge at +61.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $34.7B | $16.1B | $70.8B | $23.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $738M | $12.1B | $3.5B | $14.0B | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $636M | $7.1B | $2.1B | $9.4B | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $5.1B | $1.9B | $11.4B | $2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +46.0% | +44.5% | +32.5% | +49.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +28.8% | +17.7% | +16.6% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +20.6% | +12.9% | +13.3% | +10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +14.7% | +11.8% | +16.2% | +12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.8% | +8.2% | +4.8% | +22.2% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +13.4% | +19.3% | +30.2% | +7.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CGAU leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, CGAU trades at a 87% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CGAU offers better value at 0.42x vs SHW's 4.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $228.8B | $72.5B | $416.8B | $79.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $250.8B | $81.2B | $450.1B | $93.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.14x | 33.85x | 35.24x | 47.57x | 31.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.51x | 27.56x | 30.47x | 36.99x | 26.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.42x | 1.33x | — | 1.69x | 4.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.31x | 19.75x | 22.66x | 33.41x | 21.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.67x | 6.73x | 4.51x | 6.17x | 3.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.77x | 5.82x | 7.46x | 19.71x | 17.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.47x | 44.97x | 38.05x | 40.56x | 29.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CGAU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHW delivers a 58.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $58 in annual profit, vs $18 for LIN. CGAU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHW's 3.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs CGAU's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.6% | +17.8% | +22.0% | +47.5% | +58.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.1% | +8.3% | +8.8% | +10.0% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.6% | +11.3% | +12.7% | +15.9% | +16.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.6% | +13.0% | +15.8% | +19.1% | +21.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.68x | 0.96x | 2.03x | 3.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$498M | $21.9B | $8.8B | $33.4B | $14.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $528M | $5.1B | $646M | $10.0B | $207M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $27.0B | $9.4B | $43.3B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 51.90x | 34.52x | 9.82x | 9.22x | 7.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,612 for SHW. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs SHW's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs LIN's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.9% | +15.5% | -2.0% | +50.2% | -2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +146.3% | +11.2% | +2.0% | +181.5% | -8.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.1% | +39.7% | +52.7% | +324.9% | +42.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.3% | +73.9% | +17.3% | +282.5% | +16.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.7% | +375.2% | +139.5% | +1227.6% | +250.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.6% | +11.8% | +15.2% | +62.0% | +12.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIN and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs ECL's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.23x | 0.64x | 1.56x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.17 | $521.28 | $309.27 | $931.35 | $379.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.35 | $387.78 | $249.04 | $318.11 | $301.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +94.7% | +83.0% | +96.2% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 51.7 | 46.0 | 76.2 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 2.3M | 1.4M | 2.4M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LIN and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CGAU as "Buy", LIN as "Buy", ECL as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", SHW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.5% upside for ECL (target: $327) vs -5.0% for CAT (target: $851). For income investors, LIN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.21% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $559.14 | $327.11 | $850.50 | $389.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 28 | 37 | 53 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.0% | +0.7% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 | 12 | 8 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $6.00 | $2.64 | $5.86 | $3.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +2.0% | +1.1% | +1.2% | 0.0% |
CGAU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CGAU vs LIN vs ECL vs CAT vs SHW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CGAU or LIN or ECL or CAT or SHW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CGAU or LIN or ECL or CAT or SHW?
On trailing P/E, Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) is the cheapest at 6. 1x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Centerra Gold Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Centerra Gold Inc. wins at 0. 64x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 90x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CGAU or LIN or ECL or CAT or SHW?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to +16. 1% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1230% versus ECL's +137. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CGAU or LIN or ECL or CAT or SHW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
23β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 56β — meaning CAT is approximately 565% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for The Sherwin-Williams Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CGAU or LIN or ECL or CAT or SHW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus 2. 1% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Centerra Gold Inc. grew EPS 725. 7% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CGAU leads at 16. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CGAU or LIN or ECL or CAT or SHW?
Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) is the more profitable company, earning 44. 7% net margin versus 10. 9% for The Sherwin-Williams Company — meaning it keeps 44. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus 16. 1% for SHW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CGAU or LIN or ECL or CAT or SHW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 64x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 90x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 37. 0x for Caterpillar Inc. — 27. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ECL: 27. 5% to $327. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — CGAU or LIN or ECL or CAT or SHW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Linde plc (LIN) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 7% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).
09Is CGAU or LIN or ECL or CAT or SHW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
23), 1. 2% yield, +374. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +374. 6%, CGAU: +252. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CGAU and LIN and ECL and CAT and SHW?
These companies operate in different sectors (CGAU (Basic Materials) and LIN (Basic Materials) and ECL (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials) and SHW (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CGAU is a small-cap deep-value stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ECL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.